Jump to content

Dragon919

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Dragon919

  3. Surrender Terms for Individual MHA Nations

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Frederico Rodriguez' timestamp='1323839774' post='2877356']
    I declared on one of you MHAers, sent just a single nuke his war, he messaged me with "I SURRENDER".

    Bewildered at the lack of fighting spirit, I sent him the surrender terms. I gave him roughly 36hours to change his AA to CnG PoW, decom and post in the surrender thread. He only complied with the change of AA, and then he sent me this:

    [img]http://i.imgur.com/KWjO0.jpg[/img]

    That's not surrendering, that's [b]bailing[/b]. I'm posting this so that you guys at MHA might want to sanction him or whatever you do to people who bail during war time, either way, i'm nuking him again, goodwill is long gone.

    [spoiler][img]http://i.imgur.com/tPIIX.jpg[/img][/spoiler]
    [/quote]

    And now the guy changed his AA back to MHA...
    So let me get this straight. You guys offer individual terms on the OWF and nations you declare on after the first set of attacks. You've netted 6 of 490 odd nations so far with this great strategy. Now most CnGers are showing some class and bantering about our use of questionable war crimes tactics :P but there is still a couple people flogging the dead horse? Seriously?

    Under Attack

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    I am personally unfamiliar with WAPA and that situation as well as the basic workings of CN politics.

    Spend some time in the OWF and AP forums. You will learn. Also getting some of your members to act as diplomats to other alliances will open up some new doors for you.

    Under Attack

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    I have no reason to be dishonest here and would get my aforementioned statement notarized if it would help.

    If this could be closed I'd appreciate it.

    sworn statements are well and good but this isn't a court of law. This is the court of public opinion and it is a fickle thing. My best suggestion would be to head over to NEOs offsite forums and start talking to them. Also, I believe someone said TPF was their protector. I would head to their offsite forums and request an embassy for Sultans. TPF are a good group and will help you if you are not in the wrong.

    Under Attack

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    If this truly is an unjustified attack, then this topic will not serve to harm the Sultans at all. If there is a reason behind it that none of us are aware of, then it most definitely will hurt their chances at obtaining peace.

    I would be hard pressed to find an excuse to attack a 37 nation alliance out of the blue, even for tech raids. While making this sort of topic is almost never a good idea, in this case, assuming the OP is factual and no actual reason exists, I'd have to say there's nothing wrong with the post.

    If nothing else, again assuming the attacks are completely unjustified, it will bring to light actions by NEO that nobody in their right mind will agree with.

    Since none of us can actually claim to know WTF is going on, I suggest everyone simply sit back and wait.

    Wow I'm about to agree with Tela. What is the world coming too.

    Suggesting that the OP lock the thread on the bases that this should be handled in private, and he is only hurting his alliance is incorrect. If OP is being honest then NEO needs to explain themselves and not hide behind private channels. If OP is not in control of his alliance and he is hoping the CN community will help him cover a blunder by one of his members........ prepare for your nations to burn. The CN community doesn't support the under dog just because they are the under dog.

    Liberation Accords

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    Completely different situations, completely different responses and completely different results. Besides. I'm talking about including an active combatant in talks of peace. Though if you really want to get technical. Yes, black team is taking advantage of the fact that GOONS cannot enforce their doctrine. That's obvious. But it is also a different situation and therefore is reasonable in that situation. Do you believe it is acceptable to announce protection for an alliance that is engaged in open warfare?

    How is it different? NoV has no ability to enforce it's diplomatic will in regards to LSF. You should have come into this thread and stated that "NoV still acknowledges a state of war between ourselves and LSF" and been done with it. This protesting the diplomatic slight that NoV just received is sad, among other things. NoV has no ability to wedge themselves into LSF peace talks, so they can be ignored by all involved parties. Do you believe that you still have a right to decide LSF's fate while you have zero ability to extend your diplomatic will?

    Freddy

    in Open World Forum

    Posted

    Who was the spy that this account belonged to that Freddy was given and logged into. I am in no way justifying Freddy using a Username/Account that was being used for spying but, I haven't seen any were in this thread that the source of the spying has been exposed.

    @NoV forums admin Who does this NoV account belong to that LSF and others used for spy purposes?

    If this has been answered, I'm sorry, I read the whole thread I really did. :unsure:

    Freddy

    in Open World Forum

    Posted · Edited by Dragon919

    Secondly, this screenshot was passed to me recently, by a spy that worked for the LSF: http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/994/freddywi0.png

    This screen proves nothing at all. Freddy received spy information from yet unknown source which could be a LSF member turned NoV/RZ spy or a party outside the LSF actively engaging in spying on the LSF for who could only be assumed is NoV in a sanctioned fashion.(NoV, I know that is a harsh claim but RZ seems to be working a propaganda campaign here) If you have IP evidence that the account provided was used for "spying" then please present it. Implicating TPF in this incident is extremely bad form given the accusations. The only person I see worthy of ZI is the person who provided NoV's forum information. (which is not provided by this evidence)

    @Reich Zealand - who is your source providing you evidence and why does this "moles" identity not come to light and seek NoV protection. This would go a long way toward proving your claims that NoV forums have been spied on.

    Rather it looks like an unknown/known( :rolleyes: ) element is working very hard to keep public support rolling for the NoV to continue hunting commies.

    *Honestly hunting commies = Lulz but destroying weak alliances with no way to fight back is just bully posturing after dunking the nerdy kid in the toilet, it doesn't gain you respect.

×
×
  • Create New...