sarasate Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1293690466' post='2558042'] The cese-fire states the following: [i]"All virtual signatures below are stating that they will not contribute to any hostilities against any other alliance that also signed here."[/i] So those who haven't signed it are free to be attacked by the signitors of the agreement. [/quote] Oh I see... but that seems to me just like one huge alliance pact. oh shwell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axolotlia Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293690076' post='2558034'] Time for the stats as of now: RE: 59 nations, 105,842ns G-6 (who had a bunch of nations join tonight rising 30,000ns): 69 nations, 144,646ns Totals: 128 nations, 250,000+ Warriors: 105 nations, 147,000ishns WAPA: 24 nations, 36,000ishns Totals: 129 nations, 183,000ns Yeah that's about right, all things considered. [/quote] Stats from mid-blitz I noticed BTW this is why we gained those nations:[quote name='Alexandros o Megas' timestamp='1293688385' post='2558005'] Spartan War Games is in too merging with G-6 !! [/quote] ______ [quote name='sarasate' timestamp='1293690306' post='2558038'] just a question; isn't g-6 part of the ceasefire 'til 1/2/11, while RE and Warriors are just not involved in it at all? I just don't see why g-6 is taking part... shouldn't it be between alliances not in the ceasefire treaty? [/quote] [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1293690466' post='2558042'] The cese-fire states the following: [i]"All virtual signatures below are stating that they will not contribute to any hostilities against any other alliance that also signed here."[/i] So those who haven't signed it are free to be attacked by the signitors of the agreement. [/quote] I think that rules that out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293690076' post='2558034'] Time for the stats as of now: RE: 59 nations, 105,842ns G-6 (who had a bunch of nations join tonight rising 30,000ns): 69 nations, 144,646ns Totals: 128 nations, 250,000+ Warriors: 105 nations, 147,000ishns WAPA: 24 nations, 36,000ishns Totals: 129 nations, 183,000ns Yeah that's about right, all things considered. [/quote] We were warned that the enemy launches a massive cry in defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelios Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 We didnt have a bad amount of declares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Axolotlia' timestamp='1293691278' post='2558050']Stats from mid-blitz I noticed [/quote] Well, I was going to use the ones from yesterday, but then G-6 added in about 9 nations and 30,000ns since then. That should count too, if they needed the help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King James XVIII Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Best of luck everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1293691828' post='2558055'] We didnt have a bad amount of declares [/quote] Lies. 21 wars launched on 29th, yes you did. Edited December 30, 2010 by mikk206 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusion Posted December 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293690076' post='2558034'] Time for the stats as of now: RE: 59 nations, 105,842ns G-6 (who had a bunch of nations join tonight rising 30,000ns): 69 nations, 144,646ns Totals: 128 nations, 250,000+ Warriors: 105 nations, 147,000ishns WAPA: 24 nations, 36,000ishns Totals: 129 nations, 183,000ns Yeah that's about right, all things considered. [/quote] It's too bad I have the actual stats, eh? [img]http://i54.tinypic.com/i2vlhe.jpg[/img] [img]http://i54.tinypic.com/2mgmqsh.jpg[/img] 165,548 (Warriors) + 41,451 (WAPA) = 206,999 24 (WAPA) + 105 (Warriors) = 129 Warriors/WAPA ANS = 1604 --- [img]http://i56.tinypic.com/10elg88.jpg[/img] [img]http://i56.tinypic.com/2eppndl.jpg[/img] 99,911 (RE) + 118, 154 + 30k (G-6) = 248, 865 60 (G-6) + 59 (RE) = 130 G-6/RE ANS = 1914 So it's a bit over 40k NS...Which once again was unexpected. But there isn't a 70k+ Difference, Clash, my old pal. And to be fair when we planned it was way more even....I thought these were the 'fair' fights you enjoy so much Clash. Edit: Fixed the stats since we had around 10 nations join us today which was unexpected...just a few old friends. Confusion. Edited December 30, 2010 by Confusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 G-6 be popping bottles in the ice like a blizzard ya'll o/ having some fun like a G6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunnet Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Nice blitz men. Well and trully caught with the breeks at the ankles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einer Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 I would like to partially retract my statements from the G-6 DoE thread. Say what you will about the cheap and slightly gaudy detailing, but it turns out that they have horsepower to spare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 G-6 be like a flash-bang. Flashy at first but when you get hit BANG!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 (edited) G-6 attacked pretty well, I don't think anyone's going to deny that. [quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1293692396' post='2558065']165,548 (Warriors) + 41,451 (WAPA) = 206,999 24 (WAPA) + 105 (Warriors) = 129 Warriors/WAPA ANS = 1604 --- 99,911 (RE) + 118, 154 (G-6) = 218, 865 60 (G-6) + 59 (RE) = 119 G-6/RE ANS = 1839[/quote] Your stats are from wayyyy early. Yepp, more total ns even before build-up and higher avg ns. You did have 9 nations and 30,000 more ns added between the stats you give and when you went to war Confusion. Leaving that out won't change it, so let's not lie by omission about it k? Who give a frickin' crap anyways though. Onwards to war. Edited December 30, 2010 by Clash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusion Posted December 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293693577' post='2558089'] G-6 attacked pretty well, I don't think anyone's going to deny that. Yepp, more total ns even before build-up and higher avg ns. You did have 9 nations and 30,000 more ns added between the stats you give and when you went to war Confusion. Leaving that out won't change it, so let's not lie by omission about it k? Who give a frickin' crap anyways though. Onwards to war. [/quote] I added the 30k NS before you replied. Beat you to it. Confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiumiento Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1293690466' post='2558042'] The cese-fire states the following: [i]"All virtual signatures below are stating that they will not contribute to any hostilities against any other alliance that also signed here."[/i] So those who haven't signed it are free to be attacked by the signitors of the agreement. [/quote] I Agree to this all the way. From what I have seen. I do not think any treaty matters now anyway. We have just done our work. And done it very good. So I will sit now and await and see what fate has stored for me in the very near future. I have a pretty good hint. That my fate is going to be in the good standing and very much alive page. For the others I am at war with. Probably not going to be on the same page. Or even in the same book. I think they will be in the obituaries. Sorry. I am just doing my job. I am a member of a family. A family of strong loyal and very trusted brothers. From all over planet bob. We may be from all parts of this world. But we can be in the same place all at ounce in a small period of time and very well organised if needed. As you will notice if you go and check the war screens. I think that we should be giving some good reps for this one. It takes the work of many all together to get work this good accomplished. So go ahead and give us all reps. I am pretty sure we deserve it. I know That I saw the word [color="#FF0000"][b]anarchied[/b][/color] quite a bit tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1293692396' post='2558065']165,548 (Warriors) + 41,451 (WAPA) = 206,999 24 (WAPA) + 105 (Warriors) = 129 Warriors/WAPA ANS = 1604 --- 99,911 (RE) + 118, 154 + 30k (G-6) = 248, 865 60 (G-6) + 59 (RE) = 130 G-6/RE ANS = 1914[/quote] That's a bit closer. Though you are mixing in stats from 3am yesterday with more current ones lol More nations, more total NS and a much higher average ns. That's your idea of fair I guess. It's good to be so feared Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='williamson69' timestamp='1293693843' post='2558093'] I Agree to this all the way. From what I have seen. I do not think any treaty matters now anyway. We have just done our work. And done it very good. [/quote] Oh yeah I agree with part of that. Hiding safely behind the cease-fire so you could attack others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleRena Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293694182' post='2558098'] Hiding safely behind the cease-fire so you could attack others. [/quote] Don't be upset Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiumiento Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293694182' post='2558098'] Oh yeah I agree with part of that. Hiding safely behind the cease-fire so you could attack others. [/quote] No need to start getting all mad about it. It is just TE. This is for fun. You have replied to almost every post in this thread. LOL. Are you a little bothered by being anrchied. I am sorry. I will make sure to tell everyone to make sure you do not get out of anarchy for more than 24 hours during this war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293694106' post='2558097'] More nations, more total NS and a much higher average ns. That's your idea of fair I guess. It's good to be so feared [/quote] 1 nation more I smell a butt hurt here. Perhaps you should have staied in CN.SE. Edited December 30, 2010 by mikk206 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='williamson69' timestamp='1293694601' post='2558102']No need to start getting all mad about it. It is just TE. This is for fun. You have replied to almost every post in this thread. LOL. Are you a little bothered by being anrchied.[/quote] Oh I dont much care about that. You guys put out a great blitz against alliances that thought there wasn't going to be any wars before the first. You hid behind a cease-fire treaty that made sure you wouldn't get attacked yourselves, so you could sucker-punch us. All's fair in love and war right? But let's not pretend anything else was fair. It's easy to get off to a good start when you have every advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleRena Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293694947' post='2558106'] Words [/quote] Deal with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roi Loup Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1293694947' post='2558106'] Oh I dont much care about that. You guys put out a great blitz against alliances that thought there wasn't going to be any wars before the first. You hid behind a cease-fire treaty that made sure you wouldn't get attacked yourselves, so you could sucker-punch us. All's fair in love and war right? But let's not pretend anything else was fair. It's easy to get off to a good start when you have every advantage. [/quote] seems to me it was you who let your guard down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1293695053' post='2558109'] Deal with it [/quote] We will. The war is on the battlefields, not in here. In here is where the BS is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 If you did not expect a war before the new year, why didn't you sign the peace treaty? If you did not sign it you are open for attacks 24/7. Thus in my eyes you were expecting a war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts