Scorbolt Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1288389775' post='2496666'] Welcome back to the hegemony MK [/quote] Our hegemonic intents couldn't keep us away for long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 What happened to going paperless MK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voytek Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Ferrozoica Hive' timestamp='1288383163' post='2496589']May you live in interesting times.[/quote] If you thought this insult was ~*~too subtle~*~ to go unnoticed you are sorely mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Jay Z' timestamp='1288387865' post='2496648'] Oh hey VE, you lost power to the bloc you were the "architect" of. [/quote]FOK were really the ones that kick-started this bloc, thanks for playing though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 (edited) I don't see why you people pretend non-chaining treaties matter. They never have. People will go in for whoever they want to go in for. It's just a facade. There might be around 2 examples where non-chaining mattered, but I mean really. Edited October 29, 2010 by Earogema Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 It's good to see this come about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbeast Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 Glad to be a part of this with some of the most humble down to earth alliances ot there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbeast Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1288389775' post='2496666'] Welcome back to the hegemony MK [/quote] Thanks brah. It's good to be back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 MK go back to their enabling ways... Also this treaty is missing LJs sig, he's the one who created the channel :colbert: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lebubu Posted October 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='MagicalTrevor' timestamp='1288397460' post='2496736'] MK go back to their enabling ways... Also this treaty is missing LJs sig, he's the one who created the channel :colbert: [/quote] babyjesus actually. I mean sandwich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='lebubu' timestamp='1288397540' post='2496740'] babyjesus actually. I mean sandwich. [/quote] !@#$ yeah you're right. Where is his sig then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Carter Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 Nice treaty and all, but it should have been named "The Access to Toad's Kitchen Accords'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lusitan Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 Let's be drinking buddies! 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [color="#0000FF"]Yet another unsurprising treaty. It was my guess, and that of many others, than MK would sign a treaty with both Umbrella and GOONS. Really, why did you even cancel on them to begin with? Did you really think you would fool anyone about where your FA direction was going to go? Your intents were obvious from the get go.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lusitan Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1288398830' post='2496751'] [color="#0000FF"]Yet another unsurprising treaty. It was my guess, and that of many others, than MK would sign a treaty with both Umbrella and GOONS. Really, why did you even cancel on them to begin with? Did you really think you would fool anyone about where your FA direction was going to go? Your intents were obvious from the get go.[/color] [/quote] My personal and possibly uneducated guess is that MK wanted to get ride of some sensitive treaties that would cost (politically wise) them alot to cancel because they had alot of meaning or history. Cancelling them all was much easier and less painful and it's much harder for the general people to figure out who are the "excluded" partners when MK is signing them one by one at their own pace. In fact, it allows them to manage the amount of critics they get at a time to soften any resultant PR damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Voytek' timestamp='1288392926' post='2496699'] If you thought this insult was ~*~too subtle~*~ to go unnoticed you are sorely mistaken. [/quote] It wasn't an insult, buckwheat. You need to give up your need to twist my words, repetitive and ego-feeding thought it is. The Kingdom wanted to shake things up - more power to y'all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 Pretty nice guys, congrats. I think a better name would be the Umbremushgoons accord. Maybe this is why nobody lets me name blocs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1288374048' post='2496463'] Congratz and all nice treaty and such but why not just sign with the bloc instead of becoming defacto members. Yes i realise its non chaining but really like any of the above AAs wouldnt join in anyway. I do like the board access part to the treaty shows a lot of trust and solid foundations for future relations between the three. [/quote] You have the capacity to be a reasonable person, Buds, so I'm sure you can tell the difference between these Accords and being a member of Pandora's Box. [quote name='chefjoe' timestamp='1288374496' post='2496466'] What a suprise.... This is totaly innovative and on the cutting edge of progress for sure lol NOT. [/quote] [img]http://watchboratonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/borat-high-five.jpg[/img] [quote name='We Are Not Alone' timestamp='1288380343' post='2496546'] Its almost like they never left. Well it was nice having MK gone for a whole few weeks. Also I could've called this treaty from a mile away. Lines being drawn obviously. [/quote] Predicting that MK would sign treaties with our closest friends? My God, you're like some sort of prophet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMuz Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Ferrozoica Hive' timestamp='1288399198' post='2496755'] It wasn't an insult, buckwheat. You need to give up your need to twist my words, repetitive and ego-feeding thought it is. The Kingdom wanted to shake things up - more power to y'all. [/quote] "May you live in interesting times" is as much an insult as saying "I hope you die". If that wasn't what you meant, you should've picked a different phrase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Lusitan' timestamp='1288399043' post='2496753'] My personal and possibly uneducated guess is that MK wanted to get ride of some sensitive treaties that would cost (politically wise) them alot to cancel because they had alot of meaning or history. Cancelling them all was much easier and less painful and it's much harder for the general people to figure out who are the "excluded" partners when MK is signing them one by one at their own pace. In fact, it allows them to manage the amount of critics they get at a time to soften any resultant PR damage. [/quote] If their intent was to manage PR damage, this was absolutely the last treaty they should have signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1288402012' post='2496785'] If their intent was to manage PR damage, this was absolutely the last treaty they should have signed. [/quote] You are full of "wity" comments tonight Joe Also, what a shocker on this treaty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lusitan Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1288402012' post='2496785'] If their intent was to manage PR damage, this was absolutely the last treaty they should have signed. [/quote] I am not exactly sure what you mean by that. PR damage and eventual ex-ally unhappiness will come from the treaties they don't sign rather than those they re-sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buds The Man Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Denial' timestamp='1288401376' post='2496775'] You have the capacity to be a reasonable person, Buds, so I'm sure you can tell the difference between these Accords and being a member of Pandora's Box. [img]http://watchboratonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/borat-high-five.jpg[/img] Predicting that MK would sign treaties with our closest friends? My God, you're like some sort of prophet. [/quote] Thanks I think but the question comes from believing MK to be the type of ally that will defend regardless so even though the OA is included with a non chain it seems to me that MK will in fact honor it regardless. Which led me to the question why not just join PB. By being tied to both GOONS and UMBRELLA it really makes it appear to be a defacto signing of PB bloc. Maybe im wrong and MK feels very close to these two and will manage their treaties in a way to ensure they are defended while not necessarily following the moves of PB but I just didnt picture MK being that politically motivated once treaties were signed. Thats why I asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 We have an obligation to defend GOONS and Umbrella. We do not have an obligation to defend VE, iFOK and PC (nor do they have an obligation to defend us). The difference is as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1288401570' post='2496777'] "May you live in interesting times" is as much an insult as saying "I hope you die". If that wasn't what you meant, you should've picked a different phrase. [/quote]I thought Karma said something about not policing dissent on the public forums, but here you are, stretching things beyond all reason just so you can puff your chests out and look all touch like. Good job! It's all happening just like everyone thought it would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts