Jump to content

FlogYou

Members
  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FlogYou

  1.  

    Funny, for MHA and MI6, the number from the column "War's Declared" is OK and to compare it to TOP we must take TOP's number from completely different place to make it smaller by 1/3 ? 
     
    Once again, if you want to spend your time on presenting a case how horrible we are, at least get your numbers straight. But clearly we're an awful alliance, I don't argue that. NPO upper tier should roll us before we send more people into peace mode.

     

    I'm sorry to inform you, but if the stats and numbers being thrown around in this thread are any indication of fact, NPO has NO nations above 60K in Peace Mode, so TOP why are you not hitting them?
  2. No need to make boldface lies. 

     

    At your embassy we never discussed NoR and we have enough friends, thank you.  Just because you are allied to a treaty whore or two, doesn't mean everyone else should have 80 million treaties.

     

    I've only posted like 9 times at your forums mostly to say "hi" since pd73bassman and NG go way back.  He was a NoR diplomat to NG.    I feel bad for those that pop in to say hello to you.  I can assure you that few, if any, of them are there to kiss your ass. 

     

    I think you have a bloated sense of self-importance.

     

    Considering they have 3 treaty partners, I'd like to ask which 2 of the 3 are the treaty whores?

     

    Also, a follow-up question, what is the threshold for becoming a treaty whore? Is it based solely on the # of treaty? Is there any justification based on the types of treaties held, or the variety of alliances the treaties are held with?

  3.  
    And before that he was in TOP (Strike 1) and DBDC and pretty much still is de-facto member of DBDC.
    Bones is getting 36 votes in the senate, if I had to guess TOP accounts for a high enough percentage of that vote (Strike 2).
    It is misguided to blame Kaskus for it (Strike 3) because it probably would have happened anyway.

     

    Swing and a miss, strike 3.

     

    Care to step up to the plate again, slugger?

  4. Usually wars are accompanied by a DoW within five to ten minutes. Get your shit together.

    Unless, of course, this is unrelated to the current conflict and you forgot where your post is.

     

     

    I am too, smarty.  You DoW in game, then you post the DoW.....are you that stupid too?  This is like talking to brick walls here.

     

    I dunno, it's on par for the course with NG, so that would me that SPARTA and NG share common war tactics, does this mean that NG is as incompetent as SPARTA, or is SPARTA is as compentent as NG.

     

    I prefer to see the good in everyone!

  5.  
     


    I love how you actually just outright pre-empted NPO since you declared war before NpO posted it's ghost declaration of war.  Well done guys.  I wouldn't expect anything otherwise!

    P.S. NpO posted their war declaration ion the OWF Nov 2 @ 11:53pm; SPARTA posted theirs Nov 3 12:11 am

     

    Now as for wars in game...

     

     

    I am too, smarty.  You DoW in game, then you post the DoW.....are you that stupid too?  This is like talking to brick walls here.

     

     

    Wrong.  Are you that stupid?  TOP declares on NSO.  We declare on TOP.  You seriously can't be that stupid.....

     

    So which is it morale outrage that in-game wars preceed the OWF declaration; or hoo-hum CN norm for which all alliances should follow in the future?

     

    Have fun!

     

     


     

  6. As per rationale from the casus belli presented, NSO and NG are a threat to the safety of NpO due to their actions. But only on NSO war is declared, on the much smaller "partner in crime". Doesn't entirely make sense, on glance. That isnt answering the threat.

     

    We can understand why, once looking at the treaty web. NSO is more exposed-- easier target. From there, we see that a broader logic has been involved in this DoW. One that reflects thinking in terms of coalition warfare and wants to induce a specific chain of events. Obviously, this is an opening move in a coalition war, nothing more nothing less. This is about far more, then just NSO.

     

     

    And? Its fine, smart, and going to be fun. So hence nothing bad,... but just own it. Ok? Lets not pretend to be dumb here, this world of ours is old (maybe too old) and we all have been around the block more then once. We can see what and why happened, and now lets just make it happen without this side show which fools nobody and isn't really necessary.

     

     

    It must feel good to get that off your chest!

     

    Good show Polar.

×
×
  • Create New...