kriekfreak Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1297420757' post='2629222'] Both are true. Our articles were optional by virtue of the non-chaining clauses. Of these, we either attempted to go in only to be thwarted by either someone else going in first (Exodus), no counter materialising (UBD), our assistance not being requested (GATO, MCXA) or being specifically told to stay out (SLCB). [/quote] No these are pretty much mutual exclusive. You either wanted in but didn't get the chance, or you didn't want in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 What I want to know is why he's suddenly so concerned about the well-being of our allies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1297420992' post='2629228'] What I want to know is why he's suddenly so concerned about the well-being of our allies. [/quote] I'm just looking for an angle to bash you, naturally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 (edited) [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1297420968' post='2629225']No these are pretty much mutual exclusive. You either wanted in but didn't get the chance, or you didn't want in.[/quote] On the occasions where we wanted in (all of which were optional, again no mutual articles were invoked with us), we did not get the chance (for the previously mentioned reasons). I never implied that we didn't [b]want[/b] in. [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1297421071' post='2629229']I'm just looking for an angle to bash you, naturally.[/quote] Par for the course, but you're barking up the wrong tree as usual. Edited February 11, 2011 by Arrnea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1297421145' post='2629230'] On the occasions where we wanted in (all of which were optional, again no mutual articles were invoked with us), we did not get the chance (for the previously mentioned reasons). I never implied that we didn't [b]want[/b] in. [/quote] Ok fair enough. You did give the impression though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 i saw the title and hoped it was something more interesting, like an SoSB - SLCB treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1297421071' post='2629229'] I'm just looking for an angle to bash you, naturally. [/quote] Don't make me try to dig up the quote where you said that you wished everyone in Invicta government was like me. [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1297421389' post='2629233'] SoSB [/quote] I...wow, I have literally never seen this abbreviation before. SoS (we're not [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Sultans_of_Swing"]Sultans of Swing[/url]) before, SOSB before, but never have I seen that one. The official abbreviation, SOS団, is right there on the left of every post I make and easily copied into posts, and if you really must, SOS. But never will SoS or any variant thereof ever be right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1297421389' post='2629233'] i saw the title and hoped it was something more interesting, like an SoSB - SLCB treaty. [/quote] That would be like Geert Wilders dating Mohammed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trikoupis Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1297412465' post='2629169'] An experience in which you maintained relations with both alliances, thus proving it can be done. [/quote] It can be done with a lot of work, with a lot of blood on all sides, and by always knowing which is your side and which are your friends. In other words, you have to prioritize. For the time being, MDoAP>ODOAP, so the priorities seem to me to be quite clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Congrats guys. o/ SOS o/ Invicta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Good to see this. [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1297419159' post='2629211'] SOS didn't even help their current allies out so why would they help out an ODOAP partner? [/quote] The irony of this coming from someone who's allied to SLCB is extreme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellbilly Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Congrats all around. This looks like a great treaty. Invicta are great allies. And SOS Brigade seem like some great people ( Locke). This is a win/win scenario. O/Invicta O/SOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amonra Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 (edited) A treaty with Locke? What have we done?????? All of Bob will pays for this! 0/ Invicta 0/ SOS Brigade Edited February 11, 2011 by Amonra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Trikoupis' timestamp='1297425135' post='2629251']For the time being, MDoAP>ODOAP, so the priorities seem to me to be quite clear.[/quote] Absolutely. We are fully aware of that. To us, our MDoAPs are more important than our ODOAPs and [b]should the situation arise[/b] that we would have to make a choice between the two, the choice would of course be obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorponok Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Good luck to both of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrash Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1297399803' post='2628920'] This is just embarrassing, why would anybody treaty invicta? [/quote] Maybe because we offered them more support in their recent situation then certain others did and we weren't even tied to them then. Glad to see this go up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Nice grouping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1297434903' post='2629340'] Nice grouping. [/quote] How did I know you would say this? I seriously should have put money on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1297437584' post='2629359'] How did I know you would say this? I seriously should have put money on it. [/quote] That would be like betting on whether or not the sun rises in the morning. It's been implied by the vast majority of people that aren't allied to you (and some that are), I just have no problem saying it outright. I mean, Haflinger and the weaboos all at once? Priceless. Once you add in the neighborhood tattletale alliance and it's just gold. GOLD, JERRY! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1297437960' post='2629363']That would be like betting on whether or not the sun rises in the morning. It's been implied by the vast majority of people that aren't allied to you (and some that are), I just have no problem saying it outright. I mean, Haflinger and the weaboos all at once? Priceless. Once you add in the neighborhood tattletale alliance and it's just gold. GOLD, JERRY![/quote] Who are you again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1297437960' post='2629363'] That would be like betting on whether or not the sun rises in the morning. [/quote] Which is why I should have bet on it, I would have made money; I could set my watch to your hate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1297439903' post='2629386'] Who are you again? [/quote] I started an alliance that was invited to join Citadel, the most elite bloc to have existed on Planet Bob. An alliance that isn't almost universally despised. One not allied to (almost exclusively, INT and RIA are fair) other equally terrible alliances. Hurr durr I'm irrelevant hurr durr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1297440407' post='2629392'] One not allied to (almost exclusively, INT and RIA are fair) other equally terrible alliances. [/quote] Before today, we were only allied to one alliance that you apparently don't care for. So you can't say that's in any way a basis for hatred that predates, well, today. And yes, you are irrelevant, not because of your position on the global stage, but simply because you aren't us and you aren't our allies. Those are the only two groups of people we need to care about making happy. Rant all you like, but it really has no place here and serves no purpose other than to inflate my ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1297440407' post='2629392'] I started an alliance that was invited to join Citadel, the most elite bloc to have existed on Planet Bob. An alliance that isn't almost universally despised. One not allied to (almost exclusively, INT and RIA are fair) other equally terrible alliances. Hurr durr I'm irrelevant hurr durr. [/quote] Actually, I was being honest. I have no idea who you are. I've heard of your alliance, but not you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Apocalypse Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 (edited) Good to see you won't be using this new treaty to bandwagon into the war, that'd just be lazy. Congrats on your treaty. Edited February 11, 2011 by Johnny Apocalypse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.