Jump to content

Malkavias

Members
  • Posts

    177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malkavias

  1. Thinking power of a rock, right here.

    No, the irony is that the only responsible parties, myself and Zzzptm, are the only parties not at war, that the wronged alliance, Black Defense Council, is not part of this DC war, nor were they aware - they heard about it from me before they knew it was on.

    That part right there bothers me a bit. They're the wronged ones? We're the gorram ones being executed!

  2. clarification: "Browncoats" did not do this. A member of browncoats leadership did, without the knowledge of the BC prime minister. All members involved in this shameful incident have been ejected.

    The only problem with this is no one really cares. There is only the oppertunistic chance to destroy the unpopular because it can be done. An alliance is being sacrificed for illegal actions of previous and now expelled government and it's members are the one paying for it. I would not be suprised to see several nations go inactive or delete due to this kind of treatment. Way to make the game fun to play.

    Edit: typo

  3. i'm nconfused then, doesn't that make their treaties whole again? wasn't that the whole point of the original terms, BC having their treaties re-instated after 1 months time?

    or am i just really, really off base here.

    Between everyone and their mother declaring on us while we were having a government overhaul to try and repair the damage done, we have barely had time to speak to our former partners about anything.

  4. BC's terms to BDC came to an end when I posted last night. Releasing them to any commitments to BDC as of the last update.

    Thanks for the clarification. However, I still ask why part of the DoW was for violation of zzzptm's terms, which we had been told to disreguard.

  5. Again please read Myworld's post:

    The BDC situation is now being handled in a manner that Myworld and the DCP sees fit. ZZPTM has been expelled from BDC and as such BDC will remain our friend as long as he isn't around. The BDC has a chance to change their destiny, however, the BC does not at this point.

    And the reasoning for the distinction of how the alliances are treated would be? zzzptm and Schattenmann enacted a plan without informing their alliances of the actions. Both alliances remove those people. BDC gets little more than a wristslap and BC get DoWed.

  6. And I tell you now, we at BC were told to scrap anything that zzz had said, and if you read that step, it said agreed by zzz.

    SO, you tell me that BC were acting wrong when we were acting on behalf of our intel given.

    This would be nice to have answered. We were given conflicting information, and now are punished because we didn't do what we were told to. That we were told not to do, then to actually do a few times.

    Communication FTW.

  7. It's only been two days. How were those that attacked to decom their military give that you get this when you try:

    "You cannot decommission tanks after having attacked an opponent within the past 2 days."

    "You cannot dismiss soldiers after having attacked an opponent within the past 2 days."

    I'd like to make it clear that I speak for myself, not my alliance, and seek only clarification. I in no way object to the actions taken regarding BC.

    I agree, they weren't able to do this. Bogus term violation is bogus.

  8. I'm going to state that by looking at the terms and also looking at the statements of the memebers of BC prior to this DoW by DC.

    1. This post shows that BC is refusing to pay 1 bit of tech

    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...st&p=568037

    2. All BC were to decom their military and that did not happen

    3. All BC were to move to BDC POW

    1: I'm not sure I follow your logic. The BC government were talking in the BDC embassy on our forums about the repayment of tech.

    2: It's hard to do that in active war. Nations were attempting to comply with their attackers.

    3: Actually no. BC was considered BDC POW, but there was never an order to change AA.

  9. What we have here is a failure to communicate.

    We were told of the initial terms by zzz. We were working to achieve that goal. When he was removed from BDC noone gave us any answer as to what the remaining situation was, other than "No, no BC's can join, ignore anything zzz said"

    We have no idea what the exact erms that were violated are, as we were told to disreguard anything from zzz's commands.

  10. Until we hear otherwise from BDC, all our treaties were cancelled and we are under their protection. Ask BDC about our ability to renew treaties if any as they consider us "theirs" right now. I am unable to answer that.

    Note: 2 RoT nations are attacking me. Why?

×
×
  • Create New...