[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1301575691' post='2681370']
Guessing that they want their allies out at the sametime and that's why they are staying in for so long, the more people in the war, the more spread the damage right? Even if VE or FOK could handle NADC by themselves, it means that one of those alliances would be distracted from hitting the other alliances to a degree.
[/quote]
Sure the damage is more spread, but in total, more damage is done as well while war continues.
Either way, I respect NADC for sticking with its allies but I doubt it is all that beneficial.
[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1301575691' post='2681370']
And they wouldn't be able to rebuild too well if they had reps to pay.
[/quote]
Prolonging war is not really the best or obvious way to decrease-the-amount-of/avoid paying reps imho
NADC's 57 (not in pm) nations have to be divided by VE/TOP and FOK, which doesn't seem distracting overall, more like annoying.
Those 57 are in majority approaching a state in which they can only fight by using CM's (yeah, it is a form of fighting I know)
I wonder if NADC continues per ally request (pressure) or really feel they still have a place on the battlefield.