Jump to content

fahlenfor

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    90

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by fahlenfor

  2. Cybernations is reaching its age?

    in Gameplay Discussions

    Posted

    *Shrugs, I say admin can improve the donation system by exchanging it with points instead of infrastructures and land and tech. This points can be freely traded and used for other things as well, let's say create a special function of the game that gives its holder a bit of bonus that will have minimal effect on the game balance. And of course, if the user wanted to get infrastructure land and tech bonus, they can opt for that too..

  3. Cybernations is reaching its age?

    in Gameplay Discussions

    Posted

    Hey people,

    I've been playing this game for almost two years now. One thing that I noticed significantly is the constant reduction in players. I don't know much about what the other feels but I definitely felt bored with the current CN system. I believe that admin should do something about this game, and giving us a cool update that will bring the heat back into this game. Wars doesn't seem to help anymore nowadays, in fact, it decreases the player pools, which is bad. :(

    Some of the most useless thing in this game is team color, where the only advantage it provides is increase happiness for same color trade, and team senator, they are useless.. what can they do? sanction? Cybernation have to be able to create an innovative update that will be able to change this.. I don't know what will that be I don't know how, let the people at the suggestion forum do their job.

    I don't know whether its allowed to say this but just take a quick look at !@#$%* (I do not have any intention to promote any game in anyway, just showing an example), its also a free to play game AND its doing some major update and changes to the whole gaming system. Cybernations should do this too! The players have suggested many cool updates in the suggestion forum and we need them to be implemented.. perhaps Admin should also get involved in the suggestion forum.

    Admin, please do some major update or else this game will soon whither and die(although there will be many die hard players, but many of the active players will slowly leave the game).

    just to share a few thoughts of mine

  5. The Moldavi Doctrine

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    So you think you might be exaggerating a little?

    Nope. Its just terrible.

    fahlenfor, it doesn't have any impact on treaties at all. If they attack someone with an MDP using this doctrine, they can expect to get attacked. If they attack someone they have a treaty with, they can still expect the rest of their treaty partners to drop them.

    This doctrine changes absolutely nothing with respect to treaties. It's a thinly veiled threat against no one in particular, which isn't even credible until they act on it. Unless NSO just posted this for attention, it would probably have been better to just attach it to their first DoW that uses it.

    True, it has no direct impact on treaties, and at crucial times, it provides NSO with ease maneuverability to support and defend her friends in need. A plausible attempt, I might add. However, that also proves this treaty can be misused for bandwagonning. Threat or no threat, its wrong.

    You must be new....not that there's anything wrong with that....

    Treaties are trampled upon daily in this game. Some alliances stand on pillars of salt and proclaim their steadfast adherence to treaties, while abandoning them when it gets too hot, and/or they stand to lose infrastructure for their flimsy convictions. Convictions they don't have the sack to defend. This is Cybernations.

    The same people lambasting this announcement are the same hypocrites who would stand (2 years ago) in a 40-page thread and tell Ivan (my 1st Emperor) how insignificant he was while staring in the face of the fact that his OP ignited a 40 page discussion.

    Delusion is the name of the game, welcome to the machine.

    Well, that is exactly what differentiates between honorable alliance and a total disgrace. Of course, with so many alliances not scraping treaties nowadays, it became clear that treaties are mere papers, rubbish, expendable once it turns out to be a liability. I will never condone bandwagonning and never will, how can cybernations return as being a game that upholds a specific rule and integrity..

    /me exhales a deep breath

  9. Dark Fist DoW 2.0

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Who said that? Foxodi said that IPA could declare on NEW and then we would have a "legimate" reason to enter... just imagine that, 2 alliances instead of 1 declare on NEW and nobody would have call us bandwagoners :lol1:

    Ahh.. you said it. Yes. We prefer to have two alliances DoWing us rather than those without any valid treaty to jump in. If the story happens to be IPA DoW NEW first for its optional aggression pact with GR and then DF DoW NEW in support of IPA's Aggression, we won't have to troll each other to begin with.

    :lol1:

  18. Donation Stuff

    in Question Center

    Posted

    Are we allowed to buy donation deals for Tour of Generals from CN?

    I'm aware that the creator for both games is the same, therefore I am under the impression that it is allowed to do transaction between the two games..

    Anyone?

×
×
  • Create New...