Jump to content

Bluestrike

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    113

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Bluestrike

  9. Peace in the Land

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1323414831' post='2870616']
    So basically...DH couldn't take the heat of being called out for what they are and attacking alliances with no valid reason, so they backed out. well at least they realized how dumb a decision that was, question is, why didn't they think about that before making a fool out of themselves and showing how low class their actions are...?
    [/quote]

    You sure got us there, Perceus. We should go declare on CSN again, as to make up for our earlier tomfoolery.

  13. Nuclear Ascension Accords

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Wu Tang Clan' timestamp='1318946130' post='2827916']
    Sorry man, feels good to have allies behind you. Perhaps we're getting carried away with this "feeling."
    [/quote]

    Yes, your allies are behind you, hoping that you will make a decent meat-shield, as that is all your alliance is. All of your "swagger" comes from the prowess of your allies, and through none of your own.

  16. An Important Seaworthy Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    If NG wanted this to expand, they would have declared on SOS last week.

    Seeing as the CB pre-dates Non Grata, you've obviously been keeping this in your back pocket for some time, just waitng for SOS to become politically isolated enough to attack them with impunity.

    So please stow away the comments about wanting this to expand, as that was never the intention of this war in the first place.

  18. An Important Seaworthy Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Bluestrike

    [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1318826582' post='2826912']
    [color="#0000FF"]Before you go calling NG "ballless" (which is far from the case, do remember they attacked an NpO ally not two weeks ago) ask another question. Why did Invicta and RIA bow to outside pressure to drop a longtime ally?

    Anyway, go, go NG.[/color]
    [/quote]

    As an ex-member of RIA government, I will field this question if none of my old comrades feel up to it. To put it simply, outside pressure had no impact on the thought-process leading up to the treaty downgrade, in fact, it was that same outside pressure that kept the treaty intact for so long.

    During my time as the Head of Foreign Affairs at RIA, I spent most of my time fixing the mistakes and mending fences on SOS's behalf. The constant hand holding required to keep SOS functional was enough to drive me to the brink of madness, and I couldn't take it. We would clean up after one of their debacles, after which, SOS's leadership would profusely thank us and promise this was the last of their shenanigans. That scenario was replayed over and over again, but the fact that people like you, sitting in the Peanut Gallery, were so Anti-SOS to the point of hatred, were waiting for a cancellation to take advantage was too much. Now RIA is tired of cleaning up the messes, and the treaty was downgraded. It wasn't your OWF blather that lead up to the downgrade, but the gradual loss of trust that after a certain amount of time could no longer be ignored.

    That said, I hate to see the destruction of a community. All it does is serve to destroy diversity - the very diversity that makes this game interesting to play in the first place. The result of a war like this is not only the destruction of a community of 22 people, but the destruction of a unique identity, an identity much larger than that of 22 nations. It is these unique identities that makes the game what it is, without them the game would stagnate in it's own unipolarity.

    Have fun with this war, NG, because should these actions become commonplace, there won't be many of them left.

×
×
  • Create New...