The Chief
-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by The Chief
-
-
1 hour ago, LJ Scott said:
It's multi level because it's eight quotes and you've realised it's equitable to one point. One point in eight sounds familiar...
Sounds familiar to me also exactly the amount of GA’s you’ve won against me haha
-
25 minutes ago, LJ Scott said:
Words in your mouth? It'd be more difficult to infer you weren't talking about Polar.
In response to my post suggesting we'd wait to see who supported WAPA you stated that no one would (because of Steeldor) and then suggested that (why no one would support) was because everyone was "pixel hugging pussies". So either you were directly calling them out singularly, or indirectly calling them out as part of the wider community. For what it's worth I think it was probably a freudian slip of the former if not intentional.
Also enjoying the accusation of adding to the OWF's aurora as a cesspit with my comment highlighting that LYDIASLAND being a literal cringelord. Especially when reflecting on the WAPA comments in this thread referring to others as a "prepubescent child", "children", "disrespectful prick", "tool", "disrespectful dick", "Franz the Fud", "disrespectful dicks" and "pixel hugging pussies".
I thought prepubescent child was a fair assessment, the rest does fit quite well in the cesspit I agree
I think your cipher proves the childish point fairly well
-
2 hours ago, LJ Scott said:
I can see why Polar where so keen to sign with yourselves when you consider them to be "pixel hugging pussies".
The community of 2009 might have been outraged and done something, but 10 yrs on no one cares (or rather no ones here to care). Besides the fingers on the switch and it's nearly time to turn off the lights on Bob.
Now your putting words in my mouth, that’s just not cricket now is it LJ
The community is in the state it’s in because of the ridiculous treaty web of the past, those that used it to their advantage done so very well. But it led us here.
Your just a a bundle of joy to converse with, at least your keeping the tradition of the OWF being a cesspit alive till the lights go out
-
5 hours ago, Franz Ferdinand said:
If I did, I'd probably get mistaken for Dundee! 😀
I hope you washed your mouth out with soap after that
-
1 hour ago, LJ Scott said:
We've knocked. Wapa answered. We'll see if anyone else does. Literally the simplest way of checking imo.
Nope asking is definitely easier,
I’m fairly sure the fact Steeldor and his pals are kicking around guarantees no one else turns up, so called raids during a war would have been torn to pieces by this community not so long ago, but times have changed and the place is full of pixel hugging pussies willing to sit and watch a few nations do as they please.
Wapayabass
-
43 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said:
Incorrect, typically the first place to check is on the alliance's forums. If it's not there, to check the wiki https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/We_Are_Perth_Army which admittedly hasn't been updated since 2015 with the exception of any treaty blocs that WAPA used to be in. Next up is to check the Polaris wiki: https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/New_Polar_Order which was last updated on November 17th 2018 but did not contain the WAPA treaty. Finally, I did a lookup on the forums and could not see the treaty which Earl Dumarest posted (I tried WAPA, Perth and We Are Perth Army as search terms which did not show the thread.
Either way, the treaty seems to be an ODP so WAPA aren't under the protection of Polaris but instead could call on their assistance if they so desire. As this whole place has been in decline for around 3 or more years, it makes sense why the treaty didn't show up or wasn't updated at any of the aforementioned places.
Anyway, have a good fight WAPA.
Seems like a lot of effort to me, shouldve just asked 😉
-
19 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said:
You probably should amend your treaties section on the forums in that case.
Think you may be the only person to have visited the forum in years but you are absolutely correct MRr FF.
im amazed it’s still there
-
10 minutes ago, HiredGun said:
Tell them to come try that in TE. 😀
A level playing field, why on earth would they do such a thing. They would actually have to fight their own battles
-
6 minutes ago, HiredGun said:
It appeared to be a good match up but now they've bought in DBDC under the guise of a "raid".
It’s CN, WAPA learned long ago how this game works, it’s a place where the weak can gang up together to feel strong.
Wapayabass
-
1 hour ago, Earl Dumarest said:
That lassie from STA. Where is she now? She used to be much better at insulting you!Haha pezstar she was a big Rickardo fan
-
21 minutes ago, LJ Scott said:
An utter cringelord evidently.
He has his moments
-
We are bored, the war cry of the prepubescent child before they go and draw on the wall .....
wapayabass
Tosh
-
Variety is the spice of life, new drinking partners are always welcome especially ones with a bit of class
My round
-
Tosh Pops in, shakes head, feels a little pity. Decides it's time to leave again.
-
Canik your obvious disdain towards WAPA is neither here nor there, if you had reached out to us and we had rebuked or ignored any talks I could understand it, but as it stands there has been as much effort on your part as there has been on ours.
Will WAPA go back to doing very little, quite possibly as is our right, you don't get to decide how anyone else gets to play and we have endured a very long time playing our way. Which by doing very little also includes not raiding nations on the white team that appear weak or vulnerable, we've also at no point attempted to extort any alliances that appear to be weak or vulnerable.
I look forward to going our business in any manner manner we see fit and to be left in peace to do so.
Regards
-
4 hours ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
This. Since not everyone is on the same schedule, expecting immediate results from these talks is unrealistic when they're occurring over private messages. However I expect there will be peace soon.
i already mentioned yesterday i would work on it in this thread and that's what I've been doing, so I don't see a need to keep repeating the same line.
Noctis I have replied in game regarding peace
-
7 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
No, I thought you were an ally and causally asked if you thought Umbrella would have our back fighting them; in order to find out your thoughts on the situation and what our alliance should expect. I requested you did not intervene when you responded with a bunch of threats. I only mentioned it to you because I was causally discussing the war with a friend in Umbrella and he said he would bet Umbrella would want to assist and I should message you.
As soon as Bunnet declared on Alonso he started threatening us with Umbrella, so the facts are your MoD thought he could raid at will without any retribution, because Umbrella would sort his mess.... classy
-
The raid and reply
Alonso's very active raiding history
source https://cybernations.lyricalz.com/war?nation1=576175&nation2=
You can can try to defend the indefensible, pity you can't defend your own alliance
-
10 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
If they didn't want a full scale war, they would have at least spoken with us first to explain their grievances. Instead they attack without talking with us and right away escalate to targeting everyone on our AA when a nation countered and refused to discuss peace.
When they're trying to portray us offering peace before it escalated further as "begging for peace", it doesn't seem like they have a serious interest in peace even now. I never beg and if offering peace is begging, don't be surprised when we're not motivated to offer peace.
I contacted you regarding peace, the day before Canik decided to try and extort our alliance, you didn't reply because you knew they were coming by this time. Which is also why the mass exodus to Junkas alliance didn't happen.
o: Noctis Lucis Caelum From: The Cheif Date: 5/12/2017 7:55:13 PM
Subject: Hey NoctisMessage: it's time we opened up some dialogue,
I spoke with mrmarx earlier, he sent me some gov, your FA so I came to you.
I have some work to do my side to get to a resolution but I don't see it being impossible. Some of the trash talk appears to have got people a little upset. The way of the world I suppose.
Where you guys at ?
Tosht -
6 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
I'll be here forever if I'm going to be correcting all your lies, so enough with the attention seeking and come out of peace mode sometime.
It takes two minutes to correct what you see as lies not too difficult if that's the case
I will be out of peace mode soon enough when I restock, after your friends knock me down a bit I'll coming knocking of that you can be assured. Better get some food in because I'll be staying a while.
Wapayabass
-
I'm going to lay out the facts
Alonso raided us twice
we responded by sending one nation Bunnet to redress the balance
Alonso then threatened him and told him to leave our alliance and take over his position in your alliance
you then declared another war on Bunnet
An act of war to which we responded
you cried.......lots
begged me to let your nations leave to Junkas alliance for safety, which I was working on.
Cried some more
Sent another alliance to beg for peace, which I was working on.
Cried a little bit harder
Finally found an alliance daft enough to help Fellowship of the Wolves, decided to ask for £500m and 5k tech because you thought they would win it for you.
And here we are WAPA would rather die with honour than pay your sorry ass one brass farthing
Wapayabass
-
1 minute ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
This argument could go in loops forever on them bringing in their friends after attacking us and that being alright for them. However when we bring in our friends in response, its an outrage since they're losing. So I'm done arguing in loops here.
We're not losing .... yet...... the numbers dictate we will, depending on how you quantify winning and losing. To die with your principles is success
-
4 minutes ago, Noctis Lucis Caelum said:
Except when our friends who have no treaty with you guys help us, its a terrible thing. lol
When you can't abide by your own rules and get yourself in trouble
Sure
when you have a 2-1 advantage and require a 6-1 advantage, terrible maybe, embarrassing definitely
-
Read your own sig
A MHAnnouncement, A Harmless Statement
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Bunnet works nights I’m just a sad bastard