kencojenko
-
Posts
475 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by kencojenko
-
-
i knew about this six months ago
-
This thread did not deliver.
I am disappoint. -
[quote name='Chaoshawk' timestamp='1292734288' post='2543801']
We unleashed all of our hate in Bipolar, we have no problem with each other.
Also, seems to partly explain why TOP has visited us as of late. They want to move in over here!
[/quote]
Actually that has more to do with me becoming active again and still liking you guys. I can stop visiting if you don't want me... ;_; -
*deep breath*
My door is open to queries from concerned folk - friend/foe/neutral. This applies to governments and members.
I'll be around til 4am GMT (40 mins from now). -
Finally!
This is a long time in the works and a signal that two great alliances are ready to move forward as friends with a common goal. -
Congratulations guys.
o7 -
Tthis one was also decided by a single vote with 3rd place only one vote behind second. So yes, i think this counts as closer.
-
Edited to add in the heptagon.
-
[center][img]http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/1841/topflagnt2.png[/img]
Our Elections have ended and the new government has been confirmed. [/center]
[b]The 28th Paradox Council[/b]
Grand Master: Jenko
Grand Hospitaller: SkyGreenChick
Grand Chancellor: GuardianofNewbs
[b]The Heptagon[/b]
Crispy
Carl the Conqueror (newly elected)
Shardoon (newly elected)
Crazy Canuck
Edifice
Richard Rahl
Seasons of Love
We look forward to a new era for TOP and for CN.
[img]http://ordoparadox.com/top/public/style_emoticons/default/TOP.gif[/img] -
-
-
-
Cattle - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=275936]kencojenko[/url]
Lead - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=275936]kencojenko[/url]
Uranium -
Aluminum - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=398448]Orson[/url]
Marble -
Iron -
Lumber - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=434933]Duke of Carleton[/url]
Wheat - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=434933]Duke of Carleton[/url]
Water -
Pigs - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=415968]Lupus[/url]
Spices - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=415968]Lupus[/url]
Sugar - [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=398448]Orson[/url]
First come first serve, i decide who is in the circle and if the resource combinations make completing the circle difficult i may have to drop you. Just post here with your nation link and resources and i'll add you to the circle. Resources non-negotiable and so is the color.
Enjoy. -
[quote name='jadoo1989' date='20 March 2010 - 12:08 AM' timestamp='1269043662' post='2230710']
Actually, I brought the concern up to TOP weeks ago and was simply told it was 'coalition aid' and that Crymson wasn't aware. I guess by the tone of your post, he probably was though. Thanks for posting a detailed response, though. It's good to see. You are right, however, communication could've been better.
[/quote]
If you raised the concern with Crymson, i'm sure he probably did report it back to me in one way or another and that i either missed the message or there was a mix up in communication. As the head of aid, i'll take the blame for that. -
[quote name='jadoo1989' date='19 March 2010 - 10:50 PM' timestamp='1269039013' post='2230609']
Leadership from both of our alliances have met on several occasions to try and maintain control of the situation. We have discussed our issues together, from TOPs attack on CnG and our attack on IRON, to TOPs aiding of an enemy of ours to whom they held no direct ties and who only had one opponent, us. We have both tried to explain our positions, but it has been found time and time again that we simply cannot agree to understand each other's points of view. In between the talks, there has been large gaps of uneasy silence. As it stands, we cannot even agree fully on the cancellation of this agreement because we are too busy defending the decisions I have outlined above. All in all, the bond that was once there now seems to have broken.
[/quote]
The only issue i wish to question is the aiding of alliances we were not treatied to. We decided to aid them because we were all fighting the same war, regardless of the opponent. As the organiser of said aid, the only time i heard of your problem with it was a couple days ago when a member of Gramlins challenged me on it. Fark were good enough to come and explain the problem with it and we dutifully decided to back down on the aid. Unless you make your issues known, we can't act on it. But i guess that leads back to the communication problems.
For those of you who think we made you choose between us and Fark, i hope you understand that is not what we want, or what we should ever be seeking to do. We have made a lot of mistakes both during and before this war, but we have identified them and are remorseful. Anybody in MHA who has a problem with TOP or the way TOP behaves, please feel free to query/PM me so i can try to appease your concerns.
o> -
If you wish to bathe the non-believers in a nuclear fire and don't mind each one of your members applying individually, feel free to contact me about TOP's application process.
-
[quote name='Pingu' date='08 March 2010 - 09:53 PM' timestamp='1268085464' post='2218331']
Give me plenipotentiary powers and a litre of whisky and I'll have it all sorted out by tomorrow.
[/quote]
I would not be so sure of that. My personal best in a shot competition is a 350ml bottle of jack being consumed in under 5 minutes. Sure, the aftermath was not pretty, but when my drinking capabilities are challenged, you awaken something you cannot comprehend. -
[quote name='Some-Guy' date='08 March 2010 - 08:11 PM' timestamp='1268079394' post='2218214']
This is why we can't be friends.
[/quote]
I think you'll find that has more to do with the stench coming from your person.
[quote]
So, please stop talk about something you just read a few hours ago and did not experience from the inside...[/quote]
Even I lol'd. -
[quote name='Ojiras Ajeridas' date='08 March 2010 - 02:23 PM' timestamp='1268058514' post='2217970']
You sure you mean the same Jenko that we do? That ex-CON, ex-VA, now TOP Jenko? That Jenkokencojenko? That continously drunk brit Jenko? That strange and chronical spam addicted Jenko? If yes... ehm... don't know how to tell you... yes you're right
[/quote]
I haven't been drunk since i started doing a large amount of FA work. But it's my birthday in 5 days, so we'll see how that goes... -
[quote name='Bob Sanders' date='08 March 2010 - 09:11 AM' timestamp='1268039768' post='2217856']
I'd like to remind you that my quote was from way before that, had nothing to with actual gameplay and your very own Shortbowe was more than happy to allude to it as a ad hominem attack. If you are gonna tell me to let bygones be bygones I suggest you tell the same to Shortbowe.
Sky had repeatedly told people that she was planning to leave for TOP and then ran for office again and served another 2 months. I'm sorry you can't see why I have a problem with that. As far as I'm concerned she was not a loyal member of Valhalla during that last term, she was a member of TOP in every way other than alliance affiliation. Maybe she has learned alot in that time, I guess we'll find out. Forgive me if I don't have very much faith in a TOP electorate that put Crymson into gov immediately after he almost single-handedly caused one of TOP's treaties to be canceled because he was deceitful snake in the grass.
[color="#FF0000"]P.S. I'm sure Shortbowe will be along shortly to point out your incorrect usage of "than." He seems to be good at that sort of thing.[/color]
That's why she had me handle it when I had no government position? She had every ability and power as an Einherjar member to talk to a tiny alliance about an extremely minor issue like that. You are completely ridiculous...... Thankfully for us we have been without your stupid legalistic interpretations for quite some time. And no its not a stretch, our current Emissary would handle a similar situation in his sleep.
[/quote]
Our 'very own shortbowe' is in no way connected to TOP except for his alliance being at war with the same alliances we are. You should know he is not a member of TOP and thus, i can not tell him to do anything without infringing on his sovereignty (see, we do learn our lessons). I'm afraid that to me, anyone that wishes to run for government (which is generally a large charitable contribution with little thanks) is a loyal member of an alliance. The fact your alliance continued to select her as a member of your government means that either you were a minority in not considering her loyal, or you had no other options. If the latter is true, maybe that is why she continued in the role?
You should also note that when Crymson was re-elected, our electorate was relatively uninformed about the Kronos/STA affair and the effect it had on relations with Kronos. I was our main point of contact at the time and i had some severe internet connectivity problems and thus could not keep tabs on the situation. Yes, that's a bad show on us that one member was the only real direct contact we had, but we have most definately learned from that mistake. The treaty was also cancelled post election, so the extent of any damage was not at that time clear. -
[quote name='Bob Sanders' date='08 March 2010 - 07:58 AM' timestamp='1268035367' post='2217818']
So in your opinion someone holding the position of Emissary shouldn't need to be able to handle a basic noob rogue case? I'm telling you flat out that Sky was incapable of handling such a situation when no other gov was around. Instead she attempted to pull me out of retirement because she wasn't quite sure what to do about a war between two nations under 1k NS.
I can't think of a more basic FA situation that could exist on Planet Bob.
I didn't even bring up the fact that she was essentially a stool pigeon for TOP while sitting in Valhalla's gov for months clumsily trying to influence our FA in favor of TOP. Of course you already know that and I'm sure you will repeat some sort of hollow denial. TOP is nothing but a backstabbing, traitorous alliance that liked to push around its now former allies(see Kronos-STA reps fiasco recently) and that finally caught up with you. The only thing bittersweet about TOP getting rolled is that I dislike some of the people fighting TOP almost as much as I dislike TOP. Luckily I can take solace in the fact that you are dishing out massive damage on the way down.
[ooc]By the way my grammar is just fine. I'll just assume that you haven't read anything that I have ever written other that that singular IRC quote. The fact that you brought that up just shows how pathetic you are. [/ooc]
Please explain in detail how that quote affected my ability to run Valhalla's military because that is the only gov position I have held in Valhalla. I eagerly await your response. Until then I'll just take solace in the fact that your supposed "gotcha" line had zero effect on how I did my job. Sky's history on the other hand is completely relevant to the position she currently holds.
[/quote]
I would like to remind you that Sky has been in TOP almost a year since she left Valhalla. She has come on leaps and bounds since than and been able to work with some highly experienced players. I've seen her conduct in peace negotiations and other FA interactions with both friendly and unfriendly alliances and i have 100% faith she will perform her duties with excellence.
I have no doubt that Sky tried to convince Valhalla to be supportive of TOP (to what extent, i don't know) but that is surely expected when she later joins the alliance. Maybe that action hints that she was in one way or another fond of TOP? I think it's pretty standard for people to want to be aligned to alliances they like.
My advise is for you to look up sky's [i]recent[/i] history in FA and take a look at what the people in this forum (which, may i remind
you is a center for FA)think of Sky. Perhaps their visions of how she conducts FA differs to yours?
Edit: Quick shout out to ma homies for believing in me. And my producer, my director and my mom of course! Love you mom! -
am i the only one not suprised?
-
[quote name='flak attack' date='24 February 2010 - 04:54 AM' timestamp='1266987501' post='2200572']
Oh, so you're right in wanting to damage us for no reason, but we're wrong for expecting you to pay for that damage?
[/quote]
where did i say we had no reason? We would come in to help neutralise a future threat in the polar - \m/ war. There's your damn reasoning.
But i already know that you wont accept that.
-
screw it - not worth it.
GOONS Recognition of War with NPO meatshields/vassal states
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
[quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1296108116' post='2604859']
No. I detect some kind of crying over spilt milk but it is hard to determine.
My ''word'' was worth exactly what Crymson's was... nothing. I haven't lost a seconds sleep over your alliance.
My honour? You wouldn't understand honour if it bit you on the end of your primary apendage. Snake in the Grass much.
TOP MUST DIE
[/quote]
I imagine we'd be glad to hold some form of alliance duel later down the line when you've recovered from the latest war.
Personally i'm not too interested in working out a whole plan to take down alliances, duel's seem much more dignified.