Jump to content

Kowalski

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,134

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Kowalski

  2. CAMTIN DoW

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='NoFish' timestamp='1323323215' post='2868621']
    You're not particularly happy with it, so you're going to embroil two alliances in the conflict who had no reason to be involved. They gave no indication of their neutrality - aside from, of course, the fact that they hadn't entered the war - until after people were made aware that you going to attack them? So, once again. Is it the responsibility of an alliance to report their neutrality to the Doomhouse Hegemony or risk being rolled?
    [/quote]
    Lusitan has already answered this - if you're in an alliance that has treaty chains to someone engaged against an ally of ours then yes, it might be a sensible and responsible option to consider the possibility that our paths may cross at some point in the future. Unless indicated otherwise we're going to assume that you're coming in at some point, not entering the war yet isn't a good enough indication of neutrality unless you're a neutral alliance. It's an indication that you haven't entered the war yet.

  5. Royal Declaration from Sparta

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Kowalski

    [quote]The awkward moment when this guy doesn't realize Sparta has no reason to be crossed out of the picture......I'm pretty sure the 501st didn't destroy the Jedi temple and then everyone said "Yep the Clone Troopers are out of this war" lol dude come on I mean I knew IRON as full of dip s**** I mean that's stupid even coming from a IRON member. [/quote]
    He's in BAPS not IRON and I think he's marking out the ones that BAPS are fighting, but why he'd expect MHA and RNR to declare on a !@#$house alliance like BAPS is beyond me.

  8. Third Time's the Charm

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    What a brilliant move. I'm not sure of tactically astute it is but we should have more stuff like this, and even the 'lolwut' brigade or those banging on about RIA or Fark's treaty with Polar should admit that.

    [quote name='Derwood1' timestamp='1322890676' post='2859986']
    I thought FAN had better taste then hangin out with Fark.....
    [/quote]
    What the hell gave you that idea?

    [quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1322892596' post='2860163']
    1. We didn't. 2. You just implied your ally sucks.
    [/quote]
    1. You did. 2. They do.

  10. A GPA DoW

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Darth Banana' timestamp='1322634081' post='2856649']
    Wow, I almost thought GPA would finally get up and roll all of us!

    Best fake DoW so far, like many others I almost went for it XD

    Go Neutrals, I await the day for your great arrival in war :awesome:
    [/quote]
    But...they're neutral.

  11. A GPA DoW

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='NewPoseidon' timestamp='1322633522' post='2856635']
    A wonderful declaration of worthlessness from the GPA. Of all the non-DoW Dow's in my time, none of them were in any way clever, enlightening, or entertaining. I wish you people would stop wasting my time. Go sit in your hole and play with your infra.
    [/quote]
    This is an opinion I can get behind.

  14. An Official Announcement from PF

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1322353330' post='2853029']
    It didn't need to be made, but we had to make it...we wrote into the charter that a DoS has to be made if the original war isn't a bloc-wide declaration. Can't quite remember why we did so, but there it is.
    [/quote]
    Wow. I did think why there would be a clause insisting on an outdated, unnecessary and sometimes counterproductive piece of bureaucracy, but I guess some the Citadel lives on in PF.

    o/ Pillowfort

  23. Announcing Treaties on the OWF

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1318015843' post='2819974']
    The idea that people should/can get all the info they need on IRC is also laughable; it's like saying you should go to the mall to get news instead of watching the news or reading a newspaper.
    [/quote]
    [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1318022247' post='2820088']
    Well said.
    [/quote]
    The two of you consider IRC to be an inferior source of information to the OWF? Probably explains a lot.

  24. Where's VE?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Maverick87' timestamp='1317914972' post='2818529']
    Quick summary...

    Legion DoW's Tetris
    NsO/NSO come in on MD clauses to support their allies in Tetris
    BTA/IAA come in on oA clauses to support their allies in NsO
    TLR/GATO come in "financially" to support their allies in IAA.

    What I don't get is where the hell is VE? Don't they have an MDoAP with Tetris?
    [/quote]
    How much do you wish you could delete your own threads?

  25. Announcing Treaties on the OWF

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    Fair enough, although I still think people aren't as interested in an accepted process anymore. Updating the wiki, posting DoW's before attacking, announcing treaty changes, there's less interest in 'following the rules' regarding them and anyone who whines about it is branded a whinging moralist. Even things like declarations of support and election/gov change threads seem horribly outdated. Most alliance business is done on IRC where the same information that appears on the wiki or here is readily available, so anything officially published just comes across as posturing. Times change, and I wouldn't be surprised of all that stuff was sub-consciously linked to pre-Karma and a willingness to adopt new ways with fewer rules to follow is a reaction to that.

×
×
  • Create New...