CommanderX
-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by CommanderX
-
-
or maybe we just dont care about all of your unfinished buisness and butthurt-ness
and also we do know what were doing so thank you for the consideration
-
So you're knowingly and willingly harboring this man?
if i awnser yes what will you do? because you make it sound like a crime to do so
-
This is the best thank you note I've ever received.
might be a thank you if we didnt have everyone else and their mother telling us
-
i auctually found my old cn forum login info after 3 years of not useing it. to say this: youre an asshole
that is all
-
LETS GO KILL SOMETHING!
-
WOOT
time for the global radiation to go up
and to remind everyone why Rome is the No 1 AA in these parts -
YEA!!!! I had just gotten to my pre war strength too. perfect timing IRON.
O/ ROME!
O/ IRON'S DEATH! -
ahhh.... the wording of that sentence should be changed then. "begin" should be taken out and "purchasing" should be changed to "purchase". because right now if you read it it looks like you just have to be in the top 5% to buy the first (0 -> 1) and after you have the first you can buy them whenever as long as you meet the first 3 criteria of tech, infra, and uranium.
-
I have a question about this sentence from the information index
[quote]Your nation will need a technology level of 75 or greater, an infrastructure level of 500 or greater, access to uranium for nuclear weapon production, and be ranked within the top 5% nations in order to begin purchasing nuclear weapons (Or own the Manhattan Project wonder).[/quote] I have 120 Tech, 999.99 infra, and uranium. I also own 1 nuclear weapon. but I am now ranked at 8.5%, but it wont let my buy more nukes. why? I already begin purchasing nuclear weapons. -
[quote name='Sir Sci' timestamp='1295675916' post='2591259']
Perhaps so, but it was a stupid enough of a joke that you felt compelled to respond to it.
[/quote]
well you are talking about my alliance, were going to CRAP all over you -
[quote name='Midkn1ght' timestamp='1295675130' post='2591170']
Have fun guys and gals, try not to suffer any losses while you're over there.
[/quote]
LOL I get it -
[quote name='Sir Sci' timestamp='1295673390' post='2590955']
I would disagree.Your alliance name may be humerus, but I dunno if I'd qualify it as a pun. A pun would be more like "Why did the seagull fly over the sea?" Why? "Because if they flew over the bay, they'd be baygulls."
[/quote]
that is a stupid joke <.< -
WOOT CSN!
kill em all -
lol, drunken stripper upstairs,
kill 'em all TTK -
this war just got CRAPed on
-
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1294383765' post='2567022']
Well, my nation is seven days old, was created at a time when everybody had trades, and I have had more pressing matters to attend to then the tedious one of finding trades for a nation that was soon to be war-ravaged anyway.That 'barely any military' has done pretty respectable against the opponents I've come up against, though.All I've asked is for you to back up your claims. I was under the impression that was an acceptable thing to do during a debate.As for a joke, a 'joke' is not a joke when its presented in an insulting manner, as you have repetitively done. The classic phrase 'if you live in a glass house, don't throw stones' applies rather well in response to your statements.
[/quote]
I'm going to be the bigger person and walk away
have fun -
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1294379833' post='2566911']
I would be a little more careful with your words, or start by doing a little research, if I were you.
Edit, CommanderX, if your so eager to back up your claims of the Warriors having lost more wars then anybody else, [b]I beg of you, point out [u]two[/u] instances on which we have lost[/b]. I have already pointed out two instances in which we have beat RE, so if you may, please provide evidence to support your otherwise unsubstantiated claims.
[/quote]
is that a threat, I think it is.
ITS CALLED A JOKE! GROW A PAIR AND GET OVER IT!!! -
oops, i lost 1000 soldiers, but I gained $81K in my enemies equipment
http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1001577&Extended=0
you dont even have full trades, and you barely have any military
well not that it matters anyway, 3 people attacked me at update, and I'm not even close to anarchy -
[quote name='KOwens06' timestamp='1294379033' post='2566885']
[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img]
You guys win one war against us with another alliance basically crippling us and you think you could beat us in a 1v1 war [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img]
Lets see last round we demolished you in the first week of the war. The round before that you blitzed us and we took 100k NS off your alliance. Keep trying.
[/quote]
ooooo, I'm so scared, I'm shaking in my roman armor. in fact I'm so scared I'm going to go to bed and not even stay up for update. lets see how many soldiers I have lost in the morning, my guess 500 -
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1294352103' post='2566281']
As a member of RE, it would not be in your best interests to bring up the history of wars between our two alliances, because we're considerably ahead in the series
[/quote]
well maby in alliance score, but your definitely in the lead in # of alliance wars lost!
well well see how good (Cough Cough **Bad**) you truly are
[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1294358850' post='2566395']
Warriors are baaaaaad
I have a pretty weak nation, no warchest and still I'm not in anarchy, come on guys, it's been about 2 days and you can't coordinate simple attacks?
No wonder you failed without allies
In short, hurry up and put me in anarchy.
[/quote]
hahahahahaha, I like your spirit. kick some warrior butt -
[quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1294262301' post='2564672']
You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting. In what world did you ever think you could fool me?
[/quote]
I love that movie
tKoI had it comming -
dang.... I thought I would get a little time to rebuild from our first war, now there is a second war, AND THIRD!
oh well, maybe you can finally anarchy me this round, then again, the warriors might not be able to
me:2
warriors:0 NUKE ME
-
You all want this party started? Right?
You all want this party started ... quickly! Right?
Play that beat. Play that beat.
Play that beat. Play that beat.
Play that beat. Play that beat.
Play that beat. Play that beat.
Go Go Here we go!
Go Go Here we go!
Go Go Here we go!
Go Go Here we go!
Ah-h-h-h Freak out!
O/ WAR
O/ TPC -
The Coalition of Royal Allied Powers and The Templar Knights shall be known from now on as shield brothers
[quote][img]http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa33/IronSoldier820/TTKandCRAPBanner2.png[/img]
Preamble
This document serves to show that the Templar Knights and the Coalition of Royal Allied Powers will be connected together as if we were family. Every member of each alliance shall show good will and appreciation for the other. Through similar ideals and a close relationship, both alliances strive for justice together.
Article I - Peace
The Coalition of Royal Allied Powers and The Templar Knights mutually assure that neither signatory will attack the other whether it is: Military/Spy attack, or the offering of Aid to a known enemy.
Article II - Intelligence
The Coalition of Royal Allied Powers and The Templar Knights agree that upon receiving or finding any information that could serve to be useful to the other signatory, said alliance will give the information to the other. This will be done in a timely fashion, thus requiring that the two alliances have constant communication with each other.
Article III - Mutual Defense
The Coalition of Royal Allied Powers and The Templar Knights must provide aid to the other if one should ask for it before or during a time of need, whether it is in the form of: Military, or Monetary aid.
Article IV - Optional Aggression
The Coalition of Royal Allied Powers and The Templar Knights are not required to provide: Military, Spy, or Monetary aid to the other if one has started a war, although providing aid to the other alliance is discretionary, but every knight knows he is stronger with his shield brother at his side.
Conclusion Clause
This treaty serves to show each signatory shares similar values and strives to uphold them. This treaty is subject to cancellation if either signatory believes that the requirements of this treaty are not being met in full. Termination of this pact requires 72 hours notice. This notice is required to be given firstly via private channels. Any intentional or planned violations of articles I or III result in the treaty being considered immediately void, unless otherwise agreed upon by the leadership of both signatories.[/quote]
Signed for Coalition of Royal Allied Powers:
Chuck Normis ~ Triumvir/Founder/Balloon Boy a.k.a. G. Buttersnaps
constapatedape - Triumvir/walking contradiction
Raistandantilus - Triumvir/Pope/Clubber of Baby Seals
CommanderX - MoFA/boy wonder
Mydas - MOWD/Paradoxical Conundrum
Crazyguy945 - MoIA/Awesomest of Awesomies
tarman2010 - MoF/Lover of the finer things in life
Wartime49 - Chancellor/voice of god
Signed for The Templar Knights:
mongose - Grand Master
Cyphon - Advisor
Rulesaints - Elder Councilor (Sargent at Arms)
Mandystalin - Elder Councilor
Bearer - Elder Councilor
Teredona - Elder Councilor
Hawkeye - Elder Councilor
Attn: CRAP
in World Affairs (IC)
Posted
he is, thats why (as ive said and is in no way needed to be explained to you) we know what were doing and dont care about other peoples opnions. and chuck is very aware, if you may have notices the app to join crap was pending for 7 days. and what makes you think chuck wouldnt? think hes just off in la la land doing jack all? im sorry but you saying "I'm not sure if there's still anyone after Rota" can be determined as a lie because you most certanally are that person