Jump to content

NeCoHo

Members
  • Posts

    302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NeCoHo

  1. He's making fun of your incorrect use of the word "buy" in the OP. (ie: to "buy NPO" instead of "by NPO")

     

    You made an error, among many others. Of course, it is only expected that you would make a Freudian Slip of sorts and then not realize it.

     

    Anyone can be a ruler nowadays...

     

    Edit: Also, you're welcome for the explanation.

  2. The signatories of the treaty may view an attack on one as an attack on all, but that's only binding to the treaty signatories.

    STA declared on NPO and not all of the alliances that make up the bloc. Actions speak louder than a line of text in a treaty that's only binding to the signatories.

    Before you scream elawyer, I know why it's played this way, as it fits the narrative and the plan not to make it complicated on allies at CnG.

    Why are you arguing with the person who wrote the first draft of the treaty text?

  3. The New Pacific Order posted the DoW on The Phoenix Federation last time I checked which was the activation of this treaty. Thus, by announcing they are declaring on the New Pacific Order, they have made it clear they see that alliance responsible for the war. Oculus as a result can then acknowledge that Siberian Tiger Alliance has declared on the New Pacific Order and thus activate their defensive agreement and thus can now fight the Siberian Tiger Alliance. STA have thus suitably declared on the alliance which violated one of its treaties, and thus is worthy of its attention. Oculus really did not do a recognition of hostilities (Pacifica can do that themselves) instead it would have been more appropriate to announce it as a declaration of war in support of the New Pacific Order on the Siberian Tiger Alliance by the Oculus bloc.

    You would be incorrect. Oculus itself posted the DoW through Pansy.

     

    Also, I would like to direct you to the text of the Novus Ordo Seclorum treaty text that establishes that, "An attack on one signatory is an attack on all signatories." STA declared war on NPO, a single entity within Oculus, automatically declaring war on the rest of the alliances within Oculus. There is no need to activate any defensive clauses in this case. As such, it is well within Letum's rights to declare a recognition of hostilities on behalf of the Senate and People of Oculus.

     

    Also Junka, you might have some reading comprehension problems worth looking into on this one.

  4. It's funny, because I remember when TPF gave us an ultimatum to drop NSO or TPF would cancel our treaty. We picked TPF then and canceled on NSO to show TPF how much they meant to us.

     

    Fast forward and then TPF buddied up with a group we didn't like without any attempts at communicating with us. I'm sorry NSO, but you don't really have anything to fear.

  5. Lack of an ideological foundation will do it in. When it happens I will explain in an essay.

    I'm gonna call nonsense on this one for a few reasons:

     

    1. You have no idea what you're talking about.

    2. You're basically saying you'll explain something ex post facto at this moment even though you don't know what you're talking about

    3. There is an ideology: It's called "Anti-Junkaism" and its going to fuel us until you are no longer here, so if you want to defeat us you're going to have to go away forever.

     

    Have a nice day, you refuse licker.

×
×
  • Create New...