Jump to content

Vor

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vor

  1. I have Aluminum, Cattle, Pigs, Coal, Iron, Lumber, Marble, Oil (default), Rubber (default), Wheat, Spices and Wine.

    Bonuses are: Construction, Asphalt, Automobiles and Steel.

    It gives me a nice overall mix I find, population increase, infra reduction, happiness/income increase. However Spices and Wine are just fillers, till I can find a fish and water trade.

  2. why, beacuse when is the last time you heard of a nation with 18,000 citizens making 1 mill plus a day? a day in CN time is a long time...

    i have to agree with this...threat levels should be hidden...but then again so should your defcon rating... (maybe now it can be that we have spies...that way people would have to do an actual spy mission to find out that info about a nation and then a further one to do damage...just like how a proper terrorist/spy/special forces works)

    Threat level IRL is public knowledge. DEFCON I agree with.

  3. I think spies should have shovels and buckets. They come to your nation and steal your land. Muahahahahahaahahahaha!!

    No no...that wouldnt work lol.

    But Border Walls should defintly make it harder for spies to get in or out. If they have to climb a wall carrying enemy toasters it will be hard.

    They could escape in a plane, or a boat! But I do agree boarder walls should do somthing to help with spies, but perhaps they should be renamed imigration control or somthing?

  4. i already suggested a simple solution against the abuse of the spying features:

    1. you are not allowed to spy on nations wearing your own alliance affiliation

    2. you can only change your alliance affiliation once per 3/5/7 days (to prevent daily switchings)

    3. catched spies appear on an overview page, giving information about the mission and the outcome (already implemented)

    this way nobody can "spy" on alliance mates for mutual benefit (getting money even when all aid slots are full, changing government to monarchy, blocking the nations defensive spying slots...)

    Then it would just be outsourced instead.

  5. The threat level should be changed. Why does the population gets sad when the nation is prepared for a terrorist attack? It should have a upkeep price instead. It is expencive to keep a elevated readynes level all the time, security controls and surveillance costs money and is bad for the economy since it takes longer time to send people and mail form one place to another.

    I thought that at first, but having a happiness penalty, in effect, is an upkeep cost. Your income is decreased x amount depending on the happiness loss from the level you selected.

    I agree about the religion, government and DEFCON levels however. It would make more sense if religion and government changes took more than 1 update to become to become active.

  6. admin, I'm reading my Threat Level and it says. "Severe risk of terrorist attack." Now I realize that I'm in fact not at high risk and it refers to my intelligence agencies' readiness stance, but do you think you could change it? It makes me jump at 1st glance and could cause a noob to panic and place themselves at risk by not raising there readiness level.

    Maybe, "Your intelligence agency is at <insert readiness level here> level of alert.

    The wording seems fine to me. They are more or less exactly the same levels the UK has in real life, just worded slightly differently, and I expect exactly the same as the real world United States levels.

    Personally I'll never drop my threat level below substantial, even during peace times. Its worth 1 lost happiness to me to have my counter-intelligence agencies working at 100% capacity to deter terrorist attacks, despite having gone the better part of a year without entering into hostilities with any other nation in the game.

    If a newb panics and makes a mistake then its bad for him, but he will learn for next time. Although I'm sure it will be fully explained in the next edition of the new player guide.

  7. I see only references to a "threat level." Will it be replacing the defcon level?

    No, they are both different systems. In real life they are linked somewhat, but one is not totally dependant on the other.

    You could be at Severe threat level, like the UK currently is, but not have your military on full alert.

×
×
  • Create New...