Jump to content

Scandalous Rumour

Members
  • Posts

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Scandalous Rumour

  1. [quote name='HawkeyeNation' timestamp='1342568242' post='3011300']
    From the communication I received, this seemed more like a smoke and mirrors surrender manufactured by NG. Alitb made it pretty clear he wasn't speaking for the rest of his alliance and he wasn't even a member of the US when he supposedly surrendered on their behalf. We'll have an announcement a little later which should help clear up some of the confusion.
    [/quote]

    If your honestly proposing that TTK is dragging a battered and confused micro back into a conflict it cant handle then you are clutching at straws my friend.

  2. [quote name='potato' timestamp='1341395170' post='3003307']
    Can you stop clamouring "Reset! Reset!" all the time? It's a dumb idea and won't change a single thing. The dynamics in this game come from the politics. Not from having huge warchest and a !@#$load of wonders. Do you actually think LSF and NoR will become best buddies? Do you actually think RIA and MK will see eye to eye? Do you actually think TOP and Polar will sign an MDAP? All this because we suddenly have tiny nations?
    Save from a bunch of people quitting and a (very rare) few others trying something new, the wars/politics/arguing will be the same except that all this will be done from 2K NS.
    [/quote]

    You are completely, one hundred per cent kidding yourself. Cept for the bit about LSF and NoR. good shout.

    SR.

  3. [quote name='suryanto tan' timestamp='1340802820' post='2998311']
    @NPO: What were you thinking? Are you actually think that NG asked your help because they really need your assistance?
    If today, they are cornered against difficult odds, then helping them will be a honorable things to do, and their request for the help will be a genuine one, as well. Now, you know you are walking stupidly right into their scenario. NPO needs better leader, the one that can think and play. Oh my, :facepalm:
    [/quote]

    Have you seen our war screen? I think most alliances would be happy to concede outside help is welcome when your fighting a coalition of nations twice your size :P

  4. [quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1340722117' post='2997246']
    I hate agreeing with d34th but it seems he has it right this time. I remember once upon a time being a member of NPO when we were preempted. I remember being told to go out and drum up support because we were the victims of an unjust attack. Now brehon, you are calling out d34th for riding his moralist high horse. All I have to say is seeing as you have been in the position that CSN and the rest of their coalition find themselves currently in is what horse are you riding?

    Trouble these days is that people need a treaty to justify a course of action. A backbone with conviction is just an unnecessary hindrance It would appear.
    [/quote]

    It's almost like the pragmatic thing to do in pretty much any political situation is to adopt the rhetoric and narratives that make your side look best, and your enemies worse.... Nah that can't be it. NPO defended us cause we got attacked, as an added bonus they hate GOD. WE attacked RIA to help MK, as an added bonus we just freaking LOVE a good fight. Roll with it.

    SR.

×
×
  • Create New...