-
Posts
22 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by kSpan
-
-
I already had one person surrendering to me. Fair terms Karma, I expect he will comply.
0/ For the glory of Karma
-
Fight on until the end! For the greater good!
0/
-
I think that pushing people out of a particular trading sphere is nowhere near as worrisome as their tendency to push people out of existence in its entirety. Not that I disagree with what you're saying here; the Moldavi Doctrine is not something which should have ever been allowed to pass.
I agree totally.
-
It's a bad idea for someone who is trying to strengthen their own position to start conquering their sphere simply from a pragmatic perspective. But there is nothing about it that is inherently wrong or repugnant on any moral level or whatnot. To put it simply, you seem to take issue with acts that you perceive as bullying, and I take issue with acts that I perceive as irrational. Conquering a color sphere happens to fall under both of those. In a more general sense, though, an alliance having the power to bend others to their will and exercising that power is not necessarily wrong; it's what I would expect to happen and it is what drives the politics of this game. So long as those actions remain within the confines of the game (which taking over a sphere would) then there isn't anything wrong with them from an out-of-game viewpoint, and they may actually be desirable.
While I agree bending people to your will isn't a bad idea, but I think its morally wrong to do that to other alliances within the game. It takes away the possibility of playing the way you would want to play it. If you could 'corner the market' so to say, and make people boost your economy, then it would have a desirable outcome for you. But would hamper the growth of other nations.
-
But like you said letting more nations/alliances can do nothing but help the sphere, then why would, or should a alliances start booting people out. Just to assert ones strength? It would hurt the growth of the sphere and hurt the other alliances and lead to further conflict, that would harm the rest of the sphere by taking away tech deals and the like.
-
I say no one should be able to do what they did. No one should have the right to force people out of a certain sphere for no reason. That amount of power shouldn't be had by a single alliance.
Why should someone bend others to their will and threaten them for no good reason. It tantamount to bullying at a international level, and should not be accepted by the denizens of Planet Bob. Maybe a coalition of pissed off alliances to attempt to right those wrongs is what CN needed.
-
white peace, go onto POW AA, no aiding your former alliance mates or their allies.
I agree with that, but with payment for damages.
-
Xithos of GDA.
I'm sorry you got left out to dry. But business is business.
-
Does this mean that MHA is enforcing the Moldavi Doctrine for Pacifica?
Sounds like it to me. A bunch of tools.
-
Good luck starting a war with no one backing you.
When 99% of the world wants to see you in ruins, your doing something right.
/sarcasm
-
Attacking while in the peace process and sending a DoW 30 minutes later is pretty cowardly.
Then running away from your duties to a ally? Pitiful. You should be destroyed with the NPO.
-
Nation Ruler: Kspan
Nation Link: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=319607
Resources: Pig,Rubber
Which trade circle set do you want to be in? A
Are there any specific resources that you want? Sugar,iron,lumber,marble,spices, any of those
Are you willing to have non-Maroon trade partners? yes
-
I feel for you fellow commies. I was to late on the scene to be in either one though.
-
I missed all of this. Though I did hear about the whole youtube thing.
The Commonwealth Answers the Call
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
o/ hail CSN