Jump to content

Starbuck

Banned
  • Posts

    364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Starbuck

  1. VE- In terms of alliances that I respect, I would have to say that while it seems I am always a 180 of their line of thought and I may not agree with their actions. They know how to have a civilized discussion and there is nobody else in the game I would rather get into an argument with. Respectful and mature.

    NSO- They have a government system that wouldn't work for very many people, their actions are questionable, but unque, and I feel that is something to be admired.

    Athens- They know how to enjoy the game, it may get them in some hot water, but their allies stick with them for a reason and I think more alliances need to understand that this is just a game, Athens knows how to play for the fun of it.

  2. I hadn't really expected to give a speech, but I like to hear myself talk and I think others could use the lissening time.. To ADI I wish you nothing more than a bright and stable future on the Aqua sphere, though I still think you would do better on another color, maybe black :D

    To the rest of the civilized world who for what ever reason or another. ADI is a small fraction of the Totle NS of the Karma Coalition. You think becaues you can troll them, call them names, and insult Warbuck that you will bully them into changing leadership. I am sorry that this worked for the UED, but I don't think ADI is the alliance you can manipulate or infultrate and I wouldn't dought your planning on that, which I believe was the reason for your war last time. They decided they didn't want to go to war with you, you canselled the treaty, I think you have it wrong on who betrayed who. You cancelled the treaty when the going got bad, it was your choice to cancell.

  3. Negotiations weren't needed then.

    You don't seem to realize that this is exactly why people got upset with NPO last war.

    But whatever, I will let you ignore the fact that your allies are discussing peace with the people they are fighting with and declare war during those negotiations.

    /Classy/

    Would the negotiations be taking place if they weren't staring at the TOP of an IRON hammer?

  4. Hello planed bob,

    i have some simple questions for you, which i'm sure will receive many witty remarks and a $%&@ton of flaming but i will persist

    Why is it that every day here on bob that an alliances word is taken over a single nations word?

    And why is it that it is not as honourable to fight for your own nation on your own then to fight an alliance with hundreds of other members who dont understand why their fighting another alliance?

    why is one single nation not expected to succeed, unless of course said nation is a member of an alliance he did not help build?

    Why do alliances send out mass messages to non-AA's promising them protection from raiders, but they raid themselves?

    you may say that alliances are friends that help and protect each other, but then the same person may say it is foolish to sign treaties signifying friendship, isnt that the same thing? isnt an alliance just one big treaty between its members?

    all this being said, why isnt "cybernations"-"cyberalliances"?

    you may commence flaming, and trying to pick apart my logic with your cruel and witty remarks.....

    I want to answer your question, but I'll have to state that I don't have an official answer, only my personal belief.

    Why is it that every day here on bob that an alliances word is taken over a single nations word?

    It's easier to convince somebody your side is the truth, because there are strength in numbers.

    And why is it that it is not as honorable to fight for your own nation on your own then to fight an alliance with hundreds of other members who dont understand why their fighting another alliance?
    Now I have to disagree and say that it depends on the individual's purpose and what they think of it themselves. Going "rogue" in CN is viewed very unkindly, however I hold that the most honorable thing I have ever done is stand up to the alliance WF and go rogue because I felt they were a bully.
    why is one single nation not expected to succeed, unless of course said nation is a member of an alliance he did not help build?

    Mazola's higher archy of needs, you need safety before you can achieve self actualization.

    Why do alliances send out mass messages to non-AA's promising them protection from raiders, but they raid themselves?

    If you can't beat them, join them.

    you may say that alliances are friends that help and protect each other, but then the same person may say it is foolish to sign treaties signifying friendship, isnt that the same thing? isnt an alliance just one big treaty between its members?

    Yes, the charter is the signed treaty, you agree to it when you join, it outlines your rights, obligations, and how you are to conduct your self with your other treaty partners.

    all this being said, why isnt "cybernations"-"cyberalliances"?

    When cybernations was created, I believe the color spheres were meant to be the "organizations" you belong to, not alliances, but it just evolved this way.

  5. Oh, I did want to ask one thing:

    What happened to all those alliances lining up to kill NSO a week ago? Why are so many of them now cheering them today? It's puzzling how these things work, huh...

    Well, I don't speek for all of Df, but I would still very much love to see NSO destroyed. I havn't changed my mind on them, but I am above calling them out in a celibratory thread. I can dislike somebody and be civil about it.

    Congradulations Iron and NSO,

    NSO <_< grrr.

  6. I'll be down right honest, I know nothing about Alliance military. It's not my department and it never has been. I just kinda do what i am told.

    I have a question to those of you who know what your talking about, maybe you could tell me something about this. With most of the Athens coalition's uper ranks in peace mode, and assuming their lower tiers have a good war chest, if TPF's allies wiat until their lower ranks can come out of peace mode, I think it was said that could be in a few days. Could they simply have the lower nations attack, aid bomb them and destroy athens's adn co lower ranks. When the upper ranks come out of PM, hit them then. Everything is decided by the upper ranks, due to the ability to aid correct? So with Athens' and Co. in peace mode right now the lower ranks are on their own? Sorry if this didn't make any sense, just trying to understand.

  7. Although you should probably reread it a few times, I'll oblige you with the response "someone purposefully faked logs to make an already controversial statement into a damning statement".

    Thank you, mind pointing me to the fake logs, I have read a lot of log dumps in this conflict, not sure which one is suppose to be fake.

×
×
  • Create New...