Jump to content

Calixo

Members
  • Posts

    272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Calixo

  1. personally, i don't beleive reparations for parties who joined on behalf of a offensive treaty(or clause within said treaty.), they have with an alliance, should ask for reps, and in some cases the defending alliance should not either. because of total the damamges.If the amount of damage is greater, or critically wounding to the opposing alliance, then ordering reps is like pouring salt on a wound.

    reparations for the alliance that was initially attacked, understandable...

    and reparations for specific incidents, such as unsanctioned nuclear attacks, but that is more up to the descretion of the alliance.

    just my thoughts.

    Cal

  2. ya know, never actually thought i'd see it, first a suspention that kinda hooked me, and then this cancellations.

    well whatever the reasons, it sure has made the CN world a bit more interesting in these strange times.

    seems like the orders have somewhat finished their slow drift away from one another.

    EDIT; re. to post above.

    i havn't read this topic, as in all the posts after the OP, but i don't see why you care, or even reply to the "peanut gallery"

    unless you felt you had to justify something, or argue a point.

    btw. ignore this if you feel you need to.

×
×
  • Create New...