-
Posts
250 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Revelation
-
-
I like these odds.
Well i dont think you will like the PC poll.
-
It is unfortunate that PC "Friends you know this is true" doesn't see that Most of TPF Lurvs ya If we must battle.. I prefer it with Distant Cousins than some rag tag bunch of haters. I know mhawk and I know Twist. You are here for different reasons for sure.. but I know that mhawk was sincere in repairing relations with PC. I was unable to dedicate enough time to help in the process.. GreenAcres was Arrogant but I never disliked him.. I respected him for the part he played but I think its sad that AJ has to play GA 2.0 and didn't just reroll GA. As for the future of TPF.. no matter what happens in this war.. the friends and family in TPF will stay strong and together.. we can have 8m NS or 8NS.. that doesn't matter.. we are alliance mates, friends and family. Nothing "green" can change that.
I wish both sides FUN and CIVILITY in this conflict. May we both come out stronger for it.. LETS HAVE FUN!
oo/
Sadly Bridges were burned. The damage was already done when you guys tried to take us out the first time.
-
Many of our members have been waitting for this for a long time.
-
lol not sure i agree or disagree.
-
what a load of cowards
-
No. Who the heck told you that?
You sound like that GPA kid who wanted to surrender to NPO because neutrality means you can't fight back when you're attacked.
I was reffering to there stance not your definition of the word.
-
I hate to have to waste the pixels to say this, but...
The GOP hereby sentences Brookbank to eternal Perma ZI for his attacks on our alliance, trolling of our IRC channel and general !@#$%baggery.
Interesting move for a neutral alliance.
Neutral = Peaceful right?
-
I hate neutrals.
Neutrals get taken out eventually. Neutral = Fail.
I like TPF better then i like Neutrals.
These comments are indirectly related to GOP and not my view of their individual nations.
-
Pretty gutsy move for a guy receiving aid just to keep going.
^^^^this. Give JBone credit for being funny.
-
nice work stumpy.
-
Interesting concept, these duels, sorry I missed out on them.
I wish you were in my range. Anyone in TPF near 60k NS come talk to me if you want to duel.
-
Congratulations guys.
I sure do hope those rumors I keep hearing about your involvement in helping FS plan their 'going out party' leading to their going rogue on FACE turn out to be just that, rumors.
Given the fact that we had previously enjoyed very close relations I'll assume they are just that in the absence of any further proof.
Nevertheless, CTB and Twisted have done a fine job of building an alliance that had solid groundwork laid by greenacres.
Onward to two years, guys.
Regards,
VI
I can assure you they are just rumors. I would not have just sat by if i knew our protectorate was going to attack friends of mine.
-
Yes, they control the red sphere and have decided to protect all unaligned nations residing there. I don't see how their policy is anything close to this. It's kind of like saying people can attack the members of your alliance as long as they only use ground attacks. By your argument that is almost the same as the total protection people receive by being in an alliance.
Ok i understand your argument now.
-
No matter how you try to spin it I've been saying the same thing from the start. I see you are so opposed to me because you hate TOP for some reason. I, however, don't know enough about PC or RAD to have much of an opinion about them. So my reason for posting here is because of my disagreement with this policy.
Do you agree with NPO's policy?
-
Whether or not the NPO raids is an entirely different issue altogether. The fact of the matter is that they do police their team color with a policy just as stringent as this one, if not more so. The only difference between these two policies is that the NPO has more firepower to back up theirs.
Looks can be deceiving.
We are just trying to help protect and improve our color.
-
which is why after talking with PC gov today the guy syrik had attacked for raiding pink was offered reps? If you really think the governments (and perhaps even more importantly your treaty partners) are going to support attacking aligned nations to support a non alliance sponsored treaty I think you are in for a rude awakening. If there was a pink target in my range I would raid it to prove a point.
I wish you would.
-
You got alot of crazy people over on pink so its probly a safe bet not to test this [Doctrine]
-
Yes, because it was fun to do so. I thought that was what we're supposed to be doing. It's clear that Vox is having fun in their own way, why can't we?
I cant wait to have some fun. It will include both our nations and some nukes.
But congrats to TPF on getting the spy and having fun.
-
Waaaaaaaait... is this the Budlight? Maturity and Budlight!? Hahahahahah you kill me man, you kill me. Glad to see you around.
I lol'ed at this.
-
Im not sure why they choose to attack FACE. This is a sad day.
-
Rigggghhhhtt. Where do you think they learned that? NEO and Sparta happened long before PC came into existence.
EDIT: Unfortunately PC didn't learn anything about diplomacy.
Diplomacy comes when both sides have respect for each other......
-
I am happy to see something new in CN. Its become very boring.
-
I love everything about this.
-
Poison Clan was digging its own grave at the time. They were warned by friends and foes alike that their conduct will get them into trouble, yet it continued. These things coupled together are what led to the treaty being canceled.
TailsK thank you for answering my first questions. I only have one more.
What has changed, if anything of Ragnarok view of PC at the time of the cancellation compared to the Poison Clan today?
Peace for NADC and Zenith
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
I have gained alot of respect for Zenith during this war. But i do not believe white peace should have been given so early.