Argus Panoptes
-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Argus Panoptes
-
-
Just now, ericsw said:
really cant spell right can you? or u into fashion....
Aw c'mon the CK thing? Soooo nineties, I thought you would remember...
-
1 minute ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:
Better than being a milk-drinking teet suckler, Argus.
Awww why Johnny why? Tiny pixel wars got to you? GROW THE FCUK UP
-
2 minutes ago, ericsw said:
21 posts and already an attitude, i like it, u are going places kid!
wuv u more. And pls. I have an itch. Yes therrrrrrrrrreeeeeee thx!
-
8 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:
Oh hey look, another one came out of the woodwork to play
I take no comments from a bottom feeder, Johnny.
-
1 minute ago, ericsw said:
NG are in this for the long haul, like a good guinness, u need to wait for it to settle before enjoying the cream at the top!
Yes let's go! I love a good Guiness. But the sods at the top of NG need to peace out for us to truly celebrate battle, eh?
-
1 minute ago, ericsw said:
So the man had a drink too many, whats wrong with that?
Oh boys, are we counting posts? You win. But not the discussion.
-
2 minutes ago, ericsw said:
Remember, NGers lives matter too
Totally agree, but Bujango must explain his existance on Bob, no?
-
6 minutes ago, The Zigur said:
ISX made Polar nations surrender despite being significantly outnumbered. Can NG do the same?
As per last post, you are insignificant. FFS, not even an alliance. Please post elsewhere.
-
Oi! Just me, the noob. 49 pages of !@#$%^&* tl;dr, but why are NG's 4 largest nations in PM? Going out with a bang? Nope. $%&@tards, all of you.
Anyway. Special cudos to Sir Bujungo who eloped 26 days ago from his old alliance, in PM mode, has sent no aid or whatever in this period and is just perched up high as #1. What are you doing up there? Do you have a fcuking job?
Anyone in this thread better be in war mode or pretty please shut the fcuk up. I'm ready (and bored). Lets put NG to bed, at their own request.
-
52 minutes ago, otto stolz said:
Confirmed 100%
&lat=-66.00000001&lon=77
Confirmed again 100%. Thanks guys.
-
16 hours ago, King Irwin said:
The correct one is -74, 61.
Confirmed 100%. Thanks King Irwin
-
On 10-9-2016 at 7:53 PM, murtibing said:
Announcement regarding SPATR-Oculus War
There are many things which can be said about this war. But one thing sums it all up:
I've visited this thread 3 times now and still fail to understand what the announcement is. Help me out guys.
-
On 27-8-2016 at 3:23 PM, LordDarrin said:
The point of what we got going is is this. Everyone has their say. If 2/3 chose war and the 3rd says no it's a no go. You must not have read unanimous. With that being said if it's a matter that the 2 feel strongly about or maybe the 3rd is inactive well the wild card is called upon. Such as our government in the US. The president can veto something but the senate can say no it's happening.
Unanimous or not, inactive or not isn't the point. You have a lingering 4th member who has the incredible power to overturn majority triumverate vote (2-1) as he/she sees fit.So basically your wild card is your executive leader and your triumverate a trio of puppets. And tri still does not mean quattuor. Simple latin linguistics.
Your US analogy is false BTW. It doesn't work that way. I have a better one for you though, and it works just fine: Brazil!
Brazil's President Formally Impeached
Dilma Rousseff has been formally impeached. Here are five things to know about Brazil's colossal political mess.
Posted by AJ+ on Wednesday, August 31, 2016 -
On 23-8-2016 at 0:11 AM, Razgriz24 said:
The Triumvirate
There shall be an executive triumvirate. This triumvirate must be in unanimous agreement in order for any resolutions to pass.
The Wild Card
There shall be a fourth member of the triumvirate. This member shall only be used when the triumvirate can not come to a unanimous decision. The decision of the wild card shall be law in such cases.
By definition, a Triumvirate cannot have a fourth member. Tri=3. Look it up...
-
O/ IRON
O/ approaching puberty
O/ TW picking up the tab
-
Good fight TOP
-
That's been VE and IRON since the second round of the war. They let almost every fighting nation escape to PM. And so TOP is to blame for taking the revolving to door to restock on nukes?
Um, you don't do a lot of fact checking before posting do you? No, I guess not. -
Dont rush me.
Priceless. This topic should have been ended here, at the climax. -
tl;dr is applicable here.
What's this about and why is this topic posted here? <140 characters please. -
Still updating Genius? You have competing threads, but I like how you update the OP.
-
Impopolar War
Just because autocorrect keeps wanting to change it to something else -
-
Rather than being surprised that people are willing to sign with IRON due to what happened in the last war I look at what IRON has done since the war and am surprised more people aren't in line waiting to be next.
Now there's a quote I like. Nice perspective, General.
Disposal of Caustic Elements and Hazardous Materials
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Thx but drink isn't in the picture. My nation looks swell thanks for asking. Ready for whatever NG can offer. Sleep tite.