[A...! :O DECLARATION!!! ...of waaaar?! \o?]

My personal opinion:

 

The war looks legit enough. If Skaro was on Defcon 5 and without proper defenses up, it is their fault. War was expected anytime. Though i find nothing wrong in countering by attacking Defcon 5 enemies. It makes sense to put them down before they wake up, especially if you dont find any Defcon1 attacker to take on whom you can match up to.

[Romans Provoke NDO]

All the best RE! o/

 

Should be a good war, we will be watching the fireworks closely  :popcorn:

 

Someone pointed out that this might be misconstrued... so to be clear, I meant 'we' as in the TE community will be watching.  ;) 

[Romans Provoke NDO]

All the best RE! o/

 

Should be a good war, we will be watching the fireworks closely  :popcorn:

[Making TE Better]

Well, i would like to thank Kongland and other Citadel members like Predrag, WC and DZE in helping me understand the game. I joined in to get experience in SE. I am new to Cybernations SE too, joined 28th December. TE is an excellent way for young SE members to learn about the game. It shows you everything, teaches you everything.. all the possible scenarios one can face in SE in just 1 month. But had it not been for patient members like Kongland, i would have left the game midway.

Going by the spirit in these forums, to keep the game alive, please take time to train members and someone please make a good guide. I mean a really comprehensive one. And SHARE WITH THE WORLD!

 

PS: Yes RE, i am a noob. The Citadel training didn't make me look like one. I rocked your boats ;)

[Round 29]

I am new here, so have a different perspective of things. But here are my suggestion, radical ones:

 

• Make joining an alliance compulsory: Simple way, users cannot enter war mode unless they are in an alliance of at least 5 members

 

• Alliance government: A vote will be conducted within alliance on the 3rd day of alliance creation. Players can stand for the elections in the alliance.The winner will be chosen as leader. This leader can then elect 4 high council [HC] members. Only leader and high council members can declare a war on another alliance. Individual members cannot attack another nation unless a war has been declared on their alliance. The leader can also elect officials among the players.

 

• Rewards: Create rewards for Leaders, high council members and officials of the top 5 alliances at the end of the round. These will be badges that will be always on display of the users (along with alliance final rank) irrespective of future rounds. This appreciates the efforts of the active members of the alliances. (as only they will be given position of HC or officials by the alliance leader)

 

• Better guides: I found a lack of comprehensive guides. I had to rely on the senior members to figure out simple things. Like, you cant nuke anyone for 24 hrs after war.

 

Will add more points if i can think of them.

[Romans Try To Provoke NDO]

so, what kind of declare is this? I see only one active war with total damage of 428 NS.. :P

[Explosions]

This round just went crazy. Its free for all, no holds barred. Everyone is declaring on everyone. Why don't we just get rid of the alliance concept?  ;)

No room to complain anymore, these things are getting so frequent that its acceptable now.

 

Now all we got to do is wait for the next round  :popcorn:

[Explosions]

I am more surprised with the arbitrary alliances they picked. Frankly i had my hopes high, especially as they had said that it would be epic  <_< (on some other thread)

Guggenheimer isn't even an alliance..  :wacko:

[Romans Declare On..]

Sorry Kong, this was too tempting..

 

 

However, it was pointed out to me (and I quickly agreed and still think this way), that many of your nations were avoiding war. Either they were under engaged or in easy wars (actually a large number with zero damage). I actually wanted to record the damage (taken and dealt) and make a big nice post. But you can imagine the difficultues in that.

I didn't just ram on Citadel members though. Here's my notes on your top 20 nations

 

 

Many of our nations were avoiding war: No, only those engaged in RL (3-4 nations), who missed war and didnt have much to pick from when they came on.

 

Either they were under engaged or in easy wars (actually a large number with zero damage). Yes, we were doing well. At start of war, we were behind in NS and stuff from the 3 targeted alliances combined; many of whom did put up excellent fights. And hope you realize that your alliance is under engaged and in easy wars right now. Well, not for long

 

Here's my notes on your top 20 nations: You should have made those notes on Hellas and NDO, you simply had to put [0,0] everywhere. It would have saved time for you, and given you an interesting regular war. 

 

As Kongland says, you were avoiding real wars and have now chosen a lame excuse to have easy ones. Point in case: Your own wars. Pick some real targets for your nation dude! I am sure you must be getting bored with these 3 easy lopsided wars of yours. Pick equals next time round. Not a good thing to hit on an alliance with 15 in anarchy and 1 day before their war ends. Had you even let us rebuild (delayed attacking by one day), this would have been cool. What you have done is not.

 

PS: Personally, i welcome your wars on me. I was getting bored too. Yes, i picked on one unprepared guy in RE, but i am not the one who started the trend of going after easy pickings.