Jump to content

Desert Ratz

Members
  • Posts

    334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Desert Ratz

  1. The way I see this is that Graemlins has just surrendered its foreign policy sovereignty to MHA. MHA still maintains treaties, but Graemlins does not, so informal decisions by Graemlins are superseded by the treaties binding MHA and binding Graemlins to MHA.

    So as of this moment:

    Mushroom Kingdom

    Argent

    Umbrella

    Fark

    FOK

    Of these few,

    Umbrella is bound via MDP with MHA. Fark has a MDoAP with MHA. Argent, FOK, and Mushroom Kingdom no longer have any ties to Graemlins. The previous treaty cancellation with TOP is covered by an MDoAP with MHA.

    So the way I see it, it's a stealth downgrading of Graemlins' ties to Mushroom Kingdom, Argent, and FOK.

    This is interesting and I think lays out the true plans here. Regardless I wish Gramlins the best of luck in their new FA policy. We will see what happens tho...

  2. Hello TBB, long time no talk. I can't speak for everyone but I do miss seeing you around.

    Legion, while I did laugh at the comeback toward DW, it is best not to feed the trolls further.

    The only thing I will add, which really doesn't need to be said, is that 57th attacked our protectorate so in conjuction attacked LoSS. This is nothing but a retalitory response towards 57th and coming to an allies aid. Put your hate for us aside for just 2 seconds, step back and look at the bigger picture here.

  3. <+StarKrunk[NSO]> StarKrunk sucks

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> whut

    <+StarKrunk[NSO]> legion-x[LOSSTrium]: Co_God_Ben[LoSS] Hunter[LoSS]

    <+StarKrunk[NSO]> Say you agree

    <~Hunter[LoSS]> krunk does suck

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> with you sucking?

    <+StarKrunk[NSO]> yes

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> I think we can all agree to that notion

    <~Hunter[LoSS]> horribly though

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> indeed

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> not very well

    <&Co_God_Ben[LoSS]> uses too much teeth

    I think we love this topic too. :)

  4. Some of the alliances that fought along side of you have been dealing for months. We've been dealing with agreeing to back this war based on a set of ideologies that were adhered to for about 5 minutes. We dealt with it when we fought alliances we were assigned to and did exactly as we were supposed to, participating in discussions and planning, only to be told to shut our mouths and "deal with it" when we attempted to voice our concerns over extremely light terms given to alliances who deserved far worse. It was made abundantly clear very quickly in Karma land that only about 5 opinions mattered. So yes, sethb. You're right. The thousands of people who went to war and suffered trillions in losses in a war that was originally presented as one of ideology only to have that ideology slapped from our hopeful faces by folks who lost track of their egos will, indeed, "just have to deal".

    This is true. Though we werent exactly fighting side by side with you, we were however fighting on a different front against four other alliances while losing over a million NS in the progress. We recieved no reps for our sacrifice, not to say we would not do it again, but our word meant little when it came to the "5 opinions that mattered". Be thankful, have some humility, then move on.

  5. And that leads me to my last point. If you are on the side of the Hegemony, or were on the side of the Hegemony, you lost the war. I don't care how your terms of surrender were worded, or how you want to parade around now, but you lost. You sound as dumb and blind as the NPO regularly does when they proclaim they won the First Great War. I don't give a damn what happened after, but with respect to the military conflict you lost. Please do not claim otherwise. You tucked your tail and ran. You know this, because I can point to alliances like TPF and Echelon who continue to fight a bitter battle in loyal defense of their allies. These are men who did not shrink from their duty. They have also lost this war, but they fight. You do not fight. You also lost the war. Please understand this. If you think, for some reason, that you could have won the war, then you would not have left the battle. You would have stayed in, and you would have been ground to dust. If you believe any other reality, then you need help. That's all I am going to say on this matter.

    Best paragraph I have read in a very long time. Very well written.

  6. Wait so there's no catch and it's pretty straight forward.

    The reps aren't that difficult to manage now.

    If they just surrendered now they could be done with the reps after a short time and be on their way. The terms for an alliance NPO's size with the number of nations in peace mode who can comfortably produce twice or thrice as much to fill their aid slots with outgoing aid, are relatively light.

    The longer they try to hold out for terms which suit them, to some how spin this into a victory, the more their compatriots will suffer. Both in fighting the war, and later in paying reparations for their unjustified attacks of the past and of that on OV.

    I have no sympathy for NPO if they let this get out of hand. They have been offered a way out of this war and should take it. If they choose not to all they can expect is what they're trying to avoid, harsh terms.

    I like this man and his answers.

  7. *sigh*

    LoSS and Nemesis were offered a way out of the war by us, shortly after legion peaced out.

    We were not in a position to do the same with TOP/Umbrella etc, as they were still in engaged with Valhalla/OMFG etc at the time.

    LoSS/Nemesis declined. (as expected)

    Fun was had by all. We all glowed a merry green. And yes, your nose was put out of joint, because you somehow thought it uncouth of us, to nuke you (a non-nuke nation), despite the whole war being a full-on nuke-fest.

    uhhh ... o/ Peace :awesome:

    You demanded White Peace then threatened us... wtf do you think we are going to do?

  8. I'm sure you are just one guy talking and not speaking for your alliance, but I do wonder if your alliance would want to have a 1 on 1 dual with BAPS someday. No allies from either side interfering.

    You'd love that, right?

    I dont speak for my alliance but yes, yes I would. I dont think you could say the same though considering you and your alliance used to have the numbers behind your mouth.

    The reason for an apology was simple. BAPS, declared before posting a DoW. We werent looking to humilate them but even something as simple as a "Sorry" was scratched from the peace terms that were agreed upon hours before this was posted. Being "Bitter" and Overlooked as an alliance are 2 different things.

×
×
  • Create New...