Jump to content

Alrea

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Alrea

  1. A drunken bar brawl

    in Tournament Edition Open World Forum

    Posted · Edited by Alrea

    https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7bhz139D3kTIowg/giphy.gif

    We want to fight, you want to fight, and we saw you eyeing us out. We’re not big believers in having to wait for the guy to work up the courage to throw the first punch to get this brawl started, so here we are. Let’s fight!

     

    TL:DR - DEFCON 1 declares war on Ordo Paradoxia, Planet Tokyo and New League of Nations 

  2. D1 dow

    in Tournament Edition Open World Forum

    Posted

    On 7/21/2018 at 9:41 PM, StevieG said:

    As expected its Defcon1 with the huge down declare yet again.

    You cannot argue this, and you kept stats out of your declare.

     

    And as like Defcon one of old you are breaking your agreements without any discussion.

     

    We all know the real you, you have just proven yourselves.

     

    you cant fight so you turtle and talk !@#$ gg

  3. Imperial Decree - New Polar Order

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Greatest Mothers said:

    In other words here we have another coward who's afraid to accept the "irrelevant" premises :D

    Nobody can win given such premises, and you all know it, that's why nobody is gonna accepting the challenge - thank you for proving my point.

    You did choose the terms of the challenge, after we were already in pm.

    Shaming doesn't work if people don't respect you: you alleged that 3 whole days of inactivity at the beginning of the war is an irrelevant detail. 

    Truth is that nobody can win given such premises, and you all know it, that's why nobody is gonna accepting the challenge - thank you for proving my point.

    Then don't let your dogs to act like they will be at war forever. 

     

    I challenged your whole alliance to a fight, 1vs1, against this nation, under the same premises that your dogs defined as "being irrelevant".

    A wise leader would have see the trap, but you just kept repeating the same !@#$%^&* - that's why you're boring.

     

    My ability is enough to destroy every nation that is inactive for the whole first 3 days of the war, your people just recognized it. So their initial argument was invalid: that's the whole picture.

    Respect is earnt, not a given: every time there's a moron posting here saying they aren't going to accept the challenge they prove my point - my point is that given the first 3 days of inactivity (our fault, our style, we don't care so much) it was impossible to win, especially while fighting against 2 nations coordinating their attacks, by so having done slightly more damages to one of the two attackers is still not bad.

    Since you all seems not to be able to grasp this reasoning, then don't whine if people use turtles and doesn't respect you: respect is earnt, not a given.

     

    The Empress of Peace.

    Here we have a disillusioned teenage girl who has been taught by the best of the best to think more of herself then she actually is. This is a game. Your aggression only proves how immature and sensitive you are with your fancy words. The only point you have here is that you are whinging about being declared on while you are gone then nuking the aggressor. How is that in any way "honourable" and "respectable"? Does this also include your scurring to PM to whimper below the shadow of retribution?

     

    I leave you with a quote.

     

    "He who is humble is confident and wise. He who brags is insecure and lacking." - Lisa Edmondson

  4. Imperial Decree - New Polar Order

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Alrea

    50 minutes ago, Greatest Mothers said:

     

    Since when damages inflicted by nukes are invalid? :D

    It's a rule that you have in your alliance?

    Then you shouldn't use nukes: we have been nuked when we were inactive.

     

    I'm glad to lose while inflicting more damages to the enemy than how much they inflict to me: smart persons call that "victory".

     

     

    You're really boring, you're the epitome of boredom.

     

    The quest is extended to all your alliance.

     

    Since you guys keep pretending that 3 days of total inactivity are totally irrelevant, I'm extending the quest to all your alliance

     

    But the main problem isn't being trash and cowards, the main problem is that you also are

    boring

    This is a capital sin here.

     

    The Empress of Peace.

     

    The only problem here that I can see is that you are a whinging coward who can only win using twisted lies and half-truths. Perhaps a couple days out in the gutter should change your opinion?

     

    I also fail to see why you are complaining about getting attacked in D5. This is a war. The world does not revolve around you and does not hop at your call.

  6. Some needed clarification

    in Tournament Edition Open World Forum

    Posted

    1 hour ago, BDRocks said:

    Oh sorry, DAY 8. Woah you got me there. Bad spending did not lead to bill lock for most of them, it was continuous wars and having to collect in nuclear anarchy. My newbies helped secure our victory last round and they tried to play this round and paid for your envy of UN. That's alright, I can say 100% it'll be at least 2 rounds of losses for D1 in a row. Your alliance will be paying for your jealousy. 

    Will be waiting for another opportunity to throw you a couple of nuclear presents :)

  7. Extra Extra! Read About it Here!

    in Tournament Edition Open World Forum

    Posted · Edited by Alrea
    quote mistake

    1 hour ago, Bajoran Federation said:

     

    You seem to have completely missed my point lol 

     

    We only used those new nations in response to a massive merger that was no more honorable or just than us recruiting new nations. It was, however, formed due to the false information that the wolves were set to win the award. So, I don't blame anyone else.

     

    Just you.

     

    You had every opportunity to let everyone know that we were set to win it, but instead you purposely withheld that information so you can push your selfish and unjust agenda.

     

    I also find it funny that you're now saying we should let everyone formulate their own opinion, considering all you've done in the past month is lie, mislead and manipulate everyone into believing a falsified version of events. All I've been trying to do is let people form their own opinions, but people are forming those opinions with only one biased and dishonest side of the story.

     

    So far, every person who's listened to our version of events and allowed us to present them with proof to confirm our story has changed their mind on this issue.

     

    We are not here to play unfair, we do not aspire to cheat anyone out of any awards, nor do we want to do anything other than have fun and just play this game. Sure, we do like winning. Awards are nice, tbh. But we don't want an award that isn't rightfully ours. 

     

    Who deserved the award in r43 is up for debate. You did perform the best economically, the wolves performed very well too, and the UN had a pretty good sophomore round. But, don't pretend you were innocent that round, either. You merged with a foreign AA to beat our score, and we recruited a few nations in response (like 5, iirc?). Almost the same thing as last round, except you could argue D1 deserved the award in r43. 

     

    The UN deserving the award last round simply isn't up for debate. When faced with a difficult situation, we chose the best option we had in front of us. You then spun that into an attempt to form a coalition against us so you could go back to winning all the awards unopposed. Anyway, I'm done arguing with you; I'd be better off drinking bleach lol 

     

    I'll leave you with a quote: 

     

    "There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as 'moral indignation,' which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." - Erich Fromm 

     

    I find this hilarious considering this is a guy who defends people who attacks after a truce for last update is declared and pulls it off as self defence.

×
×
  • Create New...