Jump to content

Volatile

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    66

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Volatile

  1. FOK Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1301575691' post='2681370']
    Guessing that they want their allies out at the sametime and that's why they are staying in for so long, the more people in the war, the more spread the damage right? Even if VE or FOK could handle NADC by themselves, it means that one of those alliances would be distracted from hitting the other alliances to a degree.
    [/quote]
    Sure the damage is more spread, but in total, more damage is done as well while war continues.
    Either way, I respect NADC for sticking with its allies but I doubt it is all that beneficial.


    [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1301575691' post='2681370']
    And they wouldn't be able to rebuild too well if they had reps to pay.
    [/quote]
    Prolonging war is not really the best or obvious way to decrease-the-amount-of/avoid paying reps imho


    NADC's 57 (not in pm) nations have to be divided by VE/TOP and FOK, which doesn't seem distracting overall, more like annoying.
    Those 57 are in majority approaching a state in which they can only fight by using CM's (yeah, it is a form of fighting I know)

    I wonder if NADC continues per ally request (pressure) or really feel they still have a place on the battlefield.

  2. FOK Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Kajdav' timestamp='1301464957' post='2680502']
    Check again. :)
    [/quote]

    NADC
    24-mar : 1,786.660
    29-mar : 1,345.643
    net loss: 441.017 -> roughly 25%

    FOK
    24-mar : 6,146.301
    29-mar : 5,940.907
    net loss: 205.394 -> about 3%

    Timmehhh stated that from that 200k NS loss about 90K is because a nation passed away (1% net loss)
    I am afraid I don't get the point your are trying to make.

  4. FOK Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='avenger218' timestamp='1301090825' post='2676352']
    ...NADC was an economic and diplomatic alliance (GUARD was a diplomatic bloc), we didn't have the mindset to be a military power.
    alot of our talent was lost during the Bleu war, sadly we didn't recover.\
    [/quote]

    This pretty much describes how war will end for NADC.
    With all respect, NADC lacks military wonders and warchests to sustain war much/any longer.

  7. Announcement from VE, PC, Fok, iFOK, MN, and NpO

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Congratulations to all involved.

    It was about time to close this war and I'm happy with the terms.

    I've much respect for my former NpO opponents, had good wars and a good time chatting
    with most of them. Time to move on and rebuild. Thanks and I hope no hard feelings.

    Also, respect to iFOK and VE, almost none of my opponents ever got into peace.
    Great team work, its been my pleasure to fight this war with you guys.

    o/ peace

  20. iFOK treaty cancellation

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Volatile

    [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1294617927' post='2570394']
    iFOK and NEW grew up on different sides of the treaty web, [b]and had different expectations of how allies should act[/b]. Despite both being prolific raiders, this treaty was never "meant to be," if you will.
    [/quote]
    Exactly.

    If NEW would have been communicating with their treaty partners as anyone would expect
    from their allies, yeah, then this would suck.
    But apparently, NEW was very hard to reach. They did however have time to chat around with others.

    If you drag your allies into a mess, acting like on a moral high ground but refusing to meet your concerned allies, you are kind of giving your partners the finger.

    Good call iFOK.

×
×
  • Create New...