Jump to content

Caesar833

Members
  • Posts

    2,002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Caesar833

  1. Actually, I would say community is what defines an alliance

    It is a large part of an alliance. But like someone already pointed out; if a community is an alliance then NPO and many many others are older alliances then the game itself. Which really doesnt work out if ya think about it.

  2. What a bothersome subject, what matters to me is that the group never ceased to exist at all. Formally you data huggers may be right. Still it depends how you approach the subject, but I'm getting tired of using metaphors.

    Our AA may have been abandoned, but the alliance itself never ever died.

    I can't wait to celebrate our 4th birthday on the 12th of July.

    Edit: Oh, and Bilrow hun, you're invited off course. :wub:

    The alliance disbanded. That is a fact. That is the equivalent to death for an alliance, so yeah you did die. Maybe your community never did but so what? Community does not equal alliance if you are not in the game with an AA. Its simple.

  3. You disbanded the alliance. That means it was over and done. Then you reformed. That means that you restarted something that wasnt there. You can not claim the original start date anymore. I dont see why this is hard to grasp.

  4. Nuke rogues do drive people from here. Even NORMAL rogues drive people from here.

    Back during the WotC I was assigned three ~20K nations to hit (I was non-nuclear). Two left a little over a week later (stopped logging in and deleted from inactivity), the third left a month later. I'm not necessarily proud of my skill to cripple nations; but it is possible to drive people from here.

    People do leave. Nuke rogues simply increase the number of people leaving.

    I think a nuke rogue would help me stay interested in the game actually.

  5. Electron Sponge was a patriot, he loved Polar and wanted to further its interests. Once Polar were rolled, he spent a year fighting the people responsible for bringing it down and eventually succeeded. I don't understand how that makes him a villain in any sense of the word.

    Were you not around for the alliances he killed!?!?! But seriously he did kinda make himself out to be a villain and im sure he loves being called one. No need to defend him

  6. That's also true; that's why I edited-in the part about present-tense. People say how awesome Starfox is at military, but with all due respect Starfox hasn't led an alliance military in over a year, maybe 2. Rebel_Virginia's NPO war guide is still one of the most comprehensive, but it's 3 years old, you know what I mean. Or, I know ChairmanHal did a good job with Browncoats' forces, but that was two years ago, you see.

    Yeah I know what you mean. Thing is with the exception of the navy and maybe the MP, not much has changed in the war system. Sure nations are larger now and have more resources to use but as WC said that just leads to larger warchests. The navy is pretty ineffective too so adding that in a guide or strategy isnt that important.

×
×
  • Create New...