KenDeSolei514
-
Posts
26 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by KenDeSolei514
-
-
I see what you did there.
same here
EDIT: added 'here' because one word posts are impossible and you cant convey what you mean in them, so adding 'here' informs you all im speaking for myself
-
first!
13 is a bad number...
& good luck!
-
I spy with my little eyes... a spy?!!
SPY!!!!!
-
I wonder if Ragnarok and friends would've offered white peace as soon as they outnumbered the other side 4:1.
-
Honestly, this thread turned into a major lolfest.
-
Thanks for reaffirming my position again. We didn't want you to protect red unaligned nations. You are protecting red unaligned nations, you are breaking your surrender terms. See you at update.
See you at update? And here I was thinking that you would merely raid red nations for fun to prove your point...
-
Unaligned nations that need protection need to join an alliance, that is my personal opinion. They don't need harsher terms because this was part of the terms. To me, they are breaking their surrender terms with this 'doctrine'.
Well like you said, that is your oppinion, but in regards to whats 'legal' the facts are with NPO as it is with the NPO being allowed to carry this out. Its also clear their 'oppinions' of whats right and wrong are much more in tuned to the benefit of their friends then your opinions are.
-
Former Karma alliances, happy now?
So? It's not like NPO had some awesome surrender terms in the past (like the secret terms giving to NpO that was supposed to paralyze them).
So you're saying the NPO should have harsher surrender terms and not be allowed to have ANY doctrines pertaining to the red sphere, which is their home?
You would have them tell unaligned nations or nations theyre building relations with "good luck with that" in regards to rogues and the like?
Heres an easy explanation:
Old Revenge Doctrine & moldavi doctrine (the one the terms are against): complete domination of the red sphere, like the USA saying they are the only north american country, and peurto rico being the unaligned, not quite part of the USA but still under protection.
New Revenge Doctrine (the one you seem to have an aversion to): USA can still protect peurto, but canada and mexico and all the little countries down there can say theyre on north america as well.
Your anger at the NPO and your accusations of breaking terms are unwarranted and unprovoked. So what is it really?
-
Yes he has. It was part of their surrender terms. Which are now breached.
Breached? Because they protect from tech raids? You have a screwy interpretation of treaties and what the surrender terms were trying to accomplish.
-
Red Protection court? You have no authority to be protecting red so you might as well kill of that idea.
And you have the authority to tell them they cant? Its a protection agency not a oppression agency.
-
first! not cool!!!
EDIT: rats!
-
-
OMGZORS!
EDIT: *sobs* i tried so hard to be first.
-
Since it seems that TPF is at the bottom of a pile of dead bodies, I decided to make a poll to see who would dig them out of it.
Oops. Fixed.
I voted for every single option, even the none of the aboves.
MUAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAA
naw i hope TPF gets some help, i wanna see war.
-
It is always tempting to see a strange move and attribute some insidious strategy to it, but sometimes the simplest explanation for an event is the one closest to the truth.
But the simplest explanation is the most boring, conspiracies are juicy!
-
Unless I'm mistaken, the "Coalition of Cowards" event was more of a thinly disguised ambush tactic than anything else. They all canceled their individual treaties, but were still tied to NPO anyway, and fought.
Depends on how you view it, so unless you were in a position of authority and knew that for a fact, the majority would've seen it for what it was. And if it was the way you say, didnt they all come back one at a time? Hardly an effective ambush when you should all hit at once.
-
Why are you speaking as if you were NPO? Consider that most of us defened NPO, that name is quite an insult.
Maybe i was NPO at the time, maybe i wasn't, doesnt matter. And true most of you defended NPO... eventually. I was merely stating the justification for why i felt that was a wise idea to remember about allies. Other than that, if you feel insulted, I apologize you feel the phrase carries enough weight to be an insult.
-
bump for the hope that this thread MAY well get me some trades?
-
"Be VERY careful where you place your trust in allies..."
thats for sure, been a long time but what did they call them, the people who ditched us at the start? coalition of cowards?
-
since spherilion has already made it into a DIFFERENT trade circle although posting in this one
i would like LUmber and Oil and for BLUE
http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=375924
Peace in Our Time
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Now THIS is what deserves a round of white peace, the other war... not so much.