Logos
-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Logos
-
-
Can there be a Reply to all button for messages?
-
Well he is clearly saying that we are better. LOL
-
So I would quite SE and TE to play Metharge Edition.
-
Well then they should have a higher range of attack for NS's larger than them. Not to go to infinity. SOLVED
-
As General of SWAT I say...Something diplomatic.
-
[quote name='CoffeeshopFrank' timestamp='1283457240' post='2439418']
Biased polls are biased. You should make it so that all of the mentioned alliances are in both polls.
[/quote]
QFT and everyone else is crazy -
-
Relating to this topic - http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=85287
Although it is related, both can be implemented, it just makes it easier to decuss. Then decide and let the mods waste away not doing it...I mean
...Darn!
Ok so you're fighting a war and turtles come out and no tech! So my plan is (drumroll) you get to decide how many soldier you send into battle! This is completely different from deploymnet. Let me explain
1. You deploy your soldiers (let's say 1000 men)
2. You decide you want to attack this guy who has like 2 men. So you only send 3-4 to attack him and the rest of you men stay in camp.
3. You get normal amount of tech.
Another advantage is knowing that you will have enough men to fight another dude in war time.
What do y'all think?
-Logos-
[size="1"]I hope I don't get killed by mods...I've heard scary things about them. Is that to bold?[/size] -
Well SWAT's "ghosts" haven't left yet!
Reply to all
in Tournament Edition Suggestions
Posted
[quote name='Overlord Wes' timestamp='1356131302' post='3066738']
Do you mean reply to all messages in inbox, or reply to all the people the message was CC'd to?
[/quote]
I mean the latter. Reply to all those to whom the message was CC'd to.