Infinite Narwhal
-
Posts
374 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Infinite Narwhal
-
-
What was the hardest decision you have had to make in the game?
What is the most beautiful thing you have ever seen in cybernations?
Who is the strangest person you know in the game?
Do you have a beard? If not, do you ever plan on sporting one?
-
GATO deserves respect and should be released.
-
What malignant spirit possessed you to make this thread?!
-
Opinions on the Blackstone Collusion?
If you could be any other person in cybernations for 24 hours who would you be?
If you knew that cybernations was going to disappear tomorrow what would you do?
You discover that the person you're head-over-heels interested in, loves a good dessert. What will you concoct when you have this person over?
-
Too lazy to register. You must authorize guests to peruse the forums and examine alliances.
-
'Twas beautiful.
-
Now we have 2 issues;
either 1) it's an honest mistake (these do happen). or 2) It's not a mistake, and it's coming from an alliance that doesn't recognize groups your size (whatever it is, I don't know) as an "alliance" (personally I think that kind of policy is retarded too but that's not the issue here).
Now assuming it's the first option.... you think you're ready to nuke someone over an honest mistake and escalate something that is relatively simple to handle into something that's definitely going to make you look like the idiot?
Assuming it's the 2nd option; do you really think it would be wise to nuke a member of an alliance which doesn't even recognize you as an alliance in the first place? Where do you think this will lead?
But whatever, I think I made my point. Have fun enforcing this
Such a mistake is very unlikely. The raider would have to be very reckless. A nuke would be good motivation not to make such a mistake again. Tech-raiding should not be tolerated.
-
Someone making the mistake of raiding an aligned nation is pretty common.
Nuking someone in return is not a mistake, and it certainly won't be viewed well by that member's alliance, especially while you're asking for a $6 mil handout.
You should probably brainstorm a few different scenarios that extend further than simply "*fire nuke* we demand money" and ask yourselves what you would do if the other alliance tells you to piss off. Cause it's gonna happen.
Small alliances are constantly troubled with raiders. It isn't always a "mistake". Those who are raided need this policy to deter people from making these "mistakes".
-
Plus nuking an aligned nation isn't really a good idea, Might I add.
Raiding an aligned nation isn't a good idea. Don't raid them if you don't want to be nuked.
-
I approve. Tech-raiding is not acceptable. Excellent policy.
-
Vox! 'Tis most entertaining. Feed me more!
-
Ah yes, I remember you, you were the group who couldn't be bothered to get good grammer in you're message you seant me ingame a few weaks ago.
Pity i almost forgotten u but know i cann't do it!
Oh dear
-
Vox! I always enjoy reading your announcements. May you continue to spread joy.
-
Alright, just didnt appreciate the first part of your post to me but perhaps I took it the wrong way, moving on.
Now, keep in mind I am not partaking in this discussion as a representative or even a member of NPO. Pacifica is in a different position when it comes to acquiring tech then the rest of the world. Their choice in controlling the Red Sphere has led to there being no smaller alliances on the sphere for them to build tech trading relations with. That means they need to look outwards from the Red Sphere. I am of course not privy to all of the talks that led up to the founding of Agora but I do not find it surprising that longtime allies of NPO, Echelon and MCXA, have put together Agora along with NPO so in essence it combines the Blue and Red spheres economically tech speaking.
NPO is desperate enough for tech that it is willing to cause separation in the blue sphere? It is obvious that NPO's interests are not just in tech. They are in several blocs and can trade tech with their numerous allies. GATO is only allowed to do tech deals with NPO and I'm sure they have an abundance of sellers. The fact that NPO is in a position to influence politics in the blue sphere is what makes their membership in Agora significant.
-
O doesn't count as a vowel anymore?
Doh! That was one of my moments. I meant their acronym doesn't have enough vowels. -
There are not enough vowels in your acronym! You must abbreviate your name in a way that we can say it.
-
NPO hogs the blankets.
-
GPA!!! Let it rain green jello!
-
No, you are mistaken. It isn't a war that's coming. A party of epic proportions is about to break out.
-
NPO is in the top four blocs of the game. There is no need for them to be in Agora. If the blue team alliances need NPO in Agora then their ineptitude is beyond comparison.
-
Having a red team signatory does not help blue unity at all.
-
-
NPO is in the top four blocs of the game. I can see why they would oppose another large bloc.
-
There seems to be an awful lot of spinning going on in this thread.
This is the carousel of cybernations!
Doh! That was one of my moments. I meant their acronym doesn't have enough vowels.
This Week in Pacifica
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
NPO's disrespect for GATO is very apparent. The banning of GATO members is baseless and disgusting