Jump to content

King Cyan

Members
  • Posts

    341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by King Cyan

  1. 3 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    The 2 to 1 damage ration in our duel would suggest otherwise.

     

    Still better than your alliance is faring as a whole, though. That's closer to 3 to 1 damages.

     

    Deflect all you want, but fact is you made a whole other thread about dueling Armen and then he ended up winning the nuke-first part of said duel.  There is nothing more to say. 

  2. 11 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    1) You can turtle and hit 1 million casualties quite easily. These are not mutually exclusive concepts.

     

    2) The money from defeat alerts has not risen. It's the same.

     

    3) I'm sure others have turtled - I don't see what that has to do with whether the current mechanics make sense or not.

     

    Can you please try to channel every ounce of energy and discipline you have into addressing the actual issue at hand?

     

     

     

    Which exists within the context of a broader set of game mechanics that must be considered as a whole. 

     

    Still not answerin the question there fiwinwine!

  3.  

    3 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    [fixed] I've been BAWWWWing that I've been getting wrecked for well over a year.[/fixed] Has nothing to do with this round or the fact that we defeated our competition so thoroughly that they had to abandon any hope of competing with one another, merge into one large functional alliance,

     

     

    Pardon, are you talking about from when you were in AW or during your RE times those rounds ago?  I don't exactly remember Boognish Cult or Knights existing at the time well over a year ago where we merged with Ordo Paradoxia to crush you and the new Roman Empire.

     

    Are we to really believe you yourself always bought at least 1 soldier even when at ZI?  How is it still broken and "profitable" as you say especially now when there's incentive to do the opposite (with the 1 mil casualties + SE tech reward now), the money lost from defeat alerts has risen, and you yourself with your other compatriots have probably done so a few times in the past the very thing you "complain" about now? 

     

    3 hours ago, firingline said:

    and petition admin to kill off our banks while protecting theirs.

     

    Further elaboration needed, all we were talking about (and the only relevant action taken by admin) was uncapped vs. capped aid. 

     

     

     

    3 hours ago, firingline said:

    It's pretty telling that you resort to ad-hominems rather than discuss the actual issue. Seems like you're basically admitting I'm right here.

     

    So sayeth the line that ad-hominem'ed another poster as "emotional" ITT

     

  4. I'd recommend that if Admin is back in the grey about allowing foreign aid or not to also consider... tinkering with *other* mechanics for each round as well. 

     

    Example: Every other round or every third round can be THE round with foreign aid enabled (uncapped or not); every second or fourth round can be the round with first day nukes / MPs available, every 6th round can include a taunt button for the enemy (with ridiculous imagery) and so on.  Or a round where TWO nuclear launches per day are allowed / infinite spy ops are allowed (credit to Boognish for some of these ideas).  Or how about a round where nations get random unique perks (probably like later Pokemon generations, not related to current ingame CN trades) with the non-rerolling rule still in place (example: no perks for rerolls)? 

     

    On 3/4/2024 at 6:27 AM, firingline said:

    I'd rather have uncapped aid than another round of turtle-nuking.

    If you and others want to bring back uncapped aid then why stop there?  You know you can shake the game up a whole lot more!  It would also beat having to hear your constant howling around these parts when things don't exactly go your way ingame and your alliance gets its teeth kicked in pun totally intended, good day sir. 

     

    On 3/4/2024 at 6:27 AM, firingline said:

    I mean there's no point to any of it right now. It's among the most boring games on earth.

     

    Yet here we are fiwinwine.  Here... YOU... are...

     

  5. On 2/19/2024 at 1:00 PM, firingline said:

    The only one confused about whether attacks were allowed after update is you.


    If you're so clear on it why not give an exact answer as to the date?  You seem to be avoiding the question, much like AA dodging Pandy.  Maybe someone dropped the ball or there are other forces at work! 

     

      

    2 hours ago, firingline said:

    the truce you operated on for the month preceding our attacks on you, wherein you collaborated to attack us whilst not attacking one another, operating as one monolithic alliance.

     

    This sounds like a serious accusation fiwinwine... are you saying we started as one alliance before the round even began? 

  6. The ability of fiwinwine to be such a fine purveyor of fallacious malarkey is one to be almost admired, as is perhaps the sorcerer's ability behind whatever the motivations are for said fallacious malarkey. 

     

    16 hours ago, firingline said:

    Your supervisor specifically reached out demanding no actions from AW members after update, and pre-planning a dogpile on any AW nation who didn't abide by the rules. He made clear he viewed such nations as 'rogue' and sought assurances that such 'rogue' would receive no assistance of any kind. He even asked that such a rogue not be offered any aid.

     

    Still doesn't say the correct date though, 9th or 10th?  Surely there must be some wolf and / or witch who knows how to use a calendar there. 

  7. 5 hours ago, firingline said:

    I've already explained to your supervisor (but clearly not alliance leader) why we chose to hit you with another round of wars - because you were trying to escape accountability for your actions by importing thousands of tech.

    Since you brought it up first, it's actually kind of hard to tell exactly what my ingame 'actions' were that have resulted in such wanton (but not necessarily unwelcome) canine aggression towards my nation.  Supposedly peace was actually on the 10th not the 9th!  Clearly now it is a bwyon/cyan/chameleon problem. 

     

    As far as the spy ops go, all I'd have to say to that is, "pot, meet kettle!"

  8. 1 hour ago, firingline said:

    Yes.

    No.  No you are not. 

     

     

    47 minutes ago, firingline said:

    Oh, you mean after you guys fattened up your guy rather than simply let us fight?

     

    With the fattened up tech you got first?  Then as if it wasn't enough that I ran out of nukes, AA saw it fit to help you.  Guess we have different interpretations on what is fair and which alliance is which!

     

     

  9.   

    4 hours ago, firingline said:

     

    I need an updated graphic with... whatever the hell that thing is... stomping the last remaining life out of @King Cyan. At least that would be a little bit more realistic.

     

    Mang, that isn't wolf deputy alexander, that thang is YOU.  But s'all good, I get it some wolfs have difficulty seein and usin mirrors!

     

    wolf officurrr fiwinwine wportin 4 duty, arrestin out-of-line (no pun intended) hwite gurls, totally without needed backup!:

     

    8fwc19.jpg

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...