Jump to content

Hiro Nakara

Members
  • Posts

    3,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hiro Nakara

  1. Keep in peace mode :) as commented above, it only hurts them. Atleast when they do come out of peace mode, and they will have to knock the old red doctorine on the head :D They wont be in any fit state to back up there threats :)

    Ohhhh how things change for the better.

    o/ NPO

    It goes to show you that even 12 mongrel dogs can take a lion down, and this pleases me.

  2. Paying reps and recovering from being reduced to 1 fifth our former size is not enough of a deterrent to ensure that we are no threat against Karma alliances anymore? You really have to dismantle our heavy hitters who have the tech amount to induce at least some kind of damaging effect in our enemies? You might as well tell us all to reroll, it would have the same effect of cripling Echelon's military abilities.

    Erm Newsflash, thats exactly the point, do you really think that Karma are going to allow you to rebuild faster by keeping your tech? knowing fine well that if given the opportunity to attack, you would.

    I really can't see the problem in nations over 1k tech paying it back ? Please I'm having trouble trying to understand why you would throw away lenient terms for the sake of having nations paying back reps? You know that the terms if refused will be even harsher than the first. Which only brings you down, so instead of having the well being of your members at heart and getting them out of war, you instead want to not pay and condemn them to destruction. If anyones forcing re-rolls on there members, ITS YOU.

  3. Whats the problem with these terms? Your lucky Top and select others are being generous and letting you off lightly. Why they want to do this when the terms are okay, I don't know. God on the other hand have a back bone and dont seek or need approval of TOP to decide whats right and wrong, and you disslike this? So you make this poor thread about how hard done by you are.

    Maybe you need to relable your alliance as Oliver, then ask for some more........... please sir.

    I say you keep on fighting, not for the fact you dont agree with the terms, just for the fact it makes you take more punishment :)

    Thanks for mentioning Nemesis in the plot to destroy planet Bob. You know it makes sense, a small alliance of 30-40 people have such an impact on planet Bob.

  4. yes I agree you did, but not after trying to avoid the obvious outcome. which was war. Correct me if im wrong, you tried to get peace to avoid this kicking off? again if I'm wrong I stand corrected. You then took a fair portion of time to evaluate the situation ? am I wrong ? then you chose the side that best suited your alliances needs, which I'm not blaming you for, but as I said above people view that as oppertunistic. Again if im wrong them I stand corrected and i appologise.

    As commented before i found the top people I fought alongside very competant, but at no point did I need assistance. Like commented by one of your members " i regret rushing to the Aid of Nemesis"

    Nemesis fought against 3 Alliances, yet you still feel the need to try and use a trump card for who battled the most ? relevent to my point ? No I dont think it is.

  5. I'm not going to lie. I do believe I am better than most people. Call it egotistical or arrogant, I don't care.

    You sir made me laugh so hard its unreal, do you honestly think like that ? or does !@#$%baggery come natural to you ?

    I found the nations in top I was fighting along side with quite decent and easy to communicate with. And to tarr Nemesis badly due to 2 people argueing, well, what more do I need to say on that matter. We believe in friendship before pixels or infra, if that is to hard to grasp then, hmm i dont know.......

    I think picking clear sides as early as possible has its benefits, example would be that people see your a no-nonsense alliance that stands by its friends. Rather than not making an important descision and hopeing it will go away, then picking the winning side. You musn't be shocked to realise people will view that as oppertunistic ferrets. Not that I am saying you are ferrets but you know people will view it that way.

    As said by numerous others Baps fought well, Top certainly did not save me, or many other Nemesis members, so please dont take the moral high ground of we saved you, as thats simply not true ;)

    Again I would like to reinterate the fact that Baps deserved this peace treaty for there conduct in fighting, they proved themselfes as great warriors.

    Again this is my opinion and I am in an alliance where im not curbed from stating it. Good or Bad, like the idiot above whos heads so far up his own rectum, i do not care what people think of me or Nemesis.

    o/ Baps

    o/Nemesis

  6. Sarcasm. A wonderful tool.

    You get what you have given to others, or at least that is what you should get. Valhalla has given terrible terms to alliances in the past.

    QFT

    And as you say Buds The Man, "Very Karma of you" :) indeed it is, but I can understand how bad it must feel when the shoe is on the other foot and your at the recieving end :) so I completly agree with you. it was very Karma of me saying that :)

    o/ Karma

    o/ Nemesis

    o/ Baps

    Now jog on Valhalla :D

  7. Great fight Baps, until we meet again.

    All this talk of preparing, there is no doubt in my mind that if any alliance chooses to go down the war route again v such overwhelming odds, they will no doubt meet the same end result, anarchy and defeat.

    As for the members from valhalla having there petty snipes, you suck so bad its unreal, you could have some class and say Good terms guys we hope you prosper now the war has ended for you, instead of idiots that snipe/post complete garbbage.

    I truly hope you get the worst terms possible ;)

×
×
  • Create New...