Aurion
-
Posts
1,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Aurion
-
-
Crime against human eyes.
All I'm really getting out of your posts is an urge to hail the !@#$ out of STA. That's saying something considering how much I like Monos Archein.
Edit: What jangel said, as well.
-
snip
Which means what, exactly?
It's hardly STA's fault people couldn't execute their staggers correctly. It's well-documented that Peace Mode is an excellent way to re-arm for another round of wars.
On topic: I hope STA gets good terms as an alliance, and cannot help but express my surprise at the people who don't seem to get this announcement.
Really, how many alliances would be willing to throw their members to the wolves?
-
These havent even been agreed upon by Fly. I think they have some problems with several parts of it.
That's a problem.
Oh, to be a fly on that metaphorical wall.
-
The font for the terms makes my eyes hurt
Outside of that, hooray peace, hooray good terms.
-
This is an outrage! Such criminal behavior cannot be tolerated
Hali? O\
Good on you OTF (No, I'm not guessing
), Fark's great folks. -
~Snip
Why hello there! This was certainly worth its own thread.
Oh, wai-
Edit: BAPS was one of the first alliances involved against SOLID, too...
* Aurion facepalms so hard he loosens a tooth
Uh oh, guys. Bart Simpson has DEMANDED AN APOLOGY. Better heed his words BAPS, he is very powerful and super cereal.He's super duper cereal, guise!
-
Hurray Willpower. Hurray redstripe!
Which leads back to "Hurray Beer!"
The cause and solution to all man's problems
-
Good luck with real life, Ephriam Grey. RL should always trump CN.
-
OTF, y'all did good.
No one can possibly fault you for doing all in your power to honor treaties.
Best of luck going forward.
-
You guys do know that =LOST= is a signatory to the Complaints and Grievances Union, right? You should already be at war with them, at least I think you should be
Damned massive war web.That said, you need to better control who your members attack if you want to avoid war. Or at least get them to stop when you tenatively get a ceasefire.
That would work too.
-
o/ GOD
o/ Andromeda
o/ Different Paths
Hey GOD did you know if you cancel any treaty it means your hitting VE crazy right?
News to us.
-
This is kind of amusing, how people seem to think we have some sort of ulterior motive
The reasons are there. Hell, you shouldn't even have to look all that hard to get at least part of the picture.
Edit: Oh, wait. This is the Open World Forum. Disregard my commentary then
Forgot how rare people actually bothering to think is, instead preferring conspiracy theories.Please, continue. You're amusing.
-
In before Vox.
BAI EPHIE.
What he said.
-
I don't see the problem with sending links to pornographic images as long as they don't have malware. I'm pretty sure i would pay more attention to recruitment messages if they came with free porn
. PS: Just joking
Someone is going to attempt that eventually as a legit recruiting tactic(if it hasn't happened already). It's only a matter of time
-
Snip
Quite the set of rose-colored glasses you have got there.
That said, this is the second thread in a row about mass-messaging/spam messaging where I honestly don't see what the big stink is
-
Right, so when we send recruitment messages it's terrible, but when one of your members spams song lyrics, when another spams stupid videos it's fine. And encouraging other nations to spam us is also fine. So much for double standards.
I think he meant more in that he's sick enough of being spammed that he supports NPO spamming y'all, or something along those lines.
-
Again, what?
That's hardly uncommon in surrender terms at all.
Edit: I r slow poster
-
nice terms but desertion is desertion.
Bad, bad call CCC.
And quite dishonourable.
...
Wait, what? That makes no sense whatsoever. CCC fought well, and neither us nor them wants to see them destroyed.
-
Wow those are some really good terms. You're not even making them pay anything.
What would be the point?
Demanding reparations for an aggressive action seems kind of silly to me.
When you choose to attack someone, you tacitly accept the possible consequences. Demanding money to cover any losses in this situation just seems really stupid and petty.
Also, it isn't like CCC was behaving like a bunch of !@#$%^&*. Quite the opposite, really.
Edit: Grammar is good.
-
OP: Do you speak for any members flying the Confederacy of Imperial States in-game AA, or just yourself?
Call me curious. I know CIS government is long gone, but are you acting as any kind of semi-official spokesman or something?
-
u is rong
The New Pacific Order (as per the Revenge Doctrine) protects red nations from tech raiders without any sort of repayment necessary, implied or otherwise.
Well, alright then.
Still can't say I see what's the big deal about this.
-
You mean TOONS - The Order of Neutral Shoving.
I'm sure TOP is quaking now before your scorching wit and stunning originality.
Also, in before VP spam thread most likely gets locked.
-
Well, gee, I mean it isn't like NPO has been collectively saving the asses of Red Team nonaligned nations for a while now by way of the Revenge Doctrine or anything.
Oh, wai-
Seriously, asking the nonaligned nations they protect by virtue of merely existing to vote for the Pacifican candidates for Red Senate really and truly is a non-issue.
After all, they should expect to get some form of repayment for protection from evil game-ruining tech raiders like me amirite?
Edit: Typing fast is bad for my spelling :\
-
00[16:51] <Aurion> http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=31609
00[16:51] <Aurion> Oh, ffs
00[16:51] <Aurion> Another one.
Followed by quite a bit of laughter.
Really all that can honestly be said, at this point.
), Fark's great folks.
. 
State of things?
in Open World Forum
Posted · Edited by Aurion
You're kind of lucky, really, delaying your exposure to politics.
CN politics makes me want to bash my head through a desk, and I'm just an observer.