foxodi
-
Posts
335 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by foxodi
-
-
If this holocaust you speak of is designed to destroy the world and rebuild the political landscape, I applaud it.
But its just double-standards applied to an old enemy who has already paid for their sins, in order to remove a potential threat. Using such double-standards, you obviously believe you do not require any more political allies; in which case I look forward to the next several years as people move away from you and the next cycle of CN power-struggle commences. -
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1295706765' post='2591849']
NEW in relations with Razorade?
Poor NEW.
[/quote]
This is what I'm thinking. Congratz to both
-
This is a good fit.
Congratz to both International and C&G -
War on an entire alliance for a rogue-incident that happens pretty damn often and is routinely concluded by diplomacy.
Clearly a "might makes right" approach, on a rather defunct but peaceful alliance. Poor show. -
Everyone likes the gutsy top-heavy alliance, but sometimes they turn out to be beyond foolish (nocb aggression), unreasonable (refuse diplomacy) and inconsiderate of their allies.
Wise decision iFok, you had no other choice. -
You got 5people on CN within 30mins and made them follow such simple commands.
I am impressed NEW. But I'm gonna have to agree with Bob Janova here. -
[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1292913084' post='2547918']
[img]http://www.abtirsi.com/wardeclared.png[/img]
I post this every war, yet it never stops being relevant
[/quote]
While I agree that is win, this may be one of the few times it isn't relevant - since there's alot of unification that it was blatant unjustified aggression. -
I laugh at those claiming "evil curbstomp!!!!". Like this is somehow worse then NEW raiding a recently disbanded AA that they knew was protected.
NEW, karma war wasn't personal for DF - its a shame that you guys held such a grudge from it. -
ITT: People never seen Gundam 00
Totally agree with RV, doing the moral thing makes you disgusting. -
Normally I mock NPO's propaganda pieces, but this satire is starting to bite imo. Truth hurts. QQing about lack of humor is pretty poor defensive tactic
-
A step in the wrong direction, though I'm sure you are all &*&^ing in the pants with Umbrella's posts in here
Being eaten or disbanding are the only real choices. Does anyone even play Darkfall? -
A difficult position you are in.
Respect. -
Old Guard, LoSS and Troy are black
The Immortals are maroon
Good job on the stats, cheers. -
Onwards soldiers.
Black Unity. -
I was waiting for some noir declarations
-
[quote name='Chron' date='01 February 2010 - 03:59 PM' timestamp='1265003962' post='2149894']
it's not like context and past actions are at all relevant, right?
Right?
[/quote]
In relation to this thread the only context that is necessary is our treaty with Aircastle. Everything else is irrelevant/offtopic. -
[quote name='savethecheerleader' date='01 February 2010 - 02:59 PM' timestamp='1265000386' post='2149634']
Ah, I see. Well that clears it up quite a bit then.
[size="1"]But I still disagree... so I must find a way to to criticize it... [/size]
[size="5"]IT'S UGLY AND THERE IS A TYPO[/size]
[/quote]
For a 2min paint job I can accept this -
[quote name='savethecheerleader' date='01 February 2010 - 02:45 PM' timestamp='1264999503' post='2149597']
I understand the general anti-Sith sentiment of the piece but... what? "Stronger then[sic] TOP"- In what way? "Creator of precedents" - which precedents would those be? What does either thing have to do with the NSO content? I suppose the piece is a success if its goal is to leave the viewer vaguely angry at the creator, but other than that...
[/quote]
Stronger then TOP is in reference to the countless posts by NSO that run along this line of thought here: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=79563
NSO has claimed in the past that it has set several new precedents; which is debatable
-
[img]http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/3299/cnprop1.jpg[/img]
Paint. The best tool ever. -
[quote name='Griff' date='01 February 2010 - 12:58 PM' timestamp='1264993101' post='2149220']
That was bad. I mean really bad
[/quote]
Not really, considering the entire thread NSO has been claiming we should have attacked them because TOP is clearly too easy of a target.
NSO is either:
Greatly overestimating themselves
Greatly underestimating TOP
Full of crap
Take your pick -
[quote name='Chron' date='01 February 2010 - 12:44 PM' timestamp='1264992294' post='2149188']
Pick a fight with a real man, then, SCM. I'm waiting for you to say something to me other than "no u".
[/quote]
Your butthurt (and ignorance, which is one and the same) is music to my ears.
Don't ever change man. -
what do you expect from 5 vs 1?
I expect the 1 alliance to ignore the context of the fight for PR purposes.
Furthermore I expected the alliance to realize that it was strictly business and no ill-will was meant. Unfortunately I still await the day for NEW to be respectful, such as TOP has shown here.
But alas, the past shall be left there.
-
What we have here is an alliance running it's mouth consistently and not doing anything to back it up.
For a moment there I forgot which alliance you were talking about
Sure they attacked TOP, whoopdy doo. TOP is already busy.
but NSO will have a walk in the park this war I'm sure.
-
We're not the ones hiding behind NOIR, after all.
lolwut.
You will get plenty of blown up infra this war. Too much of a good thing isn't really a good thing at all.
Imperial Decree from the New Pacific Order
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
ITT: NPO retakes the moral highground, even when they too are not fit to hold it.