Jump to content

ericsw

Members
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ericsw

  1. Just now, mochi said:

     

    There was a disagreement in public channels and CK left Kashmir on good terms. CK needed an alliance and being good friends with Kashmir, I spoke with Jason8 and agreed on her place in COBRA. o/

     

    I wish her a long a fruitful reign in Cobra then...

     

    all the best

  2. 8 hours ago, Smitty256 said:

    Does anyone have a list of the currently sanctioned alliances in game? 

     

    Anyone know what alliances qualify for sanctions?

     

    https://forums.cybernations.net/topic/11169-the-amazing-sanction-race/page/1851/?tab=comments#comment-3587290

     

    note the NG performance...

  3. As the community may be aware NG have recently had quite the upheaval and changed its leadership. It is not everyday a living pope is replaced.

     

    vatican40-06.jpg

     

    Although some members in NG were shocked thinking the pope would reign forever, some were excited upon hearing of a new leader would be appointed.

     

    38tdwf.jpg

     

    What became clear was Stewie was not just appointed as leader, he was chosen to lead.

     

    He began to teach his men and answer their questions

     

    One man shouted 'We should all do a Term, the enemy is too many!!'

     

    to which Stewie responded 'I grant you each 2 nukes per day, send these nukes to your enemy and you will be granted salvation'

     

    What if they kill our CMs with a nuke?? 'Buy just 2 CMs and launch them at your enemy without delay'

     

    soon it became clear, wisdom was granted to our leader to be passed down to his followers

     

    Hope had returned to NG. A new dawn was upon us and we were all here to do our bit for the world.

     

    The gospel according to Stewie needs to be recorded to help all new players who join CN learn as we learn each day.

     

    Please share your teachings.... 

     

     

     

     

     

  4. Terms war avoidance tactics are documented in the bakery thread

     

    they included,

    • Messaging the guys hitting him to agree a 'ceasefire'
    • When Crinkledstraw hit term, he again demanded a ceasefire saying he was unable to be active until thursday
    • Request was denied by CS, term was super active during the war!
    • To avoid the CS nuke damage with 8k tech nukes, term arranged for friendly wars against nations with 100 tech (one of which was against Brian who does CN radio with Hannsen in discord) 
    • Term also had a war deleted for war slot filing with Masterchief
    • Term was hit by Nord from infowars, term is then accepted in NoR, NoR request peace for term on the basis that 'he was not an active participant in the war'
  5. 21 minutes ago, Canik said:


    That you haven't been ZIed this war, not even close, just proves one of my points - you take less damage at lower levels. Buying up can affect that. 
    About your slots being full or me not buying land, that's beside the point. We're clearly not discussing the same subject if you think those comments have a point to me. You seem to be taking this all very personally but I'm not talking about you. Aside from that one time I suggested you're one of those WC huggers.. but you say you're down to 14m war dead? Not entirely sure what that means, I think you might need to say that one more time again. xD If you're down to 14 mil, then I'm definitely not talking about you. :P
     


    I mean, I started with 3 bil, fought for 5 months, did the most damage in the war and still have 500 mil left. More than enough to stomp you for the rest of time like I did last round. That was super easy, and you let me get outta anarchy too so I could stagger your allies. Thanks for that. :)

     

    No we are taking about the same thing but have a different understanding. I said your stats were not impressive for the amount of wars you had, considering many opponents do not fight back and you get a 1.1. ratio it is not good ever for an active player. 

     

    You do not take less damage at lower levels, this is the point i was trying to make to you earlier. It is the same damage you take.

     

    Perhaps you are saying, if we took the decision to spend all of our cash on infra, we would build our NS much higher and as a result take more damage fighting stronger nations than i agee

     

    but we would have no cash to fight... hence why they call it a warchest! we are using it for war, not infra

×
×
  • Create New...