Jump to content

Tankz

Banned
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tankz

  1. I can't say that I support you guys at all considering what you tried to pull with the Writ de Credo in the first place.

    Interesting timing waiting until now to cancel the Writ instead of doing it back when everyone found out what you were attempting to do with it...

    Can you clarify? What exactly is so scandelous about cancelling the Writ de Credo? I thought the entire thing was just an NAP

  2. These alliances didn't even cancel all their treaties with NPO, I expect them to pull a Echelon and declare together by update shocking everyone. Clearly depending on the veil of surprise to dispatch their enemies.

  3. I'm quite confused as to why think UNSC is the victim here.

    They spied on JAMA over prejudices there leader had. There spy (usmarines91) entered JAMA as a member and got them into a war his first week there, which they defended him from rogues. He stole money from there alliance and returned to UNSC right after. During his stay in JAMA he was giving Snipez all sorts of information about JAMA's internal workings (apparently he still had a member account on the UNSC's forum).

    After exchanging messages ingame, usmarines admitted to being a spy under orders of someone else. We find out this someone else is UNSC's alliance leader snipez through an irc conversation.

    Since then two other members of UNSC confessed that there leader planted a spy in JAMA.

    When they tried to confront him with the evidence snipez, not only banned there accounts from his forum but also threatened them with war if they kept pushing the subject.

    You can corroborate what I've said with the evidence posted in this thread: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=39757 (should be read in full)

    And that posted in the DoW thread: http://s391.photobucket.com/albums/oo359/B..._photo/?start=0

  4. A little better I guess. I still would've tried cornering them into admitting it.

    Oh well I have no more reason to be here. (As if I had any to begin with)

    Good luck to all concerned.

    I believe that method was tried here http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=39757

    When JAMA presented there evidence against UNSC, by cornering (as you put it) the UNSC spy into admitting his actions, they were called bullish idiots and there evidence was disregarded since the testimony was under "duress". Even though three people from said alliance admitted that there leader ordered the spying.

  5. I am curious to find out what Alliance in the Cyberverse is the most Liberal and Democratic.

    By Liberal I mean Liberalism "a broad class of political philosophies that consider individual liberty to be the most important political goal."

    And by democratic I mean no permanent leader, elections monthly if not weekly. As well as having the agenda of the alliance being decided by the alliance as a whole and not by elected leaders.

    If you have a list of Liberal and Democratic alliances please rank by how successful they are.

    (Also I am not exactly sure if this is in the right place, if it is not I apologize.)

    If thats how your choosing to define liberal, then I would say FCC.

×
×
  • Create New...