Jump to content

Buller

Members
  • Posts

    377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Buller

  1. Yes i would like an open debate on OUT, instead of this "post vague post", "counterpost vague post with post calling on something else that isnt a vague because its hard to respond to vague posts" "countercounter post saying not vague topic is irrelevant to vague post but never actually do anything with vague original topic"

    its quite boring.

  2. Because obviously I wasn't a founding member and signatory of the treaty, nor did I work intently with it as a high gov official for almost two years or anything. No, of course not.

    My current alliance status has nothing to do with this anyway. Unless things have changed drastically since I've been gone (and from posts here and personal conversations with orange members, it doesn't sound like it), I'd say I have some merit in my words here.

    Okay so now your words arent without backing anymore, they are just shallow.

    eagerly awaiting the post where you elaborate.

  3. Thank you for this line right here.

    I haven't always seen eye to eye with Vanguard (heh), but I'm glad someone finally protested the nonsense that goes on in OUT, even if that means through leaving. Hopefully one day it'll turn into what it was originally meant to achieve in 2007.

    Thank you random GOD member for your insideful post about the workings of OUT.

  4. You are persistent, but if you need assistance to post within the accepted boundaries, you might consider not posting until you understand. If I insult you, bound to happen with the way you communicate btw, you can insult me back, but to do so crassly is considered less than intelligent, less than becoming a member of TOP and in fact 99% of alliances who bother.

    Try to make your reply at least half intelligent and you will shine like a beacon amongst the whole world, post crap like that and you will be judged as something probably closer to what you really are.

    I really don't want to stoop down to your level of making metaphors or hiding behind some farce of formality.

  5. axtually yes it does come across a lot worse, him telling you you are making bad posts is just some criticism you telling some one to go $%&@ themselves is just insulting and proves you don't really have any proper arguments to refute hizzy.

    edit spelling

    He insulted me what do you want me to argue against?

  6. His point though is that wars based on these reasons 'power politics' is a pretty broad and commonly occuring thing, and that the majority of alliances have partaken in it. And your reply feeds into that theory.

    Nothing wrong with this, just stating that it's inevitably true.

    My point was that NpO provoked the war and was planning our demise.

    It would be nice if you could define power politics because i'm sure someone could spin every CN war into a power politics war.

×
×
  • Create New...