Jump to content

Marsupial Bob

Members
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Marsupial Bob

  1.  

    34 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

    Death cults do seem to be all the rage these days don't they?

     

    Everybody needs a hobby.

    6 minutes ago, Sabcat said:

    Front? There's one of you. You're a front in the same way the kid who lives above my local shop and sells weed is a cartel. 

    It's a small front. A frontlet, if you will. But the guys printing the stationary for me charged by the letter, so here we are.

  2.  

    On 5/22/2019 at 9:35 PM, kingzog said:

    Oh boy. A one-man AA.

     

    Newsworthy.

    To be fair, I'm awesome, and everything I do is fabulously important.

     

    Or if you don't buy that one, you're welcome to join up and start chucking nukes as well. It'd be twice as irrelevant then.

     

    On 5/22/2019 at 7:39 PM, The Big Bad said:

    I think I got this out of my system killing Norden Verein in 2008.  Have fun though I am sure they will appreciate a little action.  

    I thought I had it out of my system in '08 as well...unfortunately they came back. But I'm perfectly happy to do a bit of public service around here and see how many nukes it takes to get to the center of a Nordreich.

     

    11 hours ago, General Kanabis said:

    Have fun... if you start to feel like your pixels are in danger, you can always go hide in CLAWS like the last person who tried it.

    I have very little attachment to my pixels, and enough money to keep nuking Nordreich for a good while. But feel free to quote this back at me with all due mocking if I run off to CLAWS.

  3. GOD is dead, but there's still good works to be done... and The Iron Front is here to do 'em.

     

    We're gonna be doing one thang and one thang only … killing Nordreich. Now, I don't know about y'all, but I sure as **** didn't come down from the god**** Smoky Mountains, cross five thousand miles of water, fight my way through half of Sicily and jump out of a ****in' aeroplane to teach Nordreich lessons in humanity. Nordreich ain't got no humanity. That's why any and every sum***** we find flyin' a Nordreich flag... they're gonna die.

     

    Anyone is welcome to join. But once you do, I want some Nordreich scalps, y'all...

  4. 1 minute ago, Caustic said:

     

    Our loyal carrier pigeon, pudding, is en route with the message as we speak. Pudding is a slow creature, but it'll get there eventually.

    Might want to have it drop by NoR on the way; I'm having great fun hitting people in DEFCON 5 with no military buildup. Apparently blitzkrieg tactics don't necessarily come with the territory...

  5. 1 hour ago, Abshire said:

    Additionally, the Signatory Alliances take this specific action, among a variety of options, because we have developed a particular distaste for both of the declared upon alliances, which, though we don’t quite remember many of the specifics, has persisted despite the passage of several years.

     

    You may have forgotten your history, but not all of us have.

     

    Anyone who fights under the Odal rune - or in lockstep with those who do - will always be my enemy.

     

  6. You'd think GOD would understand coalition warfare after, what, 6 years of participating in it?

     

    The treaty web is so $%&@ed up nowadays that there's always going to be an alliance (or many) with treaties on both sides of the conflict. Just nut up and deal with it. Or isn't that what you told RoK during VE-NpO?

     

    !@#$@#$ hypocrites.

     

    You mean that time we DoW'd a RoK ally against a prior agreement, then posted the DOW with a message taunting RoK about their inability to defend allies?

     

    Oh, wait...

     

     

     

    You missed the point and picked up only the ad homium there, numbnuts. Try to read through the insults and learn something for once in your sordid existance. See this line? Ignore it. It's for my benefit. And the practice in ignoring irrelevant bits will probably be good for your reading comprehension. Certainly can't hurt it.

     

    The point:

     

    If targeting an ally of mine is necessary - and it sometimes is - I do not expect my coalition partners to call my alliance out by name to taunt a friendly alliance. GOONS left us in a place where we could either 1) do nothing, prove their taunt right, and damage a longstanding alliance tie with people we actually like, or 2) stand by a longtime friend when their attackers called out our absense.

    The personal attack:

    In short, if you are a &$%* to your coalition partners, don't be surprised when they call you on it and join the opposition.

     

     

    See the substance in the first quote? The acknowledgement that sometimes we have to fight coalitions containing friendly alliances? Followed closely by the actual reason that I might be annoyed? Yeah, try addressing that. The insults are purely for my entertainment.

  7.  

     If you want to defend each and every ally who gets attacked regardless of coalition warfare, than you are a piss poor coalition partner, placing your interests above the coalitions.

     

    Speaking entirely for myself and not for alliance leadership:

     

    I am aware of what a coalition is and does. I am aware that the treaty web is such that all our friends are rarely - if ever - on the same side of a coalition war. That is an unpleasant fact of war here, and one which has to be accepted when entering with a coalition.

     

    I do not expect my 'partners' in a coalition to deliberately target my allies when it is not necessary. If targeting an ally of mine is necessary - and it sometimes is - I do not expect my coalition partners to call my alliance out by name to taunt a friendly alliance. GOONS left us in a place where we could either 1) do nothing, prove their taunt right, and damage a longstanding alliance tie with people we actually like, or 2) stand by a longtime friend when their attackers called out our absense.

     

    To my view, we did not fire the first shot in this. GOONS made a deliberate statement which - if we stayed with the coalition - was designed to damage GOD's diplomatic ties and future standing with R&R - an alliance we value. We have responded in the only manner available to us.

     

     

    In short, if you are a &$%* to your coalition partners, don't be surprised when they call you on it and join the opposition. If you'd like to drop by our forums I can spell that out for you far more colourfully, but I think that covers the basics well enough.

  8. As it is, this feels more like Sardonic calling you out and you guys confirming you have a pair of 2s.

     

    Well, if it turns out GOONS doesn't have the 7-2 off they seem to be showing so far, then we'll take those 2s and give 'em a papercutting like they've never seen before.
     

     

    Pretty sure that analogy has another post or two in it before it gets completely run into the ground...

  9. I am looking for a long-term arrangement to buy tech at $6m/195 tech. This maintains a closer approximation of the old $3m/100 tech deals in terms of cost/benefit for both parties, but is significantly quicker.

     

    This would be $6mil initial aid, followed by 3 rounds of 65 tech. I get slightly less tech than 2 rounds of $3m/100, buyer cost is slightly higher, but the process is 20 days quicker.

     

     

    I am looking for 1 reliable, long-term seller. Message in game http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=228566

  10. [quote name='Velocity111' timestamp='1323716978' post='2875399']
    I, for one, welcome the removal of these individual surrender terms and support the continual rolling of GOD :ehm:
    [/quote]

    Works for me.

    [quote name='bandnerd' timestamp='1323713277' post='2875350']
    why yes, we ARE cute cuddly bunnies. provided you can ignore the switchblade.
    [/quote]
    Why on earth would I ignore the switchblade? That's great; a rabbit that comes with its own peeler... stew anyone?

  11. [quote name='Striderwanabe' timestamp='1323671164' post='2874941']
    As GOD has always been an irrefutable defender of all that is decent and moral in the Cyberverse, I'm sure that BN, NEAT and SC have been shamed into reconsidering their terms. Not really.

    Keep up the good fight you guys.
    [/quote]
    Because Nordreich is a bastion of moral decency...

  12. [quote name='Aloop' timestamp='1323234214' post='2866851']
    It's somewhat disappointing to have the chance to fight MJ, then end up fighting the MJ alliances we're OK with.
    [/quote]

    This; I can't even whittle away my scalp-debt now. Still need a hundred of the bloody things.





    Also, just as a preliminary note, nice to meet you BN; it's a welcome change to have somebody vaguely competent in the opposition. Riding in next to Asgaard just highlights the difference.

  13. [quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1318825741' post='2826894']
    Well, if you give us a good CB on that alliance I'm sure we'd take you up on that offer. We takes what we can gets! Not our fault they've been easy targets with allies that are cowards (in the case of UPN).
    [/quote]
    "You can always judge a[n] [s]man[/s] alliance by the quality of his enemies."

  14. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1308665273' post='2737229']
    His repeated attempts to force an alliance to disband will end up being disastrous for his alliance. That’s an ego trip that just hasn’t caught up with him yet and when it does I don’t think anyone will be saying he only made the right choices.
    [/quote]

    I always wonder about this. Do none of you see the irony in implying that we'll be forced to disband GOD as punishment for advocating other alliances be forced to disband?


    And if 'disastrous' isn't meant to imply disbanding, then frankly it's meaningless; anything you can do we can rebuild. Short of forced disbandment there's very little I would consider disastrous.

    Pixels come and go; GOD does not.

  15. [quote name='gambona' timestamp='1308588234' post='2735929']
    Flinders if you think you are upset, think of how Asgaard feels. No one has directed any insults or threats our way. We demand our share of insults and threats!
    [/quote]

    Well I would say Surtr's coming for you, but I'm pretty sure an Asgaard/Ragnarok alliance has already skull-@*%#ed the natural order too far for that to work.

    So instead:

    See you in Helheim. And bring enough mead for all of us.

×
×
  • Create New...