Jump to content

Railic

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Railic

  1. [quote name='alyster' date='08 June 2010 - 06:12 PM' timestamp='1276045906' post='2329415']
    You made me read few lines like HAHA you clicked, actually we had elections. While this is quite common nowdays, does it really hurt you to post election results with the correct headline? I mean people who don't care won't be mad and people who care will read it anyways.


    Nothing against you, this is just the point for me where I had enough of "interesting" elections :v:
    [/quote]


    Yes, yes it does hurt me. In fact I cry at night when people make things easy for others.

  2. [quote name='James Dahl' date='08 June 2010 - 02:00 PM' timestamp='1276030816' post='2329149']
    Hey I remember you, I fought you in that godawful mess a few months back.
    Congrats on your gov position :)
    Still haven't rebuilt fully >_>
    [/quote]


    Thanks. And yeah, that was me. Good times. :D

  3. [img]http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn222/kgradert/CN/argentnukesymbol6.png[/img]

    That's right. I left the description blank just to make you click this. Haha.. you thought this was something interesting...

    We've held some elections and some positions changed. So here they are

    Emperor: Janax
    Regent: Rustynail

    Minister of War: Otter
    Minister of Finance: Computra
    Minister of Foreign Affairs: Freedomfight3r

    Minister of Internal Affairs: Poobah
    Minister of Communications: Railic
    Minister At Large: Diomede


    The most important change is that Raholia is no longer our Minister of Communications. You guys have to deal with me now. I feel bad for you guys...

    Edit: Now with added flag goodness.

  4. [quote name='RustyNail' date='17 February 2010 - 11:33 AM' timestamp='1266435222' post='2187803']
    I think what my esteemed collegue is trying to say is "A little less talk, a little more action". I'm not seeing him defend anyone or telling you not to blow anyone up, just the incessant talking is getting on his one nerve. And I already abuse that one nerve as it is.

    :smug:
    [/quote]


    And amazingly no one who has replied to me seems to understand this. I love 4 year olds.

  5. [quote name='Van Hoo III' date='17 February 2010 - 11:22 AM' timestamp='1266434562' post='2187779']
    Are you so naive that you believe this current conflict sprouted up just a week or two ago? I hope not. Just because no actual wars were declared yet, it doesn't mean there was nothing going on.

    As I have stated, once this more important conflict is finally over we will then turn our attention to ADI.
    [/quote]


    No, but your constant talking about is tiring, annoying, childish, and downright stupid. Oh wait, children. I forgot. I'll be sure to associate you guys with my 4 yr old from now on. Thanks.

  6. [quote name='Joe Stupid' date='17 February 2010 - 11:14 AM' timestamp='1266434090' post='2187767']
    Ok first off giving swirlies is one of the few enjoyments i still get out of life, and if i didn't steal lunch money, how would i build up my warchest?[/quote]
    Fair enough. Swirlies are quite amusing at times and stealing lunch money is still technically income.

    [quote name='Joe Stupid' date='17 February 2010 - 11:14 AM' timestamp='1266434090' post='2187767']
    But seriously, we're a bit busy at the moment, but it's coming soon enough, but thanks for your concern!
    [/quote]

    You weren't busy for some time while still threatening ADI.
    If you can't handle an alliance 1/6th your size, maybe you bit off more than you can handle? Are you sure your previous decisions were wise at that point? Do you think your future plans are wise after considering that? If not, maybe you should look into it and think for a while instead of spouting random threats for months on end and just being repedative little children throwing fits because someone pushed you a little too hard and you fell on your butt. Man, that blacktop is hard stuff ain't it?

    Edit: some spelling.

  7. [quote name='Tautology' date='17 February 2010 - 11:05 AM' timestamp='1266433521' post='2187757']
    So, you're saying we should back off on our current wars against NEW and TFD and divert our forces towards ADI. Remind me never to give you a job in our military command. :rolleyes:

    I'm really sorry that it's annoying and boring for you, but we don't always base our plans around making some Joe Schmoe happy. Personally, I find the antici... ...pation exciting.
    [/quote]


    You guys have been spouting this crap for over a month. You've had plenty of time to hit ADI before this war even started. ADI is suprisingly small compared to RoK + allies and yet you guys are scared to just wade in and throw down? What kind of people are you? Schoolyard bullies? Are you going to take ADI's lunch money next? Give them a swirly?

    You're children. You act like children. Either man up or shup up.

  8. [quote name='Van Hoo III' date='17 February 2010 - 10:47 AM' timestamp='1266432458' post='2187747']
    It won't be a long wait.
    [/quote]

    You guys keep saying that. It's getting really annoying. What was that saying.. Walk the walk if you talk the talk?

    Either get it over with or shut up. You've had more than enough time to do it. This is just boring.

  9. If our alliance was not so generous and full of people willing to let issues rest then it might have been a ZI situation for that ex-member. Reaching 1 million NS was a much more worthy goal at the time than going all nuke beat-down on one nation.

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *breath....* AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Man that was good.

  10. Nukes are there for a reason, with the odds we are up against we might as well cause maximum damage on the way down.

    Unlike a lot of people who play this game, we aren't that bothered about losing our infra and I'm sure our allies are the same or they wouldn't have entered this war. Nukes will just speed up the process.

    Ok, so I want to clarify this strategy.

    "We don't care about losing infra!" *PEACEMODE!*

    ....

    Yeah...

    More talk, less action!

    Reminds me of grade school.

  11. Nukes are there for a reason, with the odds we are up against we might as well cause maximum damage on the way down.

    Unlike a lot of people who play this game, we aren't that bothered about losing our infra and I'm sure our allies are the same or they wouldn't have entered this war. Nukes will just speed up the process.

    Says the big man in peace mode. Rock on brother!

×
×
  • Create New...