Jump to content

Commisar Gaunt

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    515

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Commisar Gaunt

  7. BUYING DONATIONS

    in Black Market

    Posted · Edited by Commisar Gaunt

    I'm looking for donations for September. PM me with your rates of money/tech and I will be willing to negotiate.

    Please PM if interested--willing to start payments quickly!

  10. TPF's Response to Terms Offered

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Do I really have to say the same thing three times?

    Mhawk deliberately wrote the treaty as such so that he could use the same loophole to attack PC at a time of his choosing. The people who run PC aren't stupid, they knew what they were signing just as much as TPF knew what they were signing, and making (yes, making) PC sign.

    PC found the loophole, and used it before TPF had the opportunity. That's where the outrage is from, not that PC violated the treaty, but that TPF didn't get the opportunity to violate it.

    So TPF and her allies have attempted to use this as a way to slander PCs name, I won't say good name because PC really wasn't built to even HAVE a good name, though in continuing to try and slander them, that's only pissed PC off more. PC, since day one, has been hounded by TPF, constantly threatened, constantly told "we COULD kill you, but we wont" and they're trying to further damage PCs name with a treaty mhawk wrote because TPFs purpose for the treaty was found out and used against them.

    If you read my post I was agreeing with you all along but ok!

  14. Cyber Nations, be Cyber Peace?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Ok, forget that then. Even so, think about what is happening to the real world. Nearly all World Powers want peace, not war.

    And I would realize, that obviously some new nations and alliances would be starting wars all the time, but I'm thinking big alliances.

    No I was addressing Bama, carry on

    -Commisar

  15. Cyber Nations, be Cyber Peace?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Well... I mean, I agree with you that world peace would make for a sucky CN. But I disagree that it's even possible. For one, TDO and GPA are anything but new. Neutral alliances always win big after a world war, that's nothing new. And the "nukes are immoral" sigs are jokes, like the "jail brookbank" sigs a while back. :P

    -Bama

    Quite frankly, I don't think you know a thing about this "nukes are immoral" movement.

    -Commisar

  19. A New Age has Dawned

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    As I already said, these things do NOT interwine.

    If they did, any war will be just as immoral as any nuclear weapon. May I add that there have been more people killed by ground attacks in RL than the 2 nukes. The ground attacks are worse on a moral point of view. (In CN, then)

    Also, in this game, nukes do not kill citizens. They kill soldiers, land and infra. Citizens just "leave" the country. Soldiers are meant to fight the war and die for your country Y/N?

    Death, ruination, destruction - is that or is that not the point of war? In CN!

    Yes, I don't care for pixels. In CN!

    CN is not the same as RL. Please learn it. I like humanity in RL. CN is a different thing. CN is a nation building and war simulation.

    Global radiation... It is not realistic in this game. 30 days and it is all gone. The real radiation takes centuries to fade.

    This means that the radiation in this game makes it reasonable to use the nukes. After 30 days, it is all back to normal. In CN!

    This is the big difference between CN and RL nukes. And this is the main reason why people hate nukes in RL. But you don't have to hate nukes in CN because they don't have quite the same effect. It is just the damn name you are afraid of.

    Oh no, nukes kill citizens. This is yet another sick part of how nukes work in CN--the citizens are the nameless victims.

×
×
  • Create New...