Jump to content

andymac64

Members
  • Posts

    219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andymac64

  1. [quote name='baskan' date='29 March 2010 - 05:30 AM' timestamp='1269837020' post='2239797']
    FIGHTERS OF WAPA, JOIN ME IN THIS REBELLION TO STRIKE THE EVIL ANDYMAC(you know i wub you). WE STRIKE TONIGHT AGAINST WAPA AS THE WAPAian REBELLION. FOLLOW ME INTO BATTLE, TO VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!
    I ASSUME COMMAND WITH AUCTOR AND BURNSEY OF THE WAPA REBELLION! WE ARE THE JUST THE BEGINNING FRIENDS WE HAVE ORGANIZED HITS ALL OVER!
    FOR WAPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Also watch out all allies of WAPA ;)

    [img]http://www.guzer.com/pictures/good_luck_sign.jpg[/img]
    ^^^^
    Way to success

    P.S. STRIKE ANY NON-FOLLOWERS TONIGHT AT UPDATE! please sign in below too ;)

    CURRENT REBELLION MEMBERS(The public ones at least):
    Baskan
    Auctor
    Burnsey
    Xenon
    JC
    Slicey
    :WAPA:




    Disclaimer:If anyone raids a WAPA member while we are hammering each other. We'll all turn on them so fast their heads'll spin permanently

    (if you don't get the title check this [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Culloden"]Scotts fight it out[/url] and if you don't believe us. check the We Are Perth Army war page in CN TE. Should be some people hitting each other. But some are lazy and will hit tomorrow.I am also warning AZTEC and Flying Kiwis.)
    [/quote]


    This is in public? You are worse than I've said. WAPA? You wouldn't know what it meant.

  2. [quote name='HisK Owns You' date='15 March 2010 - 02:42 PM' timestamp='1268664469' post='2226296']
    PU peaced out with LE thanks to me. Now I wished I didn't do it.
    [/quote]

    We thought PU were in too.

    Sorry to the guy I anarchied. :blush:

  3. [quote name='HisK Owns You' date='15 March 2010 - 02:42 PM' timestamp='1268664469' post='2226296']
    PU peaced out with LE thanks to me. Now I wished I didn't do it.
    [/quote]


    And we declared on PU too.

    Sorry for the guy I anarchied. :blush:

  4. 'Scots, wha hae wi' Wallace bled,
    Scots, wham Bruce has aften led,
    Welcome tae yer gory bed,
    Or tæ Victory.
    'Now's the day, and now's the hour:
    See the front o' battle lour,
    See approach proud Edward's power -
    Chains and Slavery.
    'Wha will be a traitor knave?
    Wha will fill a coward's grave?
    Wha sæ base as be a slave?
    Let him turn and flee.
    'Wha, for Scotland's king and law,
    Freedom's sword will strongly draw,
    Freeman stand, or Freeman fa',
    Let him follow me.
    'By Oppression's woes and pains,
    By your sons in servile chains!
    We will drain our dearest veins,
    But they shall be free.
    'Lay the proud usurpers low,
    Tyrants fall in every foe,
    Liberty's in every blow! -
    Let us do or dee.


    CDT, The Vault, Purple Unity all fighting LE?

    Let's even up sides a bit.

    WAPA goes to war in defence of LE.

    Might be a Kiwi along in a minute. :P

  5. Sad to see him go.


    As for deleting an entire alliance for sharing a network?

    I guess that means every workplace, everycampus and every internet cafe is now off limits.

    Crazy.

    But its ok as membership of cybernations is rising, oh wait.....

  6. [quote name='Lusitan' date='10 February 2010 - 08:56 PM' timestamp='1265835394' post='2173127']
    We are sorry for that, but considering accepting that agreement would be a suicide declaration. WAPA top nations outmatch us in infrastructure levels. Fighting only conventional wars would be impossible for us. On the other hand, we outmatch WAPA in tech per capita and WRCs (difference of 11 if I recall out of 18). Adding to that, WAPA's warchests - or lack of - make them fine targets to be put in bill lock through Nuclear Anarchy considering some of the nations with >12k infra have less than 10 million stored.

    It is therefore in our best interest use nukes against you instead of allowing you to punch us to dead with your inflated numbers. When the choice of either being beaten to death or nuking you so we can have an advantage this war is presented to us... well, the answer is obvious :P
    [/quote]


    And we are not compaining.

    Actually, this is much easier. Enjoy.

  7. When WAPA entered this war we agreed a no Nuke policy with NATO, nothing like a friendly war.

    When GUN came to NATO's defence we agree to extend this to them.

    When TFD entered we offered the same terms. TFD refused and since then we have been happily eating a breakfast of a nuke from TFD followed by conventional attacks from NATO and GUN. Quite a painful way to start the day.

    TPF entered the fray with clearly nucleur intentions (confirmed today).


    However, we have stuck by our original agreement with only three nations breaking it (One from NATO, Two from WAPA).


    As Gun have now withdrawn from this agreement (or at least said that they give will give no notice of cancelling) and NATO telling me they don't want it, it seems only prudent that we repsond in kind.


    WAPA now cancels its agreements with NATO and GUN.

    And please note this is 3.5 hours after update.

  8. [quote name='Captain Canuck' date='07 February 2010 - 02:53 AM' timestamp='1265511217' post='2165807']
    WAPA came in by not honouring a treaty with someone who needed it more because they decided they wanted to be on the winning side of the war no matter what.


    @Shmeestar, AUT, and andymac: that's not actually correct, TFD isn't called that because of where its members live (and really, most of them are in North America, just a high percentage of the leadership is European).
    [/quote]

    No. Sorry we didn't want to 'Be on the winning side' If that was so I would not have limited aggression. How many nukes were used? You at the back, you can answer. Well done, zero is the right answer.



    We are here because we stand by the people who stand by us. End of story.


    And the other bit was a wee joke between WAPA bods.

×
×
  • Create New...