Jump to content

willirica

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    381

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by willirica

  5. Pacifica: the reformed alliance?

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    My response to that is if you're going to restrict what a person does you may as well just purchase them a new computer so you can have complete control over what they do on it. Nobody here has any right to dictate how somebody uses their own computer and the programs on it. That goes for IRC or anything really.

    Please; as if they can actually 'force' anyone to do anything, this is a browser based game ffs. If they don't like it then they can leave, or better yet (in francesca's case) quit. Cortath is being overly nice in this situation, do you think someone like baseballer790 would be afforded as many chances as francesca has? Lets get real.

  6. Pacifica: the reformed alliance?

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    Considering how success at this game is attained by exploiting what some people call "OOC" friendship for "IC" gain, I see nothing wrong with it.

    Ya who cares? Not that i agree with it but im not in that position and neither are you; however there are 630+ Pacifican nations that don't seem to mind how their government operates. If you were put in that situation all you would have to do to end it is resign.

    "I don't want to be a product of my environment; i want my environment to be a product of me"

  14. Alliance Sovereignty and Messaging

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    There are consequences for all actions - what those consequences are is up to the alliance in question that you messaged. Each will perceive it differently and therefore handle it differently. If you message Kronos nations with any of the above without speaking to gov first, those consequences will probably differ from the consequences if you did the same to, let's say, TOP.

    Well spoken; everyone will react different, however i personally don't view any as infringement upon sovereignty.

  19. Official New Sith Order Press Conference

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by willirica

    Personally I haven't seen anything in any of those three people that makes them a good leader, but eh.

    Have you ever been in an alliance led by Ivan? Just curious.

    EDIT:

    Since im going out I will attempt to answer your question better. If you want to know why everyone loves Ivan you should ask yourself; because its you and the rest of the cyberverse that enamors him so much, why else would you bring him up? If your suggesting that the New Sith Order is merely a personality cult of Ivan you would be mistaken. His position as emperor is as entrenched as mine, which is to say not at all. As for being a good leader, Ivan may not be well versed in the X's and O's of CN but he damn well knows which people do and who is best for each position in the alliance. The challenge system, arguable the most brutally efficient system of government in CN, exemplifies this. But to truly understand you would have to work under him and watch the man goto work; he cuts through the internal politics like a knife through warm butter, demanding results of which he almost always receives.

    However judging by the level of goading you have put forth in this thread and others, i doubt your question is a serious one.

  24. Announcement of the New Sith Order

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by willirica

    Your post was really directed at Revanche, but ok. First bold: nitpicking (the lowest tier is 'in the lowest tiers' and makes the same point). Second bold: correct. Third bold: see my previous post. Fourth bold: you didn't actually attempt to counter Revanche's point at all there.

    Heft, the conclusion in this case is that NSO will use political events to improve its own standing within the world, and plans for that in advance. Not earth shattering, for sure, and not really surprising from an alliance headed by Ivan (and with many other people from hegemonic alliances and ex-leadership in the membership).

    I dont think anyone in the NSO is anymore 'hegemonic' (lol) than say a leading member of the Grämlins ( a long time continuum member)? Do you? Seriously though your reaching pretty far on this one man.

    Edit: What Heft said :P

  25. To whom it may concern.

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    From the opening post of this topic:

    #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20. Have very little if anything to do with the allegations of spying.

    They neither refute the claims, acknowledge that such claims have been made and denied them, or have been suitable for an apology such at that which Krunk claims to have been making with this thread.

    This thread is moreso an act of harassment than a reaction to harassment. Thusly, this thread in it's entirety shows poor form and is inappropriate in general, but even moreso for a government official. If however this thread was concise, on point, dealt with or acknowledged the claim to some extent, or did any of that which you purport it to do we wouldn't be having this discussion.

    tl;dr

    lame thread

    There have been no actual claims or proof brought forth; anyone can say "hey your spying man", but if you dont have any proof to back it up ( of which they have none because these are completely baseless accusations) they are just empty words, they have been repeated told to put up or shutup and yet continue to harass Krunk for no rhyme or reason.

×
×
  • Create New...