Jump to content

Lokie

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lokie

  1. You can sugar coat it all you want, but at the end of the day, you are not on an ivory tower, you are just like everyone else.

    Whoever said we were on an ivory tower? We certainly do not claim to be on some ivory tower or be a special entity. We are who we are. It is only other people who can put us on those "ivory towers." I guess my point is we don't want people to think we are better than them or we are the best. We are the Citadel no more, no less.

    No Gods or Kings, Just Man.

    When I say Man I mean Humanity women included...even tho I still say Women playing Cybernations is a Myth like a unicorn. ;)

  2. the exact goal of the war has been defined is part of the clause as well. In a case like this, peace terms go hand and hand with it, especially as Gramlins is acting as part of a coalition. I personally don't care for E-lawyering, and they can do what the hell they want. I just found it interesting.

    To my knowledge NPO was offered peace terms was my information not correct?

  3. There's still a codex clause for joint aggressive actions. I'm assuming they aren't following it, unless they've already decided peace terms.

    Not be an e-lawyer but Peace terms have to be DISCUSSED...not decided upon..

    Here is the exact language:

    VI. On Joint Offensive Operations

    The Grämlins shall only participate in joint operations if the full evidence and proof for the CB has been shared, the exact goal of the war has been defined, rough peace term demands have been discussed and the other participants have been named.

    Carry On

  4. Words can not describe the sentiment I feel towards you cowards. You never backed down when it was a curbstomp...you never backed down with b/s CB's but now finally when you are about to face your match...you chicken out.

    Don't worry I will never confuse honor and your alliances ever again. It's a sad day for Pacifica....I guess in the end it was "the company Pacifica kept which killed the beast"

  5. Was the title supposed to be in reference to "The Tomb of the Unknowns" ? As Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is a disambiguous term as many countries have a Tomb of the Unkown Soldiers.

    If you wanted to reference the one in Arlington it's name is the "The Tomb of the Unknowns"

  6. Your being sarcastic right?

    Yep, usually

    Given those two outcomes I'd have hoped you would have preferred this one.

    Neither outcome really effects me so mehh. People complain if we have war, people complain if we don't have war. I like STA and I like NSO so yeah it's a good thing.

    Wow, I really hope he's being facetious.

    That's a good word and usage. Did you know that facetious was originally French and meant polished, urbane.

    You read the treaty, yes?

    Yeah...

    My guess is not. But we are all suppressing the urge to type "reading is..."

    You guessed incorrect sir. I did read it but never knew Tigers liked disorder and choas...Things you learn on the net.

    Until I see you complaining whenever the Grämlins, your allies, or anyone and everyone else signs a treaty; your words mean nothing.

    Evidently you didn't read TWiP as this is already done :)

    Settle down guys...You boys are a bit too sensitive for my taste ... Sorry I guess next time I should put

    This was a sarcastic response

  7. I don't know, she seemed pretty sure that her word on it was golden. Maybe you are correct, that is certainly a possibility in this as we are just forming our own translations of what was said but it seems pretty clear to me that she is trying to lay down some law there.

    Well this sorta of prove my point about context because you can't see all the responses in the thread. You/everyone else not in citadel have/has no idea if this was her 1st post on the subject or if she changed her mind later. When you are trying to interpret a person's comments without context you are merely grasping at straws.

  8. She said she would block attempts at membership in Citidel. How is that just stating a personal opinion in a private area? If that isnt being a dictator, I don't know what is.

    As far as I remember she said she would block the attempts of X, Y and Z alliances because of said reasons. What's funny about this is she pushed really hard for another alliance to get into Citadel, that's what I find most absurd about this...she wanted to expand citadel membership.

    As I said OG isn't a dictatorship, they have 3 leaders (Sun, Reyne and Pete), so she may move to block but the other 2 may vote to allow said alliance in, but who knows cause we have no context here.

×
×
  • Create New...