King dope
-
Posts
58 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by King dope
-
-
Who will be protecting your members from raiders in the interim?
it was just me and emperor murphy, EUFN had more members but all either left or got deleted during the 11 months.
-
Following President Emperor Murphy's deletion due to inactivity, the EUFN has since 9:35pm UTC been disbanded. The EUFN has been around for almost 11 months and was expecting to celebrate the first year of existence on March 13th 2009. I will be joining another alliance.
For the history of the EUFN check the CN Wikia.
-
I like to introduce to you all the EUFN's Inter Alliance Cup. The tournament will run for a month with two games per week. It will be sponsored by Scotland Forever.
Any alliances seeking to play in the tournament will send two nations to play but as twenty nations in total can currently play in the tournament for the first compition a total of 10 alliances can get 2 nations to apply. Note if this tournament is successful then the next inter alliance cup will feature more nations.
The reward will be $3million with $2million for the runner up and $1million for 3rd place and also the reward will also include the winner's alliance to become the next host and sponsor (i.e have their alliance name before "Inter Alliance Cup").
The tournament will start as soon as it gets up to 20 members. So far got up to 6 nations willing to be in the tournament. Football would be played through xpert eleven.
If anyone is intrested reply to this post with
*Nation name,
*Ruler's name:
*Alliance:
and i will get back to you with the tournament's url. Good luck
King Dope
Prime Minister of the EUFN
P.S. for more info look at the CN Wikia: http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/EUFN%27...er_Alliance_Cup
-
i originally put this in the wrong forum but im now posting it here so you lot can see.
This is the new flag of the EUFN, the size is a bit too big but it should be smaller to make it easier on the eye, enjoy.
P.S. if you hate my avater then wave goodbye to it as im gettin it rid of.
This was the old flag
-
This forum has evolved into the CNRP forum so stuff that isn't CNRP generally is considered to be in the "wrong" forum when it's posted here.
sorry if this makes me sound like a noob but whats CNRP?
-
Awsome Flag!!
thanks
-
OOC: I liked the old flag better. But I think this is wrong forum,
really? i kinda like the new one coz it seems more professional kind of thing, i think this is the right forum as its a news reports for nations, alliances or news organisations and this is a news report from an allaince.
thanks for the response
-
This is the new flag of the EUFN, the size is a bit too big but it should be smaller to make it easier on the eye, enjoy.
P.S. if you hate my avater then wave goodbye to it as im gettin it rid of.
This was the old flag
-
yea newsreport it is but like to say EUFN wishes you well
-
The new President of the EUFN is Emperor Murphy he will offcially become so at Mid-day (GMT) January 1st 2009. For know will begin the presidential transition.
-
You realize that with 3 members, you might as well just nominate the next President since you're the tiebreaking vote anyways
tru i surpose but i always like the EUFN to be democratic when it can be
-
I will be resigning from the post of president at mid-day 1st of January 2009 following a presidential election that is currently taken place. who ever wins the elections on the 16th will become President-elect and will begin a transition that last till new years day (roughly 2 weeks later). i will post the winner on the 16th, till then go to Election article on CN Wikia for more info.
King Dope
President of the EUFN
-
It certainly is something to strive for in every alliance. I can see it is based highly upon high activity, high communication, and strong decision making skills thinking of effects a decision would have on other things. Again, something every alliance is looking for but if you put this into a charter as strict guidelines to making alliance decisions, then I think you've got something new. If the discussion of alliance affairs with all membership was made mandatory, and the idea of coming to a consensus and making concessions to others in the alliance when decision making was enforced (so you'd get something done) I believe it would make a strong community and would produce high quality decision-making based on the views of all members.
Good idea, I say.
Thanks,
plus i like to add the possiblity rogue attacks (depending on the viewpoint that alliances are against is) can/could be lowered with an enriched discussions and so on,
also forwardism can be beneficial for small and new alliances where the members were recruited randomly off the "display all nations" section on cybernations and not know each other prior to joining the alllances, with forwardism these allinaces will gain a stronger togetherness and so on, which will move the alliance foward and the ripple effect of that is they may be able to recruit better co-operate better and so on.
-
How come the words Butterfly Effect come to mind.....
Oh yeah thats rights its almost identical
it may share the whole ripple effect thing but its different, the butterfly effect just deals with small things making big difference kind of thing but Forwardism deals with the idea of getting people together as an alliance (or inter-alliance sitution) through discussing ideas (which rejects isolation and inactivity in the alliance/group) and if they like the ideas while bearing in mind any rippling effects good or bad, big or small the ideas can have in alliances/inter-alliances relations then they all join in and do so hoping to get the alliance or alliances moving foward co-operating and enriching the alliance and so on.
Forwardist alliances will have less (or none) alliances wars with other Forwardist alliances (as they can co-operate with each other) and can get better tech deals or whatrver aid, possibly creating blocs and NAPs and so on.
In short, a alliance can only move forward if its united and and have good structure that can evolve with time only through discussing, thinking and joining in on ideas sharing, this is what forwardism does. It also thinks of what can happing if such idea sharing will do (ripple effect).
Thinking of the ripple effects is sort of like a precuation or something.
-
Eh, choice is an illusion. Your "choice" is dictated to you by circumstance.
whether choice is an "illusion" or not you go through life having to choose stuff and you will get choices to which you can choose. In terms of forwardism, people have a choice of joining in discussing (uniting people) and if agreed do what they discuss and move forward hoping the effects of it be good or they can not join the discussions and more likely be isolated from the group (if all/most members do so the alliance is not united fully) which forwardism doesnt want.
you know by saying that i think i can improve the concept of forwardism or what i originally posted on here
-
Are you basically saying that you have to really think things through before acting upon it? That's how I was raised to think. But it would be better if everybody had that same thinking.
sort of yea
its pretty much sayin that if someone thinks of something then people can come together (uniting them) by discussing it if its beneficial to the alliance(s) (can help improve relations) and if they all join to do it (bearing in mind the ripple effect it can have) then it could get alliance(s) moving foward (like towards peace or acheiving goals etc.). You could also say that social class (in terms of leaders, noobs, experience players so on) is not a matter.
The ideology is pretty much can evolve or be improved upon and made more clear.
-
Forwardism is a proposed ideology about uniting people through the use of thinking, doing and moving foward while bearing in mind the lasting effects.
The basic points of forwardism is that:
- Everyone, everything and every action has a ripple effect.
- Thinking about point A is one thing but doing point A is another.
- Everyone has a choice, everyone has a voice and everyone can join.
The meaning of these 3 points are
- Doing something can change something or have repercussions on something (i.e our alliance) whether is be it good or bad
- There is a difference between thinking and doing and you gotta do one or the other bearing in mind the ripple effect
- Member(s) chooses something (a doing action), members talks and discusses about it (applies a thinking/doing action) and members can join it (again doing action)
A part of Forwardism is the Economic Forwardism which applys the basics of Fowardism with economy.
For example, an alliance that uses Economic Forwardism will have a member or members thinking about and choosing to do tech deals (or other economic activites) and other members will talk about it and discusses it and can join it which will then have a ripple effect on the alliance that can be econmically good or bad while at the same time getting people together and talk about things which would unify them and move the alliance forward to its economic goals.
I created it sometime ago, tell me your views on it, i know it can be confusing but then again i can always try and make it more clear. I think it can be good espacially in inter-alliance discussings and that.
- Everyone, everything and every action has a ripple effect.
-
I King Dope hereby formally issue this announcement before all eyes of CN, being of sound mind and body. I state that I, with my accomplice Taylorm2, am soley responsible for the legitimate actions taken by The United Front, and hold no ill will against The United Front. I took no action when The United Front approached me on respectful terms asking for help with one of my members, instead offering empty hope that had no real value, but instead was only a stall tactic. When The United Front again approached me, I chose to ignore their requests for assistance. I hereby offer this apology to The United Front, in exchange for peace, at their prompting, and agree to pay reps of 300 tech, with installments of 50 tech every 2 weeks. If I do not fulfill these requirements, I understand that this agreement is null and void, and attacks against my alliance, and myself will resume.
-
To: prather6 From: king dope Date: 10/9/2008 1:16:36 PM
Subject: RE: Reps and peace
Message: right now i am talking to the member and he said that he has attacked one official but by mistake and not meant to attack a official i will see to that your government offical will be repaid but will not do it immediately as me and the member needs to discuss how he will repay back sometime next week or at maxium of 2 weeks aka 23rd of October 23:59 GMT.
hope our alliances can overcome this and even hopefully find co-operation between us in the future
typed by me 4 days ago, liked how you did not included the last bit in your declaration hmm
now i see that instead of waiting 10 days for booze repaying you back, you guys chose to try and crush a smaller alliance. I am still talking to Booze and i have more then once told him to send peace offers (to which he says that it gets rejected) and i told him to repay back. If he doesnt within the 2 weeks (now 10 days of this post) then i will personally get rid of him myself. I got a threat from one of you guys that i will get "bounced upon" even tho all i done was try and get my member to repay you back. This war is unnesscery.
you say prather that i basically said to you " responded with ill get back to you in a week or maybe two; you guys would just hold" no what i meant was the repayment would be given in a week or two at most.
"Viva la TUF! We know much of this issue and have attempted to aid in solving it without accomplishment" No offence but i dont rember you trying to resolve it.
So anyways this thing is getting out of hand and needs to be resolved without the need for a pointless war, in summary i told booze to send peace offers and repay back now instead of waiting till 23rd the United front preferred to declare war on the entire alliance and according to one member i am doomed.
Agree to end the war wait 10 days and if you dont get repaid i will sack booze from my alliance and i will do my best to repay your members of 300 tech you required (will take a while as 300 tech is of course expensive and i may not get 300 in the required time, as i got about $1million), this i think everyone will agree with this is somewhat reasonable.
-
What do you guys thinks makes an alliance succussful in terms of recruitment drive, i think that by getting more allies and doing tech trades which then can result in getting more money which is use to help new members is a good way of boasting recruitment also it boost ur alliance existence and sercurity. Do you guys agree? or do you think heavy recruitment is the best effective of them lot? or do you think recruitment even matters that much at all? Live long and prosper everyone
-
OOC: Yes, but they are never up to date...
check here for all land claims: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=23616
well i guess im going to have to retract my land claims
. -
OOC: This is the CNRP map. We have our own little RP community :jihad:
IC:
Yes, this is an internationaly recognised map.
oh guess im little late in getting the lands then
but would you guys be able to alter it so i can have a land claim in one of the parts of the celtic nations? 
-
congrats on a new consititution so i wont get warned for a one word post
Thanks
-
OOC: Slightly out-of-date
IC: Red is Dung Carrig, Pink is the Proxian Empire, and yellow is the Welsh Empire.
And this was done by your alliance and his/her alliance? If so does the international community recognize that map (or updated map) as to be true?
.
Alliance/IRC Combo List
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Colour: Green
[url="http://celticworldorder.freeforums.org/index.php"]Celtic World Order[/url] (CWO) #CWO
Color:
[url="Forum URL"]Alliance Name[/url] (Acronym) - #channelname