Archon Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 The 19th ranked alliance in the game, the MCXA, is next in line to get a sanction. Nineteenth. Ranked. Alliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendoftheSkies Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Merge into \m/ Problem solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg23 Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Well then I guess MK should start its recruitment drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 brb, changing aa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Only the best alliances get sanction status. MXCA is 3 MK members leaving away from becoming a better alliance than MK. Congrats to MXCA on their ascension to (well, as of now, near) greatness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted January 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Greg23' timestamp='1294812169' post='2572815'] Well then I guess MK should start its recruitment drive. [/quote] The point of the thread isn't really about MK losing the sanction, it's about the statistical standing of the alliance that would receive it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezy Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1294812156' post='2572814'] Merge into \m/ Problem solved. [/quote] I echo this suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Greg23' timestamp='1294812169' post='2572815'] Well then I guess MK should start its recruitment drive. [/quote] Join MK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 I thought that MK didn't like sanction? Or was it just TOP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted January 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1294812528' post='2572826'] I thought that MK didn't like sanction? Or was it just TOP? [/quote] [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1294812316' post='2572822'] The point of the thread isn't really about MK losing the sanction, it's about the statistical standing of the alliance that would receive it. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando12 Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1294812096' post='2572813'] The 19th ranked alliance in the game, the MCXA, is next in line to get a sanction. Nineteenth. Ranked. Alliance. [/quote] STA signs a big treaty so you come up with this to attention whore and shoot insults at MCXA. Stay classy Archon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg23 Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1294812316' post='2572822'] The point of the thread isn't really about MK losing the sanction, it's about the statistical standing of the alliance that would receive it. [/quote] I know I figured as much. I was just poking fun at the fact that MK received 102 votes for having the best recruiting staff. I do understand your point though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master-Debater Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 So? If they meet the qualifications then they get the sanction. Dont like it? Recruit to keep the qualifications up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294812646' post='2572828'] STA signs a big treaty so you come up with this to attention whore and shoot insults at MCXA. Stay classy Archon. [/quote] I don't think there are [u]any[/u] threads from the last few months that don't have Fernando popping in at some point and spewing a lot of !@#$%^&* at one person or another... just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1294812316' post='2572822'] The point of the thread isn't really about MK losing the sanction, it's about the statistical standing of the alliance that would receive it. [/quote] OK but with this thread you are giving the wrong impression of that MK really care about sanction and Rafael Nadal post just strengthens this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homura Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Remember when a sanction required 300 members? And there were only 15 alliances in the game that could even possibly meet that requirement? Maybe it's time to lower the requirement again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294812646' post='2572828'] STA signs a big treaty so you come up with this to attention whore and shoot insults at MCXA. Stay classy Archon. [/quote] No actually he's commenting about their ranking. Thanks for participating though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294812646' post='2572828'] STA signs a big treaty so you come up with this to attention whore and shoot insults at MCXA. Stay classy Archon. [/quote] Heh, where are the insults? The point he's making is about how out of line with the realities of the game the sanction requirements have become, not a shot at the alliance which stands to inherit one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 People really hate to be notified of anything, apparently. Bringing someone's attention to a fact is a dubious offense, Archon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Katsumi' timestamp='1294813002' post='2572838'] Remember when a sanction required 300 members? And there were only 15 alliances in the game that could even possibly meet that requirement? Maybe it's time to lower the requirement again. [/quote] Absolutely, and it should have been done two years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voytek Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1294813001' post='2572837'] OK but with this thread you are giving the wrong impression of that MK really care about sanction and Rafael Nadal post just strengthens this. [/quote] Rafael is joking. I understand why his sarcasm might go over your head though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 It's not that big of a deal. Go for the sanction, RIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derwood1 Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 For the love of admin don't let this happen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 I think 200 members is fine. Some at the top simply just don't want 200 members, otherwise it's well within their power to achieve it, but they choose not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted January 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Master-Debater' timestamp='1294812829' post='2572832'] So? If they meet the qualifications then they get the sanction. Dont like it? Recruit to keep the qualifications up. [/quote] Why is the onus on me/MK to "keep the qualifications up"? I didn't come up with the arbitrary limitation. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1294813001' post='2572837'] OK but with this thread you are giving the wrong impression of that MK really care about sanction and Rafael Nadal post just strengthens this. [/quote] Really? Most people reading this seemed to have no problem understanding what I was getting at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts