-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Disman
-
-
Even though CNTE is supposed to be the agressive version of CN, I find that there are still too many people who care too much about their 'precious infrastructure' and instead of going wild with war they merely sit there saving and complaining when they get attacked. Because of this I feel that CNTE is still fairly tame. Sure there are a lot more alliance vs. alliance wars and a lot more agression in general, but I still feel like things could be much more interesting.
My suggestion is that each round of the tournament have a specific theme. This could include anything such as:
- No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?).
- No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos.
- Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation.
- Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had.
- Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero
- Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war
- Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round.
- Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people.
- No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time
- Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out
If each round were to have one or even two of these themes implemented, then things would be more interesting and more enjoyable in my opinion.
-
Heh, interesting, very interesting. Almost expected?
I'll be having my eye on this.
That pretty much sums up what I have to say aswell. This is indeed interesting, and I'd like to see how this pans out.
-
Choop, you have been no help what-so-ever to my original question. All you've done is cause a pointless argument and provide this thread with pointless asshattery.
Now, I am asking bigwoody (not anyone else) why he didn't include surrendering on the TORN forums as a part of the terms. Was it a mistake, or did you actually expect everyone to just know?
-
I recieved this message from one of my attackers earlier today. He stated that I needed to sign up to the TORN forums and post that I had surrendered there aswell. I have complied with all the terms in this thread, and as far as I can tell there is nothing that requires me to do this.
So my question is, does this actually need to be done? And if not, why am I still being attacked?
-
I, Disman, of Dismal Hills, surrender to Valhalla and its allies, having complied with surrender terms and changed my AA to Valhalla POW.
-
You should update this again. I'm curious to know how all the alliances are doing.
-
It really is sad that so many people go this far over a game.
Good luck on catching that lowlife
A Suggestion
in Tournament Edition Suggestions
Posted
It would appear that many of you arent thinking about these ideas enough.
If this were to happen, there would be hundreds of nukes flying around by day 3. The best part about this idea is that it would make it very difficult just to get to the #1 spot. People could no longer just collect taxes and never fight in a war to be one of the top nations.
Yes, people could stil communicate through forums, but no one would be able to hide behind an alliance to avoid war. Normally, most people would avoid attacking a nation in a large alliance, but with this idea, nations would actuallybe given the freedom to attack whoever they want withouot the fear that a whole alliance will jump on them. It would be near impossible for an alliance to defend all its nations if people wern't scared of attacking each other.
Firstly, IT WOULD ONLY BE FOR 1 ROUND. I'm sure if someone is annoyed that they can't start an alliance that they will get over it. The only people who would be annoyed are the people who don't like not being able to avoid war and just pile on infra, in which case they deserve it because getting owned and owning others is what CN TE is about.
Actually, I was thinking along the lines of 500k - 2MIL. 1MIL - 1.5MIL could have an 80% chance, while 500k - 1MIL and 1.5MIL - 2MIL could each have a 10% chance.
Both are also good ideas, but would be better if they were doubled up with another theme.
I'm not suggesting this one because I think it's not already good as it is, but because it would be fun to be able to destroy more infra and gain more spoils for a round.
Ok well after thinking about this one I decided it may not have been a great idea. BUT it could be with a few adjustments.
- No limit to how many offencive wars you can have at one time AND no limit to how many deployments you can make in a day (or maybe make it 3 deployments in a day)
I reckon this is actually a good idea. And yes, the whole point is that you wouldn't be able to restart after getting completly destroyed! A lot of people just re-roll if their nation falls below 300 infra, due to the fact that you can easily get it back. This idea would make it interesting knocking people out of the game.