Jump to content

SkonesMickLoud

Members
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SkonesMickLoud

  1. [quote name='Teddyyo' date='16 March 2010 - 08:54 AM' timestamp='1268747966' post='2227271']
    rep·a·ra·tion [rep-uh-rey-shuhn]
    –noun
    1. the making of amends for wrong or injury done: reparation for an injustice.
    2. Usually, reparations. compensation in money, material, labor, etc., payable by a defeated country to another country or to an individual for loss suffered during or as a result of war.
    3. restoration to good condition.

    Source: http://m.reference.com/d/search.html?q=Reparation

    It can mean both, good sir.

    When we talk of CN reparations, it is one and two. Not three.
    [/quote]

    Did you even read that? We both said the exact same thing. Nice to see that you agree with me though, even though you don't realize that you do. Good job. If you stop by later I might even ^5 you.

  2. [quote name='Methrage' date='16 March 2010 - 07:32 AM' timestamp='1268743072' post='2227230']These reps are both very punitive and opportunistic on CnG's part.
    [/quote]

    Main Entry: rep·a·ra·tion
    Pronunciation: \ˌre-pə-ˈrā-shən\
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Middle English reparacion, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin reparation-, reparatio, from Latin reparare
    Date: 14th century

    1 a : a repairing or keeping in repair b plural : repairs
    2 a : the act of making amends, offering expiation, or [b]giving satisfaction for a wrong or injury[/b] b : something done or given as amends or satisfaction
    [b]3 : the payment of damages : indemnification; specifically : compensation in money or materials payable by a defeated nation for damages to or expenditures sustained by another nation as a result of hostilities with the defeated nation[/b] —usually used in plural

    Reps are suppossed to be punitive.

    You do remember that TOP declared on us, right?

  3. [quote name='Alexander Blade' date='31 January 2010 - 12:21 PM' timestamp='1264958518' post='2147814']
    [quote name='flak attack' date='31 January 2010 - 10:46 AM' timestamp='1264952786' post='2147624']
    I was in GPA during that war. I know what getting stomped is like. You're getting stomped just as bad.

    Hell, I could offer that up as an example of IRON partaking in similar levels of overwhelming force, except everyone knew GPA wouldn't be able to fight back. I would have thought you guys would have learned a thing or two from Karma.
    [/quote]

    No. Karma didn't have anything to teach us.
    [/quote]

    Quoted for sheer hilarity.

  4. [quote name='Alexander Blade' date='31 January 2010 - 07:22 AM' timestamp='1264940538' post='2147393']
    Um, no, no, I don't think so.
    [/quote]

    Well, don't you just know everything.

    [quote name='Alexander Blade' date='31 January 2010 - 07:22 AM' timestamp='1264940538' post='2147393']
    Yeah, that's why I said you stood ready. :rolleyes:
    [/quote]

    We're always ready. We're not the GODLIEST MILITARY EMPIRE IN CN for nothin' you know...

  5. [quote name='Alexander Blade' date='31 January 2010 - 07:14 AM' timestamp='1264940069' post='2147381']
    It's nowhere near as simple as that, and you should damn well know it.[/quote]

    It really is.

    [quote name='Alexander Blade' date='31 January 2010 - 07:14 AM' timestamp='1264940069' post='2147381']
    "Out of the blue"? What the #$*%? Both sides were gearing up for war in light of the conflict between NpO and \m/. You knew we had you pegged as a threat. And you stood ready, knowing that if we attacked, you could just call up Uncle Sam and he'd save you from the evil Orange people.
    [/quote]

    Not "out of the blue" as in: "ooh %$#@ we didn't see this coming", but "out of the blue" as in: "lol, those idiots did what?"

  6. It is not garunteed we will attack an offending nation, and I did not say we would just go straight to war with that nation without talking to an alliance's government first.

    So, you just pulled this 99% figure out of thin air?

    If you can truly prove, without a doubt, that your nation is not capable of reading or understanding your rules about recruitment, then surely you could get an exemption.

    You dictate my alliances recruiting rules now? If my alliance says that I can send recruitment messages to anyone that I want to, and I send one to you (by the way, I sent you one, still waiting on that DoW), then surely I should get an exemption too, right?

  7. Some may feel the need to spam us as a test or a knee-jerk prank or whatever--you gotta do what you gotta do. And now we've said what we've gotta do.

    Refreshingly straightforward, in my view.

    The OP has shown that he's not gonna do what "you've gotta do":

    To: SkonesMickLoud From: mattski133 Date: 1/15/2010 2:58:22 PM

    Subject: RE: Whatup Playa?!?!

    Message: right on!

    That doesn't look much like a DoW to me...

  8. Coming from the alliance of where all they need to do is make a thread for something like, "I like to eat cookies." Then having half of Planet Bob respond with, "That's an amazing post, couldn't have sait it better myself."

    Awwwww, you don't like that a good chunk of Planet Bob cares about its Mushroom Kingdom?

    Want a cookie? I like to eat them you know...

×
×
  • Create New...