Sealbhach
-
Posts
37 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Sealbhach
-
-
[quote name='Richard Rahl' timestamp='1301112677' post='2676757']
Unfortunately, you are letting avenger run wild, and it is hurting your entire alliance.
[/quote]
NADC is not a dictatorship.
. -
[quote name='NorthernLights' timestamp='1301081580' post='2676241']
Sucks to be you, NADC.
[/quote]
When you consider how this war started in the first place, it doesn't suck at all. I feel more sorry for TOP, VE and FOK. This conflict may be the end of the civilisation we've carefully built up for years on Planet Bob. Think about what you're doing.
. -
[quote name='steodonn' timestamp='1301013779' post='2675341']
I not in the loop at all these days but MK (at-least) was offering NADC white peace ( + no re-entry )....
[snip]
You had your chance to get out on white peace ( or light reps ) and you said no. I'm happy to continue fighting
[/quote]
We're honouring our treaty obligations as best we can. Our cause is just.
. -
Thank you, honourable friends.
o/ UBD
o/ GDA
. -
Amusing DoW.
Welcome to the party.
. -
I've got one of your guys fighting me that seems to be clairvoyant. He's matched every move I've made so far.
Clairvoyant eh? Which National Wonder is that?
.
-
Good luck BAPS.
You got some nice comments there.
Go n-eirà go geal libh san am amach romhainn.
.
-
You're the one who apparently doesn't care what happens to NADC.
Oh ok. That clears things up.
.
-
Hayzell's got a point. Anyone who had the slightest chance of beating EC in an election (other than Azure) has left the NADC. The fundamental issue with democratically electing a leader is the apathy of the voters.
I don't think you should be criticising anyone for apathy considering you left NADC to become a BLEU POW.
Anyway, best of luck to you whatever you do - just felt I had to get that barb in...
.
-
MCXA you're the bestest ever.
-
However, the point that you only have one known instigator, who the NADC kicked as a traitor and attempted coup artist beforehand, means that significant doubts are still present over the original casus belli. Forcing NADC to hand over their senate seat will also add to the impression that this was a war fought over a minimal infraction to seize complete control of Blue.
Basically, glad to see an end to the war but I still don't think it should have started .
Exactly this. Good to see an objective assessment. (Just my personal view, not speaking for NADC).
.
-
Surely even you could concede that we don't need reasons to do things, we have the power to do so without approval or sanction. It is therefore just as logical to suggest that we are right and are denying you the information to suit ourselves.
You seem reluctant to accept that we can have evidence and not bow to pressure to reveal it, bad luck, we have more resolve than that......
Blah blah. There's an old saying, either !@#$ or get off the pot.
.
-
I'm personally calling it the "ZOMG MEH INFRAz War" or "Not my tecks plz not teh tecks War" but i digress. Thank you OP this is good info to have.
Ha ha!! Yes, most of my tech got scavenged.
Nevermind, we fight on. :jihad:
.
-
Yeah well bollocks to all that.
Bollocks to BLEU and their trumped-up charges.
Even if the allegations were true it was not a valid casus belli.
This war was motivated by greed and envy of NADC power.
NADC is a noble lion beset by craven hyenas.
An apology and reparations would be more fitting.
-Sealbhach of Sliabh Lugha
-
I have Uranium and I have trouble getting trades. But a lot of people are saying Uranium is a REALLY good resource.
There's an income boost of about $9 as well as infra upkeep reduction of 3%.
But it suffers from poor marketing in-game.
Hence I'm at a disadvantage compared to someone with Marble or Iron.
.
-
Anyone that says that uranium is a bad resource EVER is just plain clueless. I love my uranium trade and will keep it and have kept it at max nukes. First off, the income bonus you get while not having nukes is awesome, plus o
you get an infra reduction cost which does large nations alot of good.
Thank you! I think Uranium suffers from poor marketing.
.
-
I've always wondered.. Do you still get the income boost if you switch your government position to: We will never sign such a treaty. Doing so would endanger our people. Our nation promotes the use and build up of nuclear weapons?
No. I've just tried that in my nation and I lose $2.68 in taxes.
.
-
Thanks very much for the replies!.
I've got that now.
.
-
Does it depend on choosing the "nuclear research" option in My Government Position?
Someone said I could get $5.5 income boost from Uranium - how do I make sure I get it?
.
-
Thnaks, thought it had something to do with tech. I approve of the change.
.
-
I used to be able to buy strength 9 aircraft, now it only lets me buy up to strength 3. Can't see any obvious reason why, I have not reached my aircraft limit, my tech is 140.
.
-
Anyone that says that uranium is a bad resource EVER is just plain clueless. I love my uranium trade and will keep it and have kept it at max nukes. First off, the income bonus you get while not having nukes is awesome, plus oyu get an infra reduction cost which does large nations alot of good. Plus I think having the ability to rebuy nukes during a war is invaluable to a nation, especially nowadays. Most nations have to rearrange trades during a war to get access to uranium to rebuy their stocks of nukes, i don't, and it's great.
I've got Uranium and I have terrible difficulty with trades. It's seen as unattractive, esp with the -1 environment.
What's the income bonus?
.
FOK Announcement
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
[quote name='avenger218' timestamp='1301122910' post='2676998']
no matter what I post you guys are going to trash it.
I could post 0's and 1's and you'd still be all over it.
did TOP beat NPO? no, why? because TOP didn't fight NPO, is that an insult? no.
[/quote]
Don't worry about it. It's much ado about nothing.
.