Jump to content

calaustria

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    23

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by calaustria

  1. Looking for new small alliance

    in Player Created Alliances

    Posted

    Well, The Osirian Compact isn't exactly new. We've been around since about three months before vietFAN (and fought in it). We are small, and we're hopefully about to start growing and becoming more active. We're now a protectorate of TPF, and we're working on some treaties with other TPF protectorates. If you wanna stop by, our site is osiriancompact.uni.cc

    Wrongly accused of spying

    in Open World Forum

    Posted

    retarted Wow.

    I suffered in losses for in the FAN war No, the numbers on your computer went down. You felt no pain. Believe me. my Life was the NPO and the NPO is still my life. Well you must be the coolest kid in your entire school. (which I don't doubt is a really pathetic one)

    allaiance Is this your Native American battle cry?

    You should just be kicked out for behavior unbecoming a human.

    A treatis on the need for war and the destruction of the UJP

    in Open World Forum

    Posted · Edited by calaustria

    "The common bonds that unite the alliances of the Unjust Path are the reasons for their inevitable destruction."

    Ahh. So UJP will lose because they have military might and war experience. The two things needed least to win a war huh?

    It's also very nice to see that you tried diplomacy. I have yet to see an alliance (over 5 members) go to \m/ or anyone else in the UJP and ask that they lighten up on unaligned nations. Instead, they just act like they give a damn about unaligned nations so they have an excuse for trying to get rid of alliances that are cooler, stronger, better, and more fun than they are.

    It probably has more to do with registration being closed for extended periods of time.

    Nah, that would be a logical conclusion. We should blame it on UJP.

  9. Spies Input

    in Gameplay Discussions

    Posted

    For those who keep saying, 'steal nukes and cruise missiles and infrastructure. its a game, its not supposed to be realistic.' Well, I hate to break it to you, but its a realistic simulation game. Sorry.

    And you cant exactly go into a nation, pick up a nuke or cruise missile or bridge and walk off with it. :rolleyes:

    Steal, no. But destroying a nuke/cm/infra is fine. That is realistic. A nice bunch of C4 on a nuke, cm, or bridge will do a lot.

  12. Spies Input

    in Gameplay Discussions

    Posted · Edited by calaustria

    Admin, I know it's hard to take into account what everyone wants, and all these omgspaisdontkillnuks and people complaining is annoying. I do admire you for making progress to the game as well. However, there is one thing we've all been begging for since the very start of the espionage thread. Hide all of our personal information such as threat level, tech, soldiers, tanks, etc. and make the spies uncover that stuff. A gather information mission would be pointless as it is, since we already have everyone's information.

    EDIT: A personal idea from me: Don't cancel trades. That would result in epic failure. Instead, show us who the nation is trading with.

  13. Spies Input

    in Gameplay Discussions

    Posted

    I see one big problem. The threat level. Nation's happiness should not go down just because spies are being implemented. IMO, it should be more like this:

    Low (+1.0 population happiness, 75% counter intelligence readiness)

    Guarded (+0.5 population happiness, 90% counter intelligence readiness)

    Elevated (-0.0 population happiness, 100% counter intelligence readiness)

    High - (-1.0 population happiness, 110% counter intelligence readiness)

    Severe - (-2.0 population happiness, 125% counter intelligence readiness)

×
×
  • Create New...