Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

[center][img]http://b.imagehost.org/0629/siriusbanner_2.png[/img]



As you may of noticed from our pretty little banner above, we have some new members in Sirius. Please welcome MCXA and UINE into Sirius.


[i]I'm not posting any signatures, so please imagine everyone's respective signatures here.[/i]



I think that's it, if I forgot anything please, don't hesitate to not mention it.[/center]



- Tarikmo, the official pretend Sirius spokesman.

Edited by Tarikmo
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

[quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294096514' post='2562365']
Is it still an oDoAP bloc?
[/quote]
yes and it always will be

Posted (edited)

I take it MCXA MDoAP is next, followed by UINE MDoAP? I mean, its kinda TIO policy to MDoAP everyone it seems. Waiting for that 4th IAA treaty any day now. :v:

An awful eco/odoap bloc just becomes more and more of a joke.

o/ inevitable treaty redundancy

Edited by Bernkastel
Posted

[quote name='Bernkastel' timestamp='1294096696' post='2562371']
I take it MCXA MDoAP is next, followed by UINE MDoAP? I mean, its kinda TIO policy to MDoAP everyone it seems.

An awful eco/odoap bloc just becomes more and more of a joke.
[/quote]
My god, your right, at this rate the bloc will be as bad as your posting! We'll address this issue as soon as someone cares, thanks for the input.

Posted

[quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1294096723' post='2562372']
[font="Georgia"]Everyone knew about this days ago.[/font]
[/quote]

Way to be a party pooper. Get off that high-horse Mathias, there's lovely filth down here.

Posted

[quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1294096723' post='2562372']
[font="Georgia"]Everyone knew about this days ago.[/font]
[/quote]
Darn, your good, I didn't even know about it until yesterday.

Posted

[quote name='Facade' timestamp='1294096800' post='2562377']
Way to be a party pooper. Get off that high-horse Mathias, there's lovely filth down here.
[/quote]

[font="Georgia"]No I'm being serious. Everyone did know about this already.[/font]

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1294097024' post='2562381']
[font="Georgia"]No I'm being serious. Everyone did know about this already.[/font]
[/quote]

I didn't hear about it until tomorrow. You sure are clever Mathias! :smug:

Edited by Facade
Posted

[quote name='Tarikmo' timestamp='1294096788' post='2562376']
My god, your right, at this rate the bloc will be as bad as your posting! We'll address this issue as soon as someone cares, thanks for the input.
[/quote]
Your bloc would carry more political weight if it was more obligatory defense and if all member alliances had at least or near 100 members. 2 of the alliances don't even have 25 nations. The bloc looks good on paper, but has lots of work to do. I will give you guys credit for acquiring SCY and Keve69.

Posted

[quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294097491' post='2562388']
Your bloc would carry more political weight if it was more obligatory defense and if all member alliances had at least or near 100 members. 2 of the alliances don't even have 25 nations. The bloc looks good on paper, but has lots of work to do. I will give you guys credit for acquiring SCY and Keve69.
[/quote]
That's a respectable stance. I'll agree with you there, it's not the best looking bloc, but we are closer then meets the eye. Nevertheless, I agree.

Posted

[quote name='Bernkastel' timestamp='1294096696' post='2562371']
I take it MCXA MDoAP is next, followed by UINE MDoAP? I mean, its kinda TIO policy to MDoAP everyone it seems. Waiting for that 4th IAA treaty any day now. :v:

An awful eco/odoap bloc just becomes more and more of a joke.

o/ inevitable treaty redundancy
[/quote]

Without your comments, I wasn't sure if we had done the right thing.... if you disagree, then I know we have made the correct decision.

[quote name='Facade' timestamp='1294097184' post='2562384']
I didn't hear about it until tomorrow. You sure are clever Mathias! :smug:
[/quote]
Wow. I thought I was last to know things... but I knew about it before you so yay :D

Posted

[quote name='Fernando12' timestamp='1294097491' post='2562388']
Your bloc would carry more political weight if it was more obligatory defense and if all member alliances had at least or near 100 members. 2 of the alliances don't even have 25 nations. The bloc looks good on paper, but has lots of work to do. I will give you guys credit for acquiring SCY and Keve69.
[/quote]
Strength doesn't always come in numbers.

Posted

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1294098445' post='2562404']
Strength doesn't always come in numbers.
[/quote]
Can you tell me the last war that was won with fewer numbers or a very small upper tier?

What you say sounds nice, but it isn't practical to think that way. I wish your bloc well, but you need to build a large upper tier.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...