Jump to content

KenoCore

Members
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KenoCore

  1.  

     

     

     

    You mean the same alliance that has thus far received 3 new members (possibly 4 if you count nashorn) and between SPATR and NEW could receive more? But hey... let's forget bout all that. 

     

    I mean NG called us cowards guys. Let's pack up and hang our heads in shame now. :(

    as far as I am aware none of those ever lost Kaskus Membership. Usually when member resigns it is on the FB forums, I never saw any of them resign. alot of our members including me go on other AA's to assist other alliances.
    you would need to discuss with leadership to know the answer you seek.

  2.  

    Oh, well at least we've moved on from your tattered CB to peace mode quips.

     

    I'd say that's probably an improvement in the discourse so far.


    it was simply a question brought about by curiosity, no need for such a tone.

    an improvement would be for alliances to not care about being declared on.

  3.  

    methinks someone knows oh so little about strategy. Particularly since NPO PMed that 5% for the entire war and this is about 25 hours into the war...

     

    There will be grand tales of Steve Buscemi's intelligence for ages to come!

    usually PMing is used for large scale wars in which case there will be many rounds and many alliances attacking you. we are incapable of declaring on all your members effectively making your "strategy" irrelevant.  unless said PM is being used to allow some members to raise a warchest in which case I approve.

    EDIT: looking at the PM of MI6 I am amazingly confused, 90% of those members are not in range of I would say 80% of our alliance. please MI6 explain

  4. That almost might be believable if Smurf didn't have a history of being an instigator in such conflicts, Sigrun.

     

    I'm not exactly sure what kind of murder-mystery you're trying to solve, especially with the intimation that MI6 is so good at CN it had Smurf act on highly suspect information that he never thought to check out and whose first inclination was to start drawing up target lists.

     

    If our allies didn't have knowledge of Smurf's repeated attempts to instigate a war with our sphere and specifically our alliance I might even tend to agree with part of what you said.

     

    However, Smurf's actions before and after he realized his blunder pretty clearly elicit that this is merely a means to further an end in his hopes of an expanding conflict, and as an alliance hit for his overreaction I have little sympathy for the devil.

    from personal views of the private FB Kaskus page we here in Kaskus prefer to keep things inclosed. we have no use to expand it, we would gain nothing nor would Unknown, nor would our allies, nor would honestly anyone.

    anyone who has any clue what Kaskus is about can tell you we enjoy war, we found what we feel a valid reason to (edit: engage) said war, and in my personal perspective don't really need nor care for anyone's approval. Like really as sad as it is the day after a war is over some members are already frisky for another, it's quite crazy.

    MI6, if you are true players in the CN game than you understand war is fun, you are pretty much 2.5x our sizes and our allies are just cheerleaders, man up, shut up, and have fun. unless you feel your "weight" is needed elsewhere in which case no offense, you are not tech heavy (like us) so you have no relevance in any future global conflict.

  5. From the looks of things, Guinness & it's former members are both at fault. however, the decision to get peace without discussion is the lesser of two evils the other being desertion during war.  Anyone who promotes war and then abandons said war and their fellow alliance members are the worst of people. stay till the end then leave.

    EDIT: Just read the laws of Guiness. Don't grasp at one law and then abandon another one. you are all hypocrites.

×
×
  • Create New...